|
Post by jonbain on Aug 1, 2021 19:08:42 GMT
As for my first assertion, can anyone here PROVE that genetics is anything more than pseudo-science?
In specific all the racial classification going on,
which to me simply looks like the sophistry of racism.
Is there an experiment I can actually do that has some meaningful use here?
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 17, 2021 2:06:35 GMT
ElizabethDo you still accept Einstein was a real scientist? Answer this: If two photons depart a lightbulb in opposite directions, then after 1 second they are 600 000 km apart. What is their velocity in comparison to one another? What would Einstein answer? Yes, only because everyone is a scientist to some extent. It just depends how well one looks for answers.
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on Aug 17, 2021 4:47:48 GMT
Answer this: If two photons depart a lightbulb in opposite directions, then after 1 second they are 600 000 km apart. What is their velocity in comparison to one another? I am probably an idiot for bothering to answer, but anyway... In general relativity, velocity is only in comparison to the frame of reference. hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Relativ/einvel2.html
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 17, 2021 5:26:32 GMT
I don't really know about the genetics, but the classification isn't science. You can index all your files on your computer and order them in a certain sequence. Does it make you a scientist? By observing a set of phenomenon and dividing them into which parts relate one is practicing the act of science. Science and classification are the same in many respect. Dividing my files into an index of relations under a certain sequence is order the files under a specific science. This science is the observation of "x" files under "y" relationship. In one way I agree with you, because, indeed, what is science if not creating matrixes or tables (i.e. any other kind of functional representation)? But just think about it (including Wittgenstein I here) – if the world is just and only a gathering of things, than what are they? We're not making any sense claiming 'xRy', 'xRx', etc. Any of such forma have sense only being interpreted and tied with the world. There is no reason to create just cobwebs. In other words, not adding mind to this process you risk to say – science can be performed by computers. Is that so? – No. Apes don't do science, and so don't spiders.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Aug 17, 2021 10:11:05 GMT
xxxxxxxxx1. Any strict set of relationships is reducible to a straight line graph. 2. Partially I agree, but genealogies have no important reason to be considered, and the prime motive of faith is to observe ethics or morals, whereas genetics serves only to divide people for purposes of racism: genocide. 3. The passing on of traits is something noted even in the book of Genesis, but the arbitrary classifications of the geneticists - with the assumption of an underlying genetic structure, serves no real purpose other than the careers of those making these fairly random classifications.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Aug 17, 2021 10:12:18 GMT
Elizabeth Do you still accept Einstein was a real scientist? Answer this: If two photons depart a lightbulb in opposite directions, then after 1 second they are 600 000 km apart. What is their velocity in comparison to one another? What would Einstein answer? Yes, only because everyone is a scientist to some extent. It just depends how well one looks for answers. Can you answer the 2nd question please?
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Aug 17, 2021 10:16:14 GMT
Answer this: If two photons depart a lightbulb in opposite directions, then after 1 second they are 600 000 km apart. What is their velocity in comparison to one another? I am probably an idiot for bothering to answer, but anyway... In general relativity, velocity is only in comparison to the frame of reference. All frames of reference can be considered. But the reference frame implied in the question is that of either of the photons.
(The method of science should be applicable to any subject matter.)
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Aug 17, 2021 15:58:56 GMT
Fake Victimization Is the Path to Power We avatars of color will take over Hollywood, the news media, and the universities. We will shame the principals at the lower-level schools by calling them avatarists if they refuse to teach Critical Sage Theory. After all, anyone who judges a post by the color of its avatar rather than by its content is uneducated. Yes, so why was there a drift to avatars from science being against Christ? Why Did You Drift to Virtue-Signaling to Race Traitors, Especially Since Liberals Are Anti-Christian?Typically projecting. You brought up "racism" as being related to genetics. That led to me showing how it is as illogical, dishonest, and dominance-seeking as "avatarism." It's also slavishly conformist to the self-appointed guides and their relentless mind-control.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 17, 2021 23:24:17 GMT
Yes, so why was there a drift to avatars from science being against Christ? Why Did You Drift to Virtue-Signaling to Race Traitors, Especially Since Liberals Are Anti-Christian?Typically projecting. You brought up "racism" as being related to genetics. That led to me showing how it is as illogical, dishonest, and dominance-seeking as "avatarism." It's also slavishly conformist to the self-appointed guides and their relentless mind-control. Well, genetics is genes and the make up of an individual. This includes physical traits like skin color too. Just skin color alone is not racism. I was saying those who dscriminate on skin color are racist. People can also discriminate on eye color, hair color, height, etc. Discrimination isn't limited to just skin color. That's all I meant.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 18, 2021 22:20:39 GMT
As for my first assertion, can anyone here PROVE that genetics is anything more than pseudo-science?
In specific all the racial classification going on,
which to me simply looks like the sophistry of racism.
Is there an experiment I can actually do that has some meaningful use here?
