|
Presence
May 16, 2023 15:17:39 GMT
via mobile
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 16, 2023 15:17:39 GMT
Is it just an effect? Or this is something more, than just a feeling? Can we perceive or to feel the reality, the world around us more closer? It might be that all the time we've been living the life never even think about the presence in it. So, let's say we felt something that was closer to the presence, was it en effect, or some kind of another psychological trick, or this was more, than that?
What is also notable is that a person doesn't require to have devices or some other tools to do this, it's able to star doing it wherever you are. The problem is – how to do it, and how true is it. And the most dramatically here is that logical thinking here seems not a good friend – it's something inside, something very intimate.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 12, 2023 15:16:03 GMT
Change is something that everything is subject to but that does not mean that things past the individual portion of a thing has biodegraded and passed but not all of the things because everything is in a cyclical birth and death process now had you originally said everything that exists has changed that would have been correct but you didn't you said everything that exists passes and passes although similar to change is not exactly the same meaning and they're used differently although sometimes interchangeably and I believe you originally used the proper word to express your opinion but then I pound stamped you boom with one example that totally kicked your little tasty paste artwork project in the mud before the teachers could see it and that hurt so now you're changing the definition of what you said to try to desperately keep from having your statement curb stomped in less than 10 minutes of it being posted like I so did. It's okay not everybody has the Integrity to eat it when they're wrong I'll just hope that one day you'll acknowledge how wrong you are. The fact that everything is cyclical necessitates change as one thing repeating results in a new time and space of said thing repeating...this is change. What do you think of 'change', is it new for a system that's being under the change? I mean how a system can do something if that something is new to it? That something new might not fit to the system, it must be unfamiliar to the system. By that 'change' we are introducing that something. So, the very act of change doesn't belong to the system. Since there's no such changes for any system that previously be presented somehow in that system before, there's nothing in any systems (i.e. everywhere, if by a system we assume an arbitrary part of reality) or nothing changes, or if anything is being charged, then those changes must have been already supposed to occur (previously or potentially?)
|
|
|
Post by Polaris on Oct 13, 2023 16:04:02 GMT
Is it just an effect? Or this is something more, than just a feeling? Can we perceive or to feel the reality, the world around us more closer? It might be that all the time we've been living the life never even think about the presence in it. So, let's say we felt something that was closer to the presence, was it en effect, or some kind of another psychological trick, or this was more, than that? What is also notable is that a person doesn't require to have devices or some other tools to do this, it's able to star doing it wherever you are. The problem is – how to do it, and how true is it. And the most dramatically here is that logical thinking here seems not a good friend – it's something inside, something very intimate. I think the degree of presence or absence is decided by who draws the configuration of reality and how far is it from your personal sphere. It is by chance that you find yourself at the center of a certain reality without having contributed to that. To give you just one example, you're at the center of reality regarding Russian trespass on Ukraine.
|
|
|
Presence
Oct 13, 2023 17:28:22 GMT
via mobile
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 13, 2023 17:28:22 GMT
Is it just an effect? Or this is something more, than just a feeling? Can we perceive or to feel the reality, the world around us more closer? It might be that all the time we've been living the life never even think about the presence in it. So, let's say we felt something that was closer to the presence, was it en effect, or some kind of another psychological trick, or this was more, than that? What is also notable is that a person doesn't require to have devices or some other tools to do this, it's able to star doing it wherever you are. The problem is – how to do it, and how true is it. And the most dramatically here is that logical thinking here seems not a good friend – it's something inside, something very intimate. I think the degree of presence or absence is decided by who draws the configuration of reality and how far is it from your personal sphere. It is by chance that you find yourself at the center of a certain reality without having contributed to that. To give you just one example, you're at the center of reality regarding Russian trespass on Ukraine. Well, I saw Russian jets bombing living houses, and saw rockets flying from their side, and heard the blows, but I didn't see Russians troopers; it might happen, if I hadn't made a visit to see my parents previously. I agree that new reality was different, and it was sharply felt, this is true. However, I must say, the next morning (25 of February) I tried to force myself to imagine I had been dreaming, and that all was unreal. Not rarely there are some types of situations people don't want to accept. I would say there are things people want to forget, or they're looking for a chance to forget them.
