|
Post by jonbain on Aug 1, 2021 19:08:42 GMT
As for my first assertion, can anyone here PROVE that genetics is anything more than pseudo-science?
In specific all the racial classification going on,
which to me simply looks like the sophistry of racism.
Is there an experiment I can actually do that has some meaningful use here?
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 22, 2021 1:28:23 GMT
>>>1. If logic is subjective, then logic is opinion.<<<
Yes.
>>>2. If logic is an opinion and you use logic to formulate an argument then that argument is an opinion.<<<
Yes.
>>>3. You are using an opinion to formulate another opinion yet contradictorily you state it as a fact, using logic (which is an opinion according to you), that logic is an opinion.<<<
Yes.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 27, 2021 21:55:30 GMT
>>>1. If logic is subjective, then logic is opinion.<<< Yes. >>>2. If logic is an opinion and you use logic to formulate an argument then that argument is an opinion.<<< Yes. >>>3. You are using an opinion to formulate another opinion yet contradictorily you state it as a fact, using logic (which is an opinion according to you), that logic is an opinion.<<< Yes. You are stating opinion as fact then and fall under the problem of making strict assertions and stating them as fact (which you accuse me of).
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 27, 2021 21:56:43 GMT
As for my first assertion, can anyone here PROVE that genetics is anything more than pseudo-science?
In specific all the racial classification going on,
which to me simply looks like the sophistry of racism.
Is there an experiment I can actually do that has some meaningful use here?
So white, black and asian people all share the exact same genetic profile if there differences are pure sophistry?
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Sept 28, 2021 12:36:07 GMT
As for my first assertion, can anyone here PROVE that genetics is anything more than pseudo-science?
In specific all the racial classification going on,
which to me simply looks like the sophistry of racism.
Is there an experiment I can actually do that has some meaningful use here?
So white, black and asian people all share the exact same genetic profile if there differences are pure sophistry? People have known that white people produce white offspring, and black people produce black offspring since long before
the scientific method perfected by Newton; since long before the simplest microscope noticed cells.
What I am asking is:
What has modern theories on genes added to this basic observation?
What basic experiment can a person do to prove genetic theory?
Obviously this will be using plants or insects.
My assertion is that all plants that have been labelled GMO are a consequence of simple breeding for traits, that has been going
on since biblical times at least, and which, for example, originated
in the strawberry fruit which was cultivated in this manner over 200
years ago in France.
I know this because I have been in those laboratories and it was pointed out to me by the professor that this was all that they were doing. He did this to ask me to protect him from people that were panicking about GMO. To assert that it was
harmless breeding for traits. But they have to claim it is GMO or else the do not get funding.
As it is, if the genetic code was understood, the major priority would be splicing shark-genes, so that we can grow back our missing teeth. Surely that would be a greater priority than "genetically modifying" tomatoes to last longer on the shelf, even as they have become virtually without any discernible flavor.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 29, 2021 1:54:00 GMT
So white, black and asian people all share the exact same genetic profile if there differences are pure sophistry? People have known that white people produce white offspring, and black people produce black offspring since long before
the scientific method perfected by Newton; since long before the simplest microscope noticed cells.
What I am asking is:
What has modern theories on genes added to this basic observation?
What basic experiment can a person do to prove genetic theory?
Obviously this will be using plants or insects.
My assertion is that all plants that have been labelled GMO are a consequence of simple breeding for traits, that has been going
on since biblical times at least, and which, for example, originated
in the strawberry fruit which was cultivated in this manner over 200
years ago in France.
I know this because I have been in those laboratories and it was pointed out to me by the professor that this was all that they were doing. He did this to ask me to protect him from people that were panicking about GMO. To assert that it was
harmless breeding for traits. But they have to claim it is GMO or else the do not get funding.
As it is, if the genetic code was understood, the major priority would be splicing shark-genes, so that we can grow back our missing teeth. Surely that would be a greater priority than "genetically modifying" tomatoes to last longer on the shelf, even as they have become virtually without any discernible flavor.
I love homegrown tomatoes I would eat them with every meal unfortunately I don't eat tomatoes very often unless they're homegrown because once you have a homegrown tomato you don't eat those red balls of whatever they're called that are being sold to you as tomatoes in the store regardless of if you go to a health nut store or your local Walmart they all taste like crap if they have any flavor at all they usually just taste like a pulpy sponge with the essence of sink water and some snot and that's if you get a good one. My grandparents were real big into gardening when I was a child and they showed me a few ways to modify plants as well as grow plants for convenience purposes and also told me how certain things were GMO and a lot of the time is all it is is changing the environment the plant grows up in for several plant generations and or stem splicing for root splicing alongside stressful and/or ideal climate situations and taking the seeds from the more desirable fruit that is obtained from that and continuing the process until eventually you end up with a seed that does what you want to do AKA it has more flavor or it's more purple or things like that.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Sept 29, 2021 21:12:42 GMT
People have known that white people produce white offspring, and black people produce black offspring since long before
the scientific method perfected by Newton; since long before the simplest microscope noticed cells.
