|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Feb 7, 2018 14:10:04 GMT
For me, Augustus and Constantine the Great!
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2018 14:24:08 GMT
I like Roman history better when they were republic than empire period, so I will pick a statesman and a general - Publius Cornelius Scipio.
|
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Feb 7, 2018 14:33:30 GMT
I like Roman history better when they were republic than empire period, so I will pick a statesman and a general - Publius Cornelius Scipio. From the Roman history of that time, Julius Caesar was great for me! |
|
|
|
Post by AmericanCharm on Feb 7, 2018 14:44:49 GMT
Augustus Of Rome
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2018 14:49:01 GMT
I always was excited of what Gaius Mucius Scaevola' did. He is a real stoic.
I also read Mark Avrelius' 'Thinkings' (I spell it from the russian analog).
I don't like Seneca, 'cause of his character. And honestly, most of characters in Roman history
are impressive but I can't say I love them, I'd rather hate them. And I'm glad
that Rome was taken by barbarians, goths and the others. Augustin wrote in his monumental work,
that romanians at the time he lived were more worse than the christian outsiders.
What life of roman's were then? To go to the 'theatre' and to see christians will be torn apart in
arena with lions... It reminds me present times, just the arena has changed to the television
arena with the same applouses and the same stupid watchers of the show...
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2018 14:50:33 GMT
I like Roman history better when they were republic than empire period, so I will pick a statesman and a general - Publius Cornelius Scipio. From the Roman history of that time, Julius Caesar was great for me! Scipio lived a century before Julius Caesar |
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Feb 7, 2018 23:41:45 GMT
From the Roman history of that time, Julius Caesar was great for me! Scipio lived a century before Julius Caesar I'm talking about the era of the Roman Republic! |
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP 
Elder
Posts: 2,698 
Likes: 1,758
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Feb 8, 2018 2:47:14 GMT
Caesar Augustus.
|
|
Mocha
Full Member
Posts: 194
Likes: 128
Meta-Ethnicity: Coffee
Ethnicity: Caffè Latte
Ancestry: 90% Milk / 6% Cocoa Powder / 4% Espresso
Relationship Status: Caffeinated
Age: Freshly Brewed
|
Post by Mocha on Feb 8, 2018 3:04:47 GMT
Tough, but gonna say Hadrian. But really, any of the five good emperors are close behind.
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2018 17:40:51 GMT
For me, Augustus and Constantine the Great! It would depend on what time period what Rome was in. If it was the WRE and ERE period, it would be Justinian I, because he reclaimed most of the borders of the old Roman Empire. With the ERE, it would have to be... none of them, because they were all trash. |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2018 17:57:20 GMT
For me, Augustus and Constantine the Great! It would depend on what time period what Rome was in. If it was the WRE and ERE period, it would be Justinian I, because he reclaimed most of the borders of the old Roman Empire. With the ERE, it would have to be... none of them, because they were all trash. Its only historic term. Romans never called their empires ERE or WRE. |
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Mar 27, 2018 18:45:39 GMT
It would depend on what time period what Rome was in. If it was the WRE and ERE period, it would be Justinian I, because he reclaimed most of the borders of the old Roman Empire. With the ERE, it would have to be... none of them, because they were all trash. Its only historic term. Romans never called their empires ERE or WRE. Byzantium was a part and heir of the Roman empire .... Justinian was a worthy emperor! |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2018 21:24:21 GMT
Its only historic term. Romans never called their empires ERE or WRE. Byzantium was a part and heir of the Roman empire .... Justinian was a worthy emperor! Byzantine Empire was Roman Empire. The emperor of Constantinople never considered themselves Byzantine. |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2018 23:14:24 GMT
It would depend on what time period what Rome was in. If it was the WRE and ERE period, it would be Justinian I, because he reclaimed most of the borders of the old Roman Empire. With the ERE, it would have to be... none of them, because they were all trash. Its only historic term. Romans never called their empires ERE or WRE. I know it wasn't, it's better to call it by modern terms than the successor kingdom or Byzantine Empire because the majority of people don't know what Byzantine means. ERE or WRE give an idea of what they were. ERE is the Eastern Roman Empire and WRE is the Western Roman Empire. |
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on Mar 28, 2018 6:28:01 GMT
Justinian was a worthy emperor! Not according to Procopius. Do you believe his "Secret History"? |
|
