|
Post by katsung47 on Nov 26, 2017 1:42:28 GMT
Russia Wanted Trump As President And It Got Him. Now What Does America Do? ,HuffPost• November 22, 2017 On Jan. 6, 2017, the U.S. intelligence community released a declassified version of its analysis finding that Russian President Vladimir Putin had not only interfered in the 2016 election, but had actively tried to help Trump. Among the tools Russia used was the theft of emails from the campaign of Trump’s opponent, Hillary Clinton, and their release through Russia-friendly WikiLeaks. Trump campaign foreign policy aide George Papadopoulos detailed in filings associated with his guilty plea agreement how Russians in April 2016 were offering the campaign emails damaging to Clinton. Emails between the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., and a former business partner show that the younger Trump was eager to see the supposedly incriminating information in advance of a Trump Tower meeting. Trump Jr. later traded messages with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange about his father’s exploitation of emails stolen from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. On Oct. 12, 2016, after Assange suggested that the GOP nominee help publicize the latest batch of stolen emails, Trump himself sent a tweet praising WikiLeaks just 15 minutes later. On May 9, 2017, after three months of complaining about the FBI’s Russia probe, Trump fired the agency’s director, James Comey. The reason initially stated was that Comey had mishandled an investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state. But the very next day, Trump reportedly told Russia’s foreign minister and its U.S. ambassador during an Oval Office visit that he’d fired Comey to block the probe. Trump again cited the Russia investigation as a reason for firing Comey in an interview with NBC News on May 11. That firing led quickly to Mueller’s appointment to take over the investigation. www.yahoo.com/news/russia-wanted-trump-president-got-100030401.html
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Mar 3, 2018 13:51:47 GMT
Putin demanded that the US formally pass on data on Russia's interference in the elections:In an interview with NBC, Russian President Vladimir Putin demanded that the US side provide official documents proving the guilt of Russian citizens in "interfering" in the presidential elections in the US in 2016. According to him, for criminal prosecution in Russia, an official request to the Russian Prosecutor General is needed. "This should go through official channels, not through the press or screams and cries in the US Congress," Putin added. A very correct remark otherwise this just looks like a stupid and dramatic American show for the whole world! www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/exclusive-putin-addresses-2016-election-meddling-1175502915757
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2018 21:04:03 GMT
ΔιαμονδIt would be impossible for her to became a president. It is just impossible. The election was a setup, just like the previous one with Obama and McCain. What a fool believes in the honest election?!.. Dudes make money, they don't want to fail. Who would play a fair game?!.. Putin and Trump are just a pair of businessmen... What proofs do we need else?
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Mar 5, 2018 21:28:26 GMT
Διαμονδ It would be impossible for her to became a president. It is just impossible. The election was a setup, just like the previous one with Obama and McCain. What a fool believes in the honest election?!.. Dudes make money, they don't want to fail. Who would play a fair game?!.. Putin and Trump are just a pair of businessmen... What proofs do we need else? It is possible that she sponsors knew that Hillary will not work! But what did they calculate? on PR or provocation?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2018 21:48:09 GMT
ΔιαμονδFor almost every good writer, it is necessary to give more possibilities to be interpreted as more as they can. They do it to be more memorable, to become famous, etc. The same story in every ceremony or rituals, where we're just spectators of the action. So, as for me everything like this - PR or some intriguing things - are attributes of every good show. Since our politics has turned into the show (King's 'The Running Man' is the perfect example of it), we have not to pay attention on all these features. As you said it in one of the thread , here's the same situation. The logic, I guess, should be like this: The top has money; probably, money is what the top does to be the top. So, to be the top they're bothering about money, everything else is not so important as money. And I think it has always been like that before.
|
|
|
Post by katsung47 on Mar 11, 2018 23:37:01 GMT
971. Secret deal behind Russian's email hacking (7/22/2017)
Trump called Russians to hack Clinton's emails. He says now he didn't know Russians hacking deal. What was his base to call Russian to hack Clinton's email? Idea dropped from the sky?
Of course, Russian wouldn't give a free service. Six months later, Aleppo fell. A first payment to Russia after Trump won the president campaign. Rebel retreated in order. That was an arranged deal.
The full deal is done one year later. Tillerson's words means "Now we fulfill the deal. Syria is yours".