What I am asking is:
What has modern theories on genes added to this basic observation?
What basic experiment can a person do to prove genetic theory?
Obviously this will be using plants or insects.
My assertion is that all plants that have been labelled GMO are a consequence of simple breeding for traits, that has been going
on since biblical times at least, and which, for example, originated
in the strawberry fruit which was cultivated in this manner over 200
years ago in France.
I know this because I have been in those laboratories and it was pointed out to me by the professor that this was all that they were doing. He did this to ask me to protect him from people that were panicking about GMO. To assert that it was
harmless breeding for traits. But they have to claim it is GMO or else the do not get funding.
As it is, if the genetic code was understood, the major priority would be splicing shark-genes, so that we can grow back our missing teeth. Surely that would be a greater priority than "genetically modifying" tomatoes to last longer on the shelf, even as they have become virtually without any discernible flavor.
I love homegrown tomatoes I would eat them with every meal unfortunately I don't eat tomatoes very often unless they're homegrown because once you have a homegrown tomato you don't eat those red balls of whatever they're called that are being sold to you as tomatoes in the store regardless of if you go to a health nut store or your local Walmart they all taste like crap if they have any flavor at all they usually just taste like a pulpy sponge with the essence of sink water and some snot and that's if you get a good one. My grandparents were real big into gardening when I was a child and they showed me a few ways to modify plants as well as grow plants for convenience purposes and also told me how certain things were GMO and a lot of the time is all it is is changing the environment the plant grows up in for several plant generations and or stem splicing for root splicing alongside stressful and/or ideal climate situations and taking the seeds from the more desirable fruit that is obtained from that and continuing the process until eventually you end up with a seed that does what you want to do AKA it has more flavor or it's more purple or things like that. University is such a pack of lies.
I have formally been part of 14 separate departments and endured far more than that informally over a life time of study, and for years I thought it virtually a miracle that society does not fall apart due to the amount of garbage that gets funding for the sake of worse than mere cronyism.
Now the world is ripping itself apart with the scamdemic, and its such an endemic rot, that most people are still sucking up the sophistry into a giant bubble of bullshit.
We are headed for total disaster. Only a miracle can save this society from disintegration.
As the vikings say: Vísindin eru Dauð
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 30, 2021 9:25:58 GMT
I love homegrown tomatoes I would eat them with every meal unfortunately I don't eat tomatoes very often unless they're homegrown because once you have a homegrown tomato you don't eat those red balls of whatever they're called that are being sold to you as tomatoes in the store regardless of if you go to a health nut store or your local Walmart they all taste like crap if they have any flavor at all they usually just taste like a pulpy sponge with the essence of sink water and some snot and that's if you get a good one. My grandparents were real big into gardening when I was a child and they showed me a few ways to modify plants as well as grow plants for convenience purposes and also told me how certain things were GMO and a lot of the time is all it is is changing the environment the plant grows up in for several plant generations and or stem splicing for root splicing alongside stressful and/or ideal climate situations and taking the seeds from the more desirable fruit that is obtained from that and continuing the process until eventually you end up with a seed that does what you want to do AKA it has more flavor or it's more purple or things like that. University is such a pack of lies.
I have formally been part of 14 separate departments and endured far more than that informally over a life time of study, and for years I thought it virtually a miracle that society does not fall apart due to the amount of garbage that gets funding for the sake of worse than mere cronyism.
Now the world is ripping itself apart with the scamdemic, and its such an endemic rot, that most people are still sucking up the sophistry into a giant bubble of bullshit.
We are headed for total disaster. Only a miracle can save this society from disintegration.
