|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 12, 2023 15:16:53 GMT
Aristotle assured everyone that if we knew truth, we knew formulas or sentences that expressed them, therefore we could predict things, and to calculate things. Well, this seems fine until we deal with Chinese devices, tools, or anything. (Not only the Chinese things, but mostly.)
Actually theories do not work at all. This is a total crap that there are theories. Nothing like theories cannot be uttered, spelled, or exposed, nobody knows the whole truth, and there is absolutely no signs we will be able to. Who told there were the truth anyway?
Especially we can doubt in theories when we're doing something. If we try to create something making it works, not rarely we fail. Humanity survives only doing harshly trillions of mistakes. Just by that we can reach anything sane. Labs, academies, schools – all of these and more aren't a complete nonsense, but it's fairly close to it.
That is why practically it is really the best to ask people, to watch, to observe, and to check it by yourself, instead of waste your time reading tons of wastepapers. Many academies are only to fool, and to request for more cash. The same is about millions of products: either what is being sold is just abstractions, plain, or easy things, or it works rarely.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Nov 15, 2023 19:47:13 GMT
The reason why almost all such papers utterly dull, is that my thesis has not won the Nobel prize yet.
But I have great news! I have a publisher, and am reworking through the book to improve the overall quality of the graphics, as some of it was more pragmatical than aesthetically inclined towards the 'market'.
There should be updates to the website soon, and hopefully sometime next year there will be some books actually on real paper out there.
Then we can blow all the bumbklaat out of the water, and get on with colonizing the stars, like we are supposed to be.
Give academia a good intellectual enema.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 15, 2023 19:55:07 GMT
The reason why almost all such papers utterly dull, is that my thesis has not won the Nobel prize yet. But I have great news! I have a publisher, and am reworking through the book to improve the overall quality of the graphics, as some of it was more pragmatical than aesthetically inclined towards the 'market'. There should be updates to the website soon, and hopefully sometime next year there will be some books actually on real paper out there. Then we can blow all the bumbklaat out of the water, and get on with colonizing the stars, like we are supposed to be. Give academia a good intellectual enema. It would be more, than cool, if I could understand physics, and your works in particular, but I can't. From my point of view the efforts you've put to the project are impressive. This is what really matters. Personally I would never ever dream about any nobel prizes or kinda, because they are mostly social.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 21, 2023 20:13:18 GMT
We ignor so much abd say that it doesn't exist because we use the framework of the scientific method and if the scientific method cant count it and controll it and repeat it then it says that it doesn't exist
Such an ignorant way to go through life
Who said the scientific method was the real way to find whats real? Its just a style a framework much like others such as religions use
But existence cant be fit through a framework without distortion and negation No matter which framework is used .
|
|