The passing on of "x" traits to "y" plants "z" percentage of the time is one experiment.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 18, 2021 22:24:01 GMT
xxxxxxxxx 1. Any strict set of relationships is reducible to a straight line graph. 2. Partially I agree, but genealogies have no important reason to be considered, and the prime motive of faith is to observe ethics or morals, whereas genetics serves only to divide people for purposes of racism: genocide. 3. The passing on of traits is something noted even in the book of Genesis, but the arbitrary classifications of the geneticists - with the assumption of an underlying genetic structure, serves no real purpose other than the careers of those making these fairly random classifications. 1. And that graph forms into branches. Under "y" circumstances "x" branching occurs. Under "a" circumstances "b" branching occurs. 2. Genetics is the passing on of traits, these traits (such as height, weight, eye color, mental disorders (such as bipolar)) are not limited to strictly a racial division. 3. The classifications are probabilistic in regards to point number 2.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Aug 19, 2021 8:57:43 GMT
As for my first assertion, can anyone here PROVE that genetics is anything more than pseudo-science?
In specific all the racial classification going on,
which to me simply looks like the sophistry of racism.
Is there an experiment I can actually do that has some meaningful use here?
The passing on of "x" traits to "y" plants "z" percentage of the time is one experiment. This is true, but the analysis originates from the book of Genesis, with everything giving birth "unto their kind" - and even man in the image of God - is another example of this process.
And so the claim is not part of 'genetic science' - people have been
planting seeds and breeding animals since long before the word 'genetics', even those who never heard of the bible do this, those even without written language.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Aug 19, 2021 9:10:32 GMT
xxxxxxxxx 1. Any strict set of relationships is reducible to a straight line graph. 2. Partially I agree, but genealogies have no important reason to be considered, and the prime motive of faith is to observe ethics or morals, whereas genetics serves only to divide people for purposes of racism: genocide. 3. The passing on of traits is something noted even in the book of Genesis, but the arbitrary classifications of the geneticists - with the assumption of an underlying genetic structure, serves no real purpose other than the careers of those making these fairly random classifications. 1. And that graph forms into branches. Under "y" circumstances "x" branching occurs. Under "a" circumstances "b" branching occurs. 2. Genetics is the passing on of traits, these traits (such as height, weight, eye color, mental disorders (such as bipolar)) are not limited to strictly a racial division. 3. The classifications are probabilistic in regards to point number 2. Bipolar mental disorder is little different to post-traumatic-stress disorder, it has no genetic basis - its purely a psychological consequence of trauma.
That genetic classification claims such ideas their own, is fairly typical of those who perpetuate the racist fallacy: considering their classifications to be a separation of "superior" and "inferior" genes: racism. Height and weight is a consequence of nutrition as much as anything
in terms of human qualities. But this is regarding the human sphere of genetics.
However, we can see here
... that breeding animals for traits is a process that was known long before anybody came up with genetic classifications, regardless of the imperfection in the understanding or the clumsiness of the wording - the process originates from ideas that have nothing to do with genetic science.
What specifically has genetic science added to this obvious process?
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Aug 19, 2021 18:21:54 GMT
Why Did You Drift to Virtue-Signaling to Race Traitors, Especially Since Liberals Are Anti-Christian?Typically projecting. You brought up "racism" as being related to genetics. That led to me showing how it is as illogical, dishonest, and dominance-seeking as "avatarism." It's also slavishly conformist to the self-appointed guides and their relentless mind-control. Well, genetics is genes and the make up of an individual. This includes physical traits like skin color too. Just skin color alone is not racism. I was saying those who dscriminate on skin color are racist. People can also discriminate on eye color, hair color, height, etc. Discrimination isn't limited to just skin color. That's all I meant. The Upper Class Turns the Bottom-Feeders Loose on the Middle
Nobody discriminates based on skin color. The race traitors have to use their ridiculous and insulting lie because they have no rational grounds to stand on in disproving natural racial inferiority. Does a White who gets a suntan get picked on? But liars refuse to budge from their false and dishonest accusation, so it is impossible to reason with them through analogies.
Liberals are weakling goofy misfits who hate normal Whites for rejecting them. Bitter and jealous, they wreck our society in order to get even. They must be stripped of all political power. Without majority rule, we not only have tyranny but are so overpowered mentally and emotionally that we accept it. We, the people, never would have passed the 1964 Civil Rights for the Uncivilized Act, so we must overthrow the system that allowed it to become law.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 19, 2021 18:34:25 GMT
Well, genetics is genes and the make up of an individual. This includes physical traits like skin color too. Just skin color alone is not racism. I was saying those who dscriminate on skin color are racist. People can also discriminate on eye color, hair color, height, etc. Discrimination isn't limited to just skin color. That's all I meant. The Upper Class Turns the Bottom-Feeders Loose on the Middle
Nobody discriminates based on skin color. A lot used to in the past especially. That is how we had slavery in America. The dark skin colored people became slaves and had no rights simply because of their color. They still get discriminated today but it isn't that common. Sometimes! . My brother is white but works in the sun and is tanned. Some thought he was Mexican before or something.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 23, 2021 22:34:58 GMT
The passing on of "x" traits to "y" plants "z" percentage of the time is one experiment. This is true, but the analysis originates from the book of Genesis, with everything giving birth "unto their kind" - and even man in the image of God - is another example of this process.
And so the claim is not part of 'genetic science' - people have been
planting seeds and breeding animals since long before the word 'genetics', even those who never heard of the bible do this, those even without written language.
Genetics is the study of traits which passes down from one organism to another. In these respects, even though the term genetics was not coined, genetics has existed as one form of science or another since time began.
|
|