As the vikings say: Vísindin eru Dauð
I can't relate to your experience with school because I never was given an education so in a way I guess I was lucky yet it does create a sort of Innocence due to lack of experience on my part but it helped me and gave me time to develop my own opinion on life before the world dumped a million opinions on me that I should model after Funny thing I heard about the scam dimmick beer flu is that the shot that was approved wasn't the shot that people are getting in America so the one that is being supplied in America is not under standard FDA approval criteria and so if anybody has any side effects or injuries occurring from it they can't sue or do anything about it because it's not an approved FDA drug although one identical to it that's used in Europe was approved it doesn't cover ours but the media so lovely in their wording has convinced everybody that it does. I heard this from a chemist on YouTube who I trust pretty well he's pretty level-headed he thinks the entire thing is bullshit to the 10th degree and he's an organic chemist if that adds any validity
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Sept 30, 2021 12:45:07 GMT
MAYA-EL Yup, the scamdemic is certainly quite an atrocity of ignorance and arrogance fueled by the worship of money; propped up by ever greater degrees of lies and corruption... alll based on an unsustainable economic model that is buoyed by an unsustainable population boom. Its been quite a roller-coaster ride, the last 25 years; as i was doing honors philosophy in 1996, the same year i first sent an email; it became clear just how corrupt academia was. Trying to pursue philosophy of science and philosophy of ethics in a place where those words were just a veneer for corruption. Initially I thought i was just living in a backwater; little more than a farming colony. So instead i went into webdesign as the www was taking off, and I started to see just how bad the rest of the world was; even worse than a farm. At least a farm produces food. The www was itself just scam after scam, and most prospective clients were just trying to get me to build scam websites of every type. So that is why i decided to just stick to my own project in computational astrophysics, only to prove that gravity must be traversing at a velocity no less than a million times light-speed ...
...in 2017 just as they award the nobel prize in physics for a bogus claim that gravity only moves at light-speed. But the computational astrophysics hinges on n-body-gravity which was always the precursor to a biological algorithm which is vastly more complex in processing, even tho the formula itself is little different; just with millions of times more particles - thus requiring more powerful processing. But to do this I needed to have a foundational grasp of the details of microbiology. In doing so, it became apparent how much sheer gobbledigook virology really is whilst using Ebola and HPV as the benchmark studies. So as I am seeing the whole charade for the pack of lies it is; then the whole scamdemic kicks in. Its like I am surfing a Tsunami, that always threatens to break, but it never does; just getting bigger and bigger and bigger...
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 30, 2021 16:42:24 GMT
MAYA-EL Yup, the scamdemic is certainly quite an atrocity of ignorance and arrogance fueled by the worship of money; propped up by ever greater degrees of lies and corruption... alll based on an unsustainable economic model that is buoyed by an unsustainable population boom. Its been quite a roller-coaster ride, the last 25 years; as i was doing honors philosophy in 1996, the same year i first sent an email; it became clear just how corrupt academia was. Trying to pursue philosophy of science and philosophy of ethics in a place where those words were just a veneer for corruption. Initially I thought i was just living in a backwater; little more than a farming colony. So instead i went into webdesign as the www was taking off, and I started to see just how bad the rest of the world was; even worse than a farm. At least a farm produces food. The www was itself just scam after scam, and most prospective clients were just trying to get me to build scam websites of every type. So that is why i decided to just stick to my own project in computational astrophysics, only to prove that gravity must be traversing at a velocity no less than a million times light-speed ...
...in 2017 just as they award the nobel prize in physics for a bogus claim that gravity only moves at light-speed. But the computational astrophysics hinges on n-body-gravity which was always the precursor to a biological algorithm which is vastly more complex in processing, even tho the formula itself is little different; just with millions of times more particles - thus requiring more powerful processing. But to do this I needed to have a foundational grasp of the details of microbiology. In doing so, it became apparent how much sheer gobbledigook virology really is whilst using Ebola and HPV as the benchmark studies. So as I am seeing the whole charade for the pack of lies it is; then the whole scamdemic kicks in. Its like I am surfing a Tsunami, that always threatens to break, but it never does; just getting bigger and bigger and bigger... Question. Do you have an explanation or reason as to why light seems to slow down when it goes through certain substances and then speed back up ? I also saw an experiment where they had three lenses that were tinted for whatever reason when they added the third lens instead of getting darker it got lighter so it was darker with two lenses and not the third one I really wish I could find the video to show you and I hope you know what I'm talking about but it was a very odd characteristic
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Oct 1, 2021 14:16:16 GMT
MAYA-ELThis is the experiment you mention, I'm pretty sure. There are quite a few others just like it too, so its certainly a real phenomenon. I have a pretty good idea of why it occurs, and thanks, you have motivated me to make a video explaining it. As for why photons slow down, then speed up again, there are quite a few possible explanations, but it seems to be something along the lines of the photon being exchanged, so it gets absorbed, and then emitted again; or another photon gets emitted in its place. Perhaps the photon just does a single orbit around the nucleus of the atom; or something like that. I am still a bit unclear as to the charge of the photon being negative or positive? The electron is negative, the proton positive, so what charge is the photon?? I am also unclear about why primary colors exist. Most websites claim they do not exist except as a construct of the eye; but that is certainly wrong and the experiment to prove primary colors are real is so easy we even did it in junior school; as all it requires is a few colored objects and a few colored light-bulbs. These ideas are all tied in to one another, so i am trying to get a clear picture of it all before I begin to explain it. But sometimes trying to explain the unclear picture provokes the mind into seeing the clear picture. Another question is why some objects are transparent; that has never been satisfactorily explained to me. And this may be tied into making objects transparent to gravity: which is where my questions are leading...
