Supermentalita
Full Member
''A man destined to hang can never drown''
Posts: 275
Likes: 216
Meta-Ethnicity: Caucasian
Ethnicity: Dutch
Country: Poland
Politics: Identitarian
Religion: Christianity
Relationship Status: Single
Hero: Vlad Tepes, John Knox, John III Sobieski, Milorad 'Legija' Ulemek, Theo van Gogh, Tuvia Bielski
Age: 25
|
Post by Supermentalita on Dec 26, 2017 20:35:59 GMT
Science and faith are not on the opposite side of the fence and Christians are responsible for many scientific breakthroughs, says Rob Mutsaerts, the auxiliary bishop of the diocese of ‘s Hertogenbosch.
www.dutchnews.nl/features/2017/12/christianity-has-fostered-much-in-the-way-of-scientific-progress/Richard Dawkins, advocate of scientific and rational thought, is calling on everyone, and people of faith in particular, to think for themselves. People who believe in God do not think for themselves, he claims, and are cowardly and lazy to boot.
Perhaps this is a good time to remind him that Thomas of Aquino promoted Aristotle, that devout priest Copernicus was a mathematician and astronomer who formulated a heliocentric model and that Gregor Mendel, a monk, studied heredity and as such can be considered a precursor of Darwin. Newton, Kepler, Descartes and Pascal, devout Christians all, were the founders of modern science. And what to make of 19th century physicists Faraday, Maxwell and the man who proposed the big bang theory, a priest called Lemaître? And what about religious scientists such as C.S. Lewis and G.K. Chesterton? Christian Europe
The modern sciences originated in Christian milieus, in Christian Europe, in the very place where people believed in a world created by god which, by its nature, was open to reason and thus worth exploring. Catholicism is not an enemy to science, as Dawkins has it, and has never tended to defend itself from its claims. The church has always held that because creation springs from the one creator, there can be no conflict between the biblically revealed truth and the truth that we discover with our brain. Whatever the findings of empirical science, they will not give rise to a conflict with faith. The so-called battle between science and faith is an imaginary one. The brilliant atheist Bernard Shaw directly opposed Dawkins. Shaw said he could never be a Catholic because of its extreme rationalism. He had a sense of humour – ‘I’m an atheist and I thank God for it’- something that Dawkins clearly lacks. Shaw was right: the Catholic Church has never said that reason was not the right way to know reality, or that people have the right to approach anything in an unreasoned way.
|
|