Sorry, Jonathan, but this is a section of philosophy. Please, try to post similar themes in other sections.
Need I quote the dictionary of philosophy that defines our purpose
as to discover the the nature of time, most specifically?
Redefining the essence of method in cosmology
is everything to do with philosophy.
How can we posit a philosophy of science on the basis of the
sheer rubbish of Einsteinism?
Latest observations of deep space have disproven the Big Bang.
Philosophy of science is now without grounding,
as it has been, albeit unbeknownst to the squabbling masses.
Do I have to use the word epistemology instead of method?
The intersection between astrophysics and metaphysics is
everything to do with logic (or rather the lack thereof)
in academic teaching methods.
How can anyone immersed in these fields not see that?