|
Presence
May 16, 2023 15:17:39 GMT
via mobile
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 16, 2023 15:17:39 GMT
Is it just an effect? Or this is something more, than just a feeling? Can we perceive or to feel the reality, the world around us more closer? It might be that all the time we've been living the life never even think about the presence in it. So, let's say we felt something that was closer to the presence, was it en effect, or some kind of another psychological trick, or this was more, than that?
What is also notable is that a person doesn't require to have devices or some other tools to do this, it's able to star doing it wherever you are. The problem is – how to do it, and how true is it. And the most dramatically here is that logical thinking here seems not a good friend – it's something inside, something very intimate.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jul 14, 2023 20:36:51 GMT
So if all the smaller facts are hidden, and the great facts are composed of these small facts we don't know, then the great facts have foundations we cannot see thus leaving the foundations of history on obscurity. Yeah can all the great facts be fully trusted? I hear people say that when a person makes up a fake story it will still have something of truth it in but overall will be false. With that being said there's the story of Titanic. I heard another verson of it that the Titanic was made on an old ship that was just remade and renamed. However, in that same story I also read that like a crew member who was on that old ship came to set foot in the new ship and was certain it was the same ship he travelled on before just remade to look differently to fool people. The old ship also had flaws so he noticed those flaws too and that they were not fully fixed. So yeah is the Titanic story we currently read truly correct? History is an interpretation and interpretations change.
|
|
rexa
Junior Member
Posts: 78
Likes: 16
|
Post by rexa on Jul 27, 2023 20:40:45 GMT
Is it just an effect? Or this is something more, than just a feeling? Can we perceive or to feel the reality, the world around us more closer? It might be that all the time we've been living the life never even think about the presence in it. So, let's say we felt something that was closer to the presence, was it en effect, or some kind of another psychological trick, or this was more, than that? What is also notable is that a person doesn't require to have devices or some other tools to do this, it's able to star doing it wherever you are. The problem is – how to do it, and how true is it. And the most dramatically here is that logical thinking here seems not a good friend – it's something inside, something very intimate. So, let's say we felt something that was closer to the presence, was it en effect, or some kind of another psychological trick, or this was more, than that? Ask yourself this if you ever get an orgasm in a sexxxual conduct. You would have your answer
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 29, 2023 12:02:00 GMT
Is it just an effect? Or this is something more, than just a feeling? Can we perceive or to feel the reality, the world around us more closer? It might be that all the time we've been living the life never even think about the presence in it. So, let's say we felt something that was closer to the presence, was it en effect, or some kind of another psychological trick, or this was more, than that? What is also notable is that a person doesn't require to have devices or some other tools to do this, it's able to star doing it wherever you are. The problem is – how to do it, and how true is it. And the most dramatically here is that logical thinking here seems not a good friend – it's something inside, something very intimate. So, let's say we felt something that was closer to the presence, was it en effect, or some kind of another psychological trick, or this was more, than that? Ask yourself this if you ever get an orgasm in a sexxxual conduct. You would have your answer You're not a troll. Too softy. Why don't you join fb, twitter, or kinda forums? Or you've been banned there too? Is there anything esle except for psychology you can tell? Put psychology into argument is the last resort. What about Parmenides reading? Have you read Nietzsche or Kant?