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Oct 1, 2021 19:15:57 GMT
MAYA-ELThis is the experiment you mention, I'm pretty sure. There are quite a few others just like it too, so its certainly a real phenomenon. I have a pretty good idea of why it occurs, and thanks, you have motivated me to make a video explaining it. As for why photons slow down, then speed up again, there are quite a few possible explanations, but it seems to be something along the lines of the photon being exchanged, so it gets absorbed, and then emitted again; or another photon gets emitted in its place. Perhaps the photon just does a single orbit around the nucleus of the atom; or something like that. I am still a bit unclear as to the charge of the photon being negative or positive? The electron is negative, the proton positive, so what charge is the photon?? I am also unclear about why primary colors exist. Most websites claim they do not exist except as a construct of the eye; but that is certainly wrong and the experiment to prove primary colors are real is so easy we even did it in junior school; as all it requires is a few colored objects and a few colored light-bulbs. These ideas are all tied in to one another, so i am trying to get a clear picture of it all before I begin to explain it. But sometimes trying to explain the unclear picture provokes the mind into seeing the clear picture. Another question is why some objects are transparent; that has never been satisfactorily explained to me. And this may be tied into making objects transparent to gravity: which is where my questions are leading... Yes that's the video! Yeah I've never understood how you can have something that's strong enough to stop bullets and yet you can see right through it . Or the diamond for example I mean it's not exactly hollow yet almost invisible and virtually indestructible. Now under the theory of The ether the explanation would be that light is a field modality perturbation what is your thoughts on that?
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Oct 2, 2021 15:32:44 GMT
MAYA-ELWell, the Michelson-Morley experiment has been said to disprove ether, but there are serious problems with the interpretation of that experiment even if we take its empirical claims at face value. All that Michelson-Morley disproves is that there is no un-moving ether; no absolute substance with zero velocity which acts as a universal reference point. But the actual empirical claims of the experiment are still in-keeping with Galilean relativity; so long as we are happy to abandon light-speed as a universal absolute constant; or absolute speed limit. More on that in the video to follow here: My working theory on transparency involves 4d space. I am not happy with light as a field; and accept that light is a simply a particle. But whether field or particle anything that emits from a point will follow the inverse of the square principle - BECAUSE it is confined to 3D space. See this article for details on that: www.flight-light-and-spin.com/force-of-gravity.htmBut seeing as though we must accept that light is confined to 3D space because it follows the inverse of the square principle, and if we accept that the universe has a 4D spatial structure to it, we can deduce one reason to explain transparency. Details on 4D shape of universe here: www.flight-light-and-spin.com/simulator/universe-shape.htmSimply put, all objects have a very narrow amount of 4D space, but if that sliver of 4D space is shifted by a small amount in 4D space, then the light simply moves past the object in 4D space. (Also read Edwin Abbot Abbot "Flatland" - should be free online) Of course that is just an explanation that works mathematically and does not contradict itself; so it may not be the reason why transparency exists. But if it is true, then we also have our foot in the door to making objects transparent to gravity, because gravity is also confined to 3D space because gravity also follows the inverse of the square law! Its all fairly theoretical. But if you accept Ether and your also want to uphold the integrity of Michelson-Morley, then I reckon you need to adjust Ether theory, and conclude that the ether through which light moves is itself moving with the Earth. Moving in relation to what, though? More on that in this article: www.flight-light-and-spin.com/simulator/relativity-planets-orbits.htmBut I still feel that the nature of primary colors and how that is worked into the electromagnetic-spectrum theory needs to be resolved before any real progress is made. Are there primary wavelengths of electromagnetic waves beyond light? Much like primary colors? That I do not know. ;-j
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Oct 3, 2021 17:38:46 GMT
Hmmmm I will look into this Michelson-Morley experiment you speak of.
I don't necessarily stick to the ether theory Although I do lean twords it more then atomism do to my own personal findings during deep meditation Which seem along the lines of the ether theory
But wouldn't the ether still be made out of articles of something? Idk
I have my own hypothesis on existence but it's not a popular one so I tend to keep it to my self at least until I can find some more examples to backup my theory more.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Oct 4, 2021 19:11:54 GMT
The Michelson-Morley experiment has a problem IMO
They pre assume that the ether has certain characteristics which they will try and test for and if they aren't found then it supposedly proves that the ether doesn't exist
But they are only guessing and that's where the dumbass flaws are in the experiment
|
|