|
|
|
Post by Polaris on Oct 13, 2023 17:38:47 GMT
I think the degree of presence or absence is decided by who draws the configuration of reality and how far is it from your personal sphere. It is by chance that you find yourself at the center of a certain reality without having contributed to that. To give you just one example, you're at the center of reality regarding Russian trespass on Ukraine. Well, I saw Russian jets bombing living houses, and saw rockets flying from their side, and heard the blows, but I didn't see Russians troopers; it might happen, if I hadn't made a visit to see my parents previously. I agree that new reality was different, and it was sharply felt, this is true. However, I must say, the next morning (25 of February) I tried to force myself to imagine I had been dreaming, and that all was unreal. Not rarely there are some types of situations people don't want to accept. I would say there are things people want to forget, or they're looking for a chance to forget them. So sorry to have brought to your memory those bad events, but what I wanted to say is that your consciousness of what is going on around you is shaped by those who have imposed a certain reality on you. You just woke up from sleep to find yourself in the middle of the new reality.
|
|
|
Presence
Oct 14, 2023 2:36:23 GMT
via mobile
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 14, 2023 2:36:23 GMT
Well, I saw Russian jets bombing living houses, and saw rockets flying from their side, and heard the blows, but I didn't see Russians troopers; it might happen, if I hadn't made a visit to see my parents previously. I agree that new reality was different, and it was sharply felt, this is true. However, I must say, the next morning (25 of February) I tried to force myself to imagine I had been dreaming, and that all was unreal. Not rarely there are some types of situations people don't want to accept. I would say there are things people want to forget, or they're looking for a chance to forget them. So sorry to have brought to your memory those bad events, but what I wanted to say is that your consciousness of what is going on around you is shaped by those who have imposed a certain reality on you. You just woke up from sleep to find yourself in the middle of the new reality. Oh, no, please, don't worry, that's okay. Would you agree if I said that each person could produce reality or involve others into it due his deeds? For instance, let's say my wife wants me to pay attention to her new dress or new look. Instead of doing it I don't say anything about her new look, I keep silence. (It doesn't necessary mean I do this intentionally. It might be that I've been tired all the time to notice anything.) If the wife's actions were to change the reality, so, were the actions of mine (keeping silence, avoiding her new look) such that changed the reality also? And if this is true, then it seems like any actions (that cause changes) of ours change reality, right?
|
|
|
Post by Polaris on Oct 14, 2023 14:19:03 GMT
So sorry to have brought to your memory those bad events, but what I wanted to say is that your consciousness of what is going on around you is shaped by those who have imposed a certain reality on you. You just woke up from sleep to find yourself in the middle of the new reality. Oh, no, please, don't worry, that's okay. Would you agree if I said that each person could produce reality or involve others into it due his deeds? For instance, let's say my wife wants me to pay attention to her new dress or new look. Instead of doing it I don't say anything about her new look, I keep silence. (It doesn't necessary mean I do this intentionally. It might be that I've been tired all the time to notice anything.) If the wife's actions were to change the reality, so, were the actions of mine (keeping silence, avoiding her new look) such that changed the reality also? And if this is true, then it seems like any actions (that cause changes) of ours change reality, right? Yes, I agree with you on how responding positively, negatively or inadvertently to your wife creates a sort of reality depending on how much your wife cares about your response hahaha
|
|
|
Presence
Oct 15, 2023 8:32:57 GMT
via mobile
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 15, 2023 8:32:57 GMT
Oh, no, please, don't worry, that's okay. Would you agree if I said that each person could produce reality or involve others into it due his deeds? For instance, let's say my wife wants me to pay attention to her new dress or new look. Instead of doing it I don't say anything about her new look, I keep silence. (It doesn't necessary mean I do this intentionally. It might be that I've been tired all the time to notice anything.) If the wife's actions were to change the reality, so, were the actions of mine (keeping silence, avoiding her new look) such that changed the reality also? And if this is true, then it seems like any actions (that cause changes) of ours change reality, right? Yes, I agree with you on how responding positively, negatively or inadvertently to your wife creates a sort of reality depending on how much your wife cares about your response hahaha May I ask you, please, what do you think about a human's exaggeration of things about realities? I