|
|
rexa
Junior Member
Posts: 78
Likes: 16
|
Post by rexa on Jul 29, 2023 17:14:16 GMT
So, let's say we felt something that was closer to the presence, was it en effect, or some kind of another psychological trick, or this was more, than that? Ask yourself this if you ever get an orgasm in a sexxxual conduct. You would have your answer You're not a troll. Too softy. Why don't you join fb, twitter, or kinda forums? Or you've been banned there too? Is there anything esle except for psychology you can tell? Put psychology into argument is the last resort. What about Parmenides reading? Have you read Nietzsche or Kant? Kant was my next door neighbour. His work on Morality freedom and reason are my favourite. His principle categorical imperative is something I adore. I don't feel the need to post such stuff here. Mainly because such intellect is not exhibited here anymore. The Lunatic X to the power 9 has taken over the Philosophy forum and posts absolutely ridiculous stuff. Moreover like I said in the shoutbox. Your response are an utter challenge and irritating to read. So I avoid posting anything intellect just to save myself from your replies
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 2, 2023 11:29:20 GMT
You're not a troll. Too softy. Why don't you join fb, twitter, or kinda forums? Or you've been banned there too? Is there anything esle except for psychology you can tell? Put psychology into argument is the last resort. What about Parmenides reading? Have you read Nietzsche or Kant? Kant was my next door neighbour. His work on Morality freedom and reason are my favourite. His principle categorical imperative is something I adore. I don't feel the need to post such stuff here. Mainly because such intellect is not exhibited here anymore. The Lunatic X to the power 9 has taken over the Philosophy forum and posts absolutely ridiculous stuff. Moreover like I said in the shoutbox. Your response are an utter challenge and irritating to read. So I avoid posting anything intellect just to save myself from your replies Really? So you should know that since you're insulting the other member - the one to whom you're referring to at the moment - it allows anyone to do the same under the similar situation. And this won't be good. Yeah, a straw man suits you so well. But you know there's the rotten smell, the smell of that former member of this forum is somewhere nearby. One loony one whose behaviour was exactly contra-Kantian, while he loved Kant also.
|
|
rexa
Junior Member
Posts: 78
Likes: 16
|
Post by rexa on Aug 2, 2023 21:54:07 GMT
Kant was my next door neighbour. His work on Morality freedom and reason are my favourite. His principle categorical imperative is something I adore. I don't feel the need to post such stuff here. Mainly because such intellect is not exhibited here anymore. The Lunatic X to the power 9 has taken over the Philosophy forum and posts absolutely ridiculous stuff. Moreover like I said in the shoutbox. Your response are an utter challenge and irritating to read. So I avoid posting anything intellect just to save myself from your replies Really? So you should know that since you're insulting the other member - the one to whom you're referring to at the moment - it allows anyone to do the same under the similar situation. And this won't be good. Yeah, a straw man suits you so well. But you know there's the rotten smell, the smell of that former member of this forum is somewhere nearby. One loony one whose behaviour was exactly contra-Kantian, while he loved Kant also. Dude I didn't insult anyone on this post. I simply replied on your thread. The orgasm really fits in that description. I don't know why are you getting so worked up. Just because I don't agree with you on Ukraine war. Since that day you have been reacting like a child. Instead of replying in a coherent manner. The other members are mature enough not to bite my bait and ignore me instead of going head on with the troll master. But you choose to get invloved when I am not even refering you. Your reactive behaviour and name calling only shows you are still a kid. Grow up. Lastly if you think calling someone lunatic is an insult. You are not going justice to this forum by name calling me. Infact you are running your mouth as if you need a really good soap wash. Learn the art of moderating.