Meanwhile, US had a missile attack on Syria in the name that Syria had a chemical weapon violation, that was a cover up operation of the secret deal.
|
|
|
Post by katsung47 on Mar 24, 2018 23:07:10 GMT
Trump asks Russian to hack Hillary
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Mar 24, 2018 23:14:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nancymac on Mar 26, 2018 19:48:19 GMT
Everyone has their own opinion when it comes to politics, you might lean left or right? You might agree that the party is doing a great job? You might think that the president is a wooze or pussy? You might think how in all the world did he get elected? We the public are just puppets on what they want us to know or believe!!
|
|
|
Post by katsung47 on Apr 6, 2018 22:03:42 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 22:26:46 GMT
It seems they speculate in categories of 'who gets profit', or 'who wins by doing it'. So, regions are meaningless here. Also, we can thinking that 'there were some spies wanting to frame Russia', but this phrase being cut by Occam's razor becomes 'there were some spies... from Russia'. That's why question of 'who frames who?' waving by media becomes like that. Understanding that all media are corrupted, we can consider about it that all these things are maybe just a part of the great show... Media will have been always hoping that "Show must go on"
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Apr 6, 2018 22:30:58 GMT
It seems they speculate in categories of 'who gets profit', or 'who wins by doing it'. So, regions are meaningless here. Also, we can thinking that 'there were some spies wanting to frame Russia', but this phrase being cut by Occam's razor becomes 'there were some spies... from Russia'. That's why question of 'who frames who?' waving by media becomes like that. Understanding that all media are corrupted, we can consider about it that all these things are maybe just a part of the great show... Media will have been always hoping that "Show must go on" This is the famous American geographo-cretinism! Shrug There are many such examples!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2018 23:06:31 GMT
It seems they speculate in categories of 'who gets profit', or 'who wins by doing it'. So, regions are meaningless here. Also, we can thinking that 'there were some spies wanting to frame Russia', but this phrase being cut by Occam's razor becomes 'there were some spies... from Russia'. That's why question of 'who frames who?' waving by media becomes like that. Understanding that all media are corrupted, we can consider about it that all these things are maybe just a part of the great show... Media will have been always hoping that "Show must go on" This is the famous American geographo-cretinism! There are many such examples! It's possible, but... why is cretinism?.. It is very offend diagnose. Surely, USA has many enemies around the world, however Russian interests in Trump are great. But despite of these interests, well, it's not a secret that Hillary is just a douchebag, that's why she's not been chosen. There were no decent candidates from the two, but Trump looked like better to be. At least he ruled a Casino empire, and was a businessman for a long time; even having many debts, he flew. In this way, my thought on it: a) Trump won either by Russians, or not - this is a good topic for discussions in media; b) Trump would win without help from aside. (Except a help from his daughter's husband.)
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Apr 6, 2018 23:09:47 GMT
This is the famous American geographo-cretinism! There are many such examples! It's possible, but... why is cretinism?.. It is very offend diagnose. Surely, USA has many enemies around the world, however Russian interests in Trump are great. But despite of these interests, well, it's not a secret that Hillary is just a douchebag, that's why she's not been chosen. There were no decent candidates from the two, but Trump looked like better to be. At least he ruled a Casino empire, and was a businessman for a long time; even having many debts, he flew. In this way, my thought on it: a) Trump won either by Russians, or not - this is a good topic for discussions in media; b) Trump would win without help from aside. (Except a help from his daughter's husband.)
|
|
|
Post by katsung47 on Apr 21, 2018 0:15:27 GMT
930. FBI activate a coup (11/6/2016)
I had such information from internet:
Apparently, Comey under the pressure of FBI officials to re-open investigation on Clinton's email case. That's an open interference in election. The purpose is to help their candidate - Trump to grab the power seat of president. I think the FBI has big plan in next year.
From my point of view, it's no other than a coup. In dictatorship, the officials activate army to take over control. In US, they activate themselves - secret police.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Apr 21, 2018 0:48:41 GMT
Facebook data collection was also for getting people to vote for Trump wasn't it? They made last election so presented in such a way that it was the first election I didn't want to vote in. Not for Trump or Hilary. It was too "off" for me. And Trump even wants to be president forever. Why is everything set up to him being president? I don't like it one bit.
|
|