mean not rarely people use mataphors, epithets, modifiers, or amplifiers for their speech, so maybe "the reality" is just an exaggerated amount of processes? Also, if you heard of Silvia Platt, she wrote diaries, and some novels, and poems, in which she put many efforts to make her works be as perfect as possible. She also was a big fan of Freud... Well, let me explain her behaviour in my way. I think that her (as well as some or even all writers) manners were to wake our imagination up, and to make us draw images within our souls or somewhere (where we apply our imagination activities). Just in my case, I am not a good writer, nor a good English user, that's why my messages are weak and plain. Doubtfully my comments enable someone's imagination with lots of flames. Time to time even an ordinary person use certain words to torch "the fire within us", while daily our speech is dressed in dramatically colourless clothes. If we call those different shades 'styles' we may say that some styles are able to make us writers if we would use them correctly and with talents. Okay, briefly saying, I guess that "the reality" in its most edge view for us is some sort of mixture of our imagination and the traces of the outer things multiplied by specifically painted words which functions is to make us use the imagination. And, besides, exactly that reason why we use this or that type of imagination (and how words can govern us) is the result of reflections previously taught by us. So, psychology can be viewed as a science that studies how we govern words and imaginations, and why we tie up certain symbols with certain reactions.
|
|
|
Post by Polaris on Oct 15, 2023 17:16:44 GMT
Yes, I agree with you on how responding positively, negatively or inadvertently to your wife creates a sort of reality depending on how much your wife cares about your response hahaha May I ask you, please, what do you think about a human's exaggeration of things about realities? I mean not rarely people use mataphors, epithets, modifiers, or amplifiers for their speech, so maybe "the reality" is just an exaggerated amount of processes? Also, if you heard of Silvia Platt, she wrote diaries, and some novels, and poems, in which she put many efforts to make her works be as perfect as possible. She also was a big fan of Freud... Well, let me explain her behaviour in my way. I think that her (as well as some or even all writers) manners were to wake our imagination up, and to make us draw images within our souls or somewhere (where we apply our imagination activities). Just in my case, I am not a good writer, nor a good English user, that's why my messages are weak and plain. Doubtfully my comments enable someone's imagination with lots of flames. Time to time even an ordinary person use certain words to torch "the fire within us", while daily our speech is dressed in dramatically colourless clothes. If we call those different shades 'styles' we may say that some styles are able to make us writers if we would use them correctly and with talents. Okay, briefly saying, I guess that "the reality" in its most edge view for us is some sort of mixture of our imagination and the traces of the outer things multiplied by specifically painted words which functions is to make us use the imagination. And, besides, exactly that reason why we use this or that type of imagination (and how words can govern us) is the result of reflections previously taught by us. So, psychology can be viewed as a science that studies how we govern words and imaginations, and why we tie up certain symbols with certain reactions. Literature in general involves deviation from the normal. The conflict starts when an opposing force blocks the normal passage of events so that things change dirctions and go up until they reach the climax and then go down to the resolution. Exaggeration is also a kind of deviation from what is held as normal in order to create an emotional effect in the reader. Simile is to say for example that John's eyes are like his brother's but in literature a simile involves comparing two things that are apparently different so to overwhelm the reader like when they say her eyes are like a grove of palm trees leaving the reader to comtemplate this exaggerated picture and come up with his/her own meaning. Realism does not mean using ordinary expressions but it means reflecting reality faithfully. Picasso made a painting of Guernica the city which was destroyed by Hitler in which Guernica appears as a place of ruins and scattered human body parts. When one of Hitler's men asked him how he, a famous painter would make such an ugly painting. Picasso said to him you painted it not me. He means to say that the ugly picture is painted by the one who creates the ugly reality not the artist who honestly mimics it. Sylvia Plath suffered from psychological issues and she finally ended her own life. I read her poem Daddy in which she says that her father has pressed her inside his shoe and now she has rotten inside it. She needs to get out of her father's shoe. I also read her poem the Mirror in which she describes how a mirror has been friendly with a girl since she was a child until old age receiving her patiently in all her moods and reflecting her honestly and without any bias.
|
|
|
Presence
Oct 16, 2023 17:55:20 GMT
via mobile
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 16, 2023 17:55:20 GMT
May I ask you, please, what do you think about a human's exaggeration of things about realities? I mean not rarely people use mataphors, epithets, modifiers, or amplifiers for their speech, so maybe "the reality" is just an exaggerated amount of processes? Also, if you heard of Silvia Platt, she wrote diaries, and some novels, and poems, in which she put many efforts to make her works be as perfect as possible. She also was a big fan of Freud... Well, let me explain her behaviour in my way. I think that her (as well as some or even all writers) manners were to wake our imagination up, and to make us draw images within our souls or somewhere (where we apply our imagination activities). Just in my case, I am not a good writer, nor a good English user, that's why my messages are weak and plain. Doubtfully my comments enable someone's imagination with lots of flames. Time to time even an ordinary person use certain words to torch "the fire within us", while daily our speech is dressed in dramatically colourless clothes. If we call those different shades 'styles' we may say that some styles are able to make us writers if we would use them correctly and with talents. Okay, briefly saying, I guess that "the reality" in its most edge view for us is some sort of mixture of our imagination and the traces of the outer things multiplied by specifically painted words which functions is to make us use the imagination. And, besides, exactly that reason why we use this or that type of imagination (and how words can govern us) is the result of reflections previously taught by us. So, psychology can be viewed as a science that studies how we govern words and imaginations, and why we tie up certain symbols with certain reactions. Literature in general involves deviation from the normal. The conflict starts when an opposing force blocks the normal passage of events so that things change dirctions and go up until they reach the climax and then go down to the resolution. Exaggeration is also a kind of deviation from what is held as normal in order to create an emotional effect in the reader. Simile is to say for example that John's eyes are like his brother's but in literature a simile involves comparing two things that are apparently different so to overwhelm the reader like when they say her eyes are like a grove of palm trees leaving the reader to comtemplate this exaggerated picture and come up with his/her own meaning. Realism does not mean using ordinary expressions but it means reflecting reality faithfully. Picasso made a painting of Guernica the city which was destroyed by Hitler in which Guernica appears as a place of ruins and scattered human body parts. When one of Hitler's men asked him how he, a famous painter would make such an ugly painting. Picasso said to him you painted it not me. He means to say that the ugly picture is painted by the one who creates the ugly reality not the artist who honestly mimics it. Sylvia Plath suffered from psychological issues and she finally ended her own life. I read her poem Daddy in which she says that her father has pressed her inside his shoe and now she has rotten inside it. She needs to get out of her father's shoe. I also read her poem the Mirror in which she describes how a mirror has been friendly with a girl since she was a child until old age receiving her patiently in all her moods and reflecting her honestly and without any bias. Picasso was right, however it must have been also added that his maneuver gone quite far. Why so? Let's imagine I am a gold keeper who lives on an island; bunch of pirates attack the island, and asked me 'Where's gold?' I answer, on the Earth, the third planet from the Sun. Technically I was correct, but such answers could cost me a life. Anyway, many tricks might have been used by different writers in different historical periods. For instance, today is popular to trust completely to the talents of publishing companies to get as possible profit from publishing a book as those book-producers are able to make. Writers as Sylvia Plath are different stories. I know it doesn't seem to be a certainly well argument, but her writings are most trustworthy, since she tried to be sincere. On the other hand, knowing how some women like to use their art of foxy artistry, and makeup techniques as well, I can't be sure I'm always ready to trust to a woman's tears. Theatres, circuses, cinemas, etc also offer not just an entertainment solely, but a kind of reality, where we can feel some presence of certain things, or people. For instance, historical novels are to let us perceive some specific events, to take a part in them, etc. While virtual reality, or 3D cinemas do it in their straight manner, books or music do it in their metaphorical way.
|
|