|
|
|
Presence
Aug 3, 2023 5:59:57 GMT
via mobile
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 3, 2023 5:59:57 GMT
Really? So you should know that since you're insulting the other member - the one to whom you're referring to at the moment - it allows anyone to do the same under the similar situation. And this won't be good. Yeah, a straw man suits you so well. But you know there's the rotten smell, the smell of that former member of this forum is somewhere nearby. One loony one whose behaviour was exactly contra-Kantian, while he loved Kant also. Dude I didn't insult anyone on this post. I simply replied on your thread. The orgasm really fits in that description. I don't know why are you getting so worked up. Just because I don't agree with you on Ukraine war. Since that day you have been reacting like a child. Instead of replying in a coherent manner. The other members are mature enough not to bite my bait and ignore me instead of going head on with the troll master. But you choose to get invloved when I am not even refering you. Your reactive behaviour and name calling only shows you are still a kid. Grow up. Lastly if you think calling someone lunatic is an insult. You are not going justice to this forum by name calling me. Infact you are running your mouth as if you need a really good soap wash. Learn the art of moderating. There are some who doesn't agree. That's not a reason. If you got eyes, you wouldn't see any reactions you imagined in your head. There was another member, and I suspect it is you, who acted similarly and was banned. "Troll"-heads or whatever Napoleons of all the kinds aren't needed here, we're wasted of those ones. So, no other troll acting will be accepted more. That's a warn.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 12, 2023 4:26:06 GMT
Yeah can all the great facts be fully trusted? I hear people say that when a person makes up a fake story it will still have something of truth it in but overall will be false. With that being said there's the story of Titanic. I heard another verson of it that the Titanic was made on an old ship that was just remade and renamed. However, in that same story I also read that like a crew member who was on that old ship came to set foot in the new ship and was certain it was the same ship he travelled on before just remade to look differently to fool people. The old ship also had flaws so he noticed those flaws too and that they were not fully fixed. So yeah is the Titanic story we currently read truly correct? History is an interpretation and interpretations change. Yes! But how factual does that make history then?
|
|
|
Presence
Aug 14, 2023 20:54:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by MAYA-EL on Aug 14, 2023 20:54:18 GMT
Everyone has and leaves behind a certain presence in this world. The more a person involves themselves in the world the bigger presence they leave behind. The ones that just live and pass on by like the wind as in here one day and gone the next just basically dwelt in the moment. Others actually lived in the moment. They took their presence here and obsorbed the world. They thought about things a lot like philosophy. And each leaves behind either a good or bad presence based on their actions of how they "dwelt" or "lived" in the world. If it is a thing it passes. Presence is a thing. This realm is a thing
|
|
|
Presence
Aug 14, 2023 21:01:06 GMT
via mobile
Post by MAYA-EL on Aug 14, 2023 21:01:06 GMT
You're not a troll. Too softy. Why don't you join fb, twitter, or kinda forums? Or you've been banned there too? Is there anything esle except for psychology you can tell? Put psychology into argument is the last resort. What about Parmenides reading? Have you read Nietzsche or Kant? Kant was my next door neighbour. His work on Morality freedom and reason are my favourite. His principle categorical imperative is something I adore. I don't feel the need to post such stuff here. Mainly because such intellect is not exhibited here anymore. The Lunatic X to the power 9 has taken over the Philosophy forum and posts absolutely ridiculous stuff. Moreover like I said in the shoutbox. Your response are an utter challenge and irritating to read. So I avoid posting anything intellect just to save myself from your replies I thought this forum was made for xxxxxxxxx or perhaps the new style is to post 15 new topics a day that could easily be condensed into one normal post . im glad im not the only one that noticed the offical forum post wh0re lolz
|
|
|
Presence
Aug 14, 2023 21:03:20 GMT
via mobile
Post by MAYA-EL on Aug 14, 2023 21:03:20 GMT
Really? So you should know that since you're insulting the other member - the one to whom you're referring to at the moment - it allows anyone to do the same under the similar situation. And this won't be good. Yeah, a straw man suits you so well. But you know there's the rotten smell, the smell of that former member of this forum is somewhere nearby. One loony one whose behaviour was exactly contra-Kantian, while he loved Kant also. Dude I didn't insult anyone on this post. I simply replied on your thread. The orgasm really fits in that description. I don't know why are you getting so worked up. Just because I don't agree with you on Ukraine war. Since that day you have been reacting like a child. Instead of replying in a coherent manner. The other members are mature enough not to bite my bait and ignore me instead of going head on with the troll master. But you choose to get invloved when I am not even refering you. Your reactive behaviour and name calling only shows you are still a kid. Grow up. Lastly if you think calling someone lunatic is an insult. You are not going justice to this forum by name calling me. Infact you are running your mouth as if you need a really good soap wash. Learn the art of moderating. Wait a minute is this Gladys?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 18, 2023 20:14:58 GMT