How the Norse Became Christian

karl , I find it interesting that the early church started as a grassroots bottom to top work, but later conversion became a top to bottom work. Do you think that these are both valid methods, each with its pros and cons, or is it only the bottom to top work thats the "Right way" while the Top to bottom is detrimental to the quality of Christianity expressed among the people?

What country are you from?

Hmm. It's not Christian to all denominations then. I say this because mine would reject it. Like what does Norse stand for? Come on. Can't be Christian.

That makes more sense. Wish I knew history at times. But you don't look too much of a historian there Mr. Rich Business Owner xD

Well this particular Viking, me, was converted to Christianity in 2006.
And this only occurred through direct communion with the spirits of both
Jesus and John the Baptist.

I was given no instruction to shun Norse culture.
And I retain the invocation of Thor for the sole specific use of dealing
with fake Christians - aTheists who pretend otherwise deserve only to
meet the full face of Mjolnir in all its pagan glory.

Its a fascinating topic to me, but the video is rife with saxon propaganda.
Only a sassenach boot-licker would term the Norse as germanic. Even today
Denmark has a border with Europe - and that division predates the very
concept of germany. Those cultures are very different specifically with
the Norse respecting the role of women, whereas the germanic tradition
is to subjugate all and sundry.

The other glaring misconception is to fail to see the connection between
the Celts of Ireland and Scotland and the Norse. When the Vikings arrived
in Britain there was little conflict with the Scots by comparison, who
incorporated the Norse far more readily than the anglo-saxons. Those sassenach
typically just pretend that 'the Vikings just arrived and attacked us for
no reason and raped the women'. This is the pervasive myth of the false
Christian sassenach, because they were notoriously raping scots Christian women,
and projected their own sins on the Norse. It seems clear to me that the
Scots/Celts really invited the Norse to help them boot out the germanic saxon
invaders and their false Christian double standards. Of course there were
a few conflicts with the scots, as there was across all cultures in those days.

Their is a world of difference between an authentic pagan and a lying aTheist.

Even today the cultural difference between saxon and Norse/Celt is evident;
although it is neo-cultural in that it exists as ethical choices made by
individuals who share a genetic lineage to all the tribes of Europe
for the most part. But the difference being ethical: mostly a sense
of hierarchical saxon monetization of even the very water we drink!

Whereas the egalitarian nature of Celt and Norse is entirely different
to that. Even ww2 was fought along precisely those lines, and the
ethical difference still exists within interpretations of Christianity;
with saxon culture typically making every attempt to subjugate women and
anyone who is not part of their hierarchical paradigm and its piss-pot
hairstyles, shoes shining from bootlicking, and clean-shaven faces
emulating those of the faces of women - a subconsciously sodomite culture
of egotism, with their desire of subjugation being of a subtle
nature. Of course the chauvinist sassenach has a domineering attitude
towards women and other 'races' due to his own inferiority complex.

Your whole rant is just historically incorrect. There was very little to separate the Anglo Saxons from the Scandinavians in the dark ages regarding culture. The Anglo Saxons came to England from Denmark and Germany and shared the culture of Denmark and Northern Germany. The "Sassenach" worshipped Thor and Odin, had mead halls, had a social structure of Earls, curls, and slaves in the same manner as the Norse Jarls, Karls, and Thralls, they fought exactly the same way on the battlefield with the shield wall, they both spoke a Germanic language, they had similar beliefs about mythical creatures, they shared epic stories in common, and were similar in countless other ways. The only difference really was that the Anglo Saxons converted to Christianity far earlier. England was pretty much a Scandinavian nation until the Normans arrived and conquered them in 1066. 

The Germanic tribes of continental Europe also had their cultural origins in Scandinavia worshipping the same gods, having the same social structure, having a related language etc. Germanic culture originated in Scandinavia and spread when the Scandinavians invaded the Celtic lands of what is now modern day Germany conquering, interbreeding with, and culturally assimilating the Celtic tribes that were living there. The Anglo Saxons which you seem to have a grudge against spread from Northern Germany and Denmark to Britain. Northern Germany and Denmark at that time were pretty much culturally indistinguishable at that time so when they got to Britain, they got on very well and merged quite comfortably into the group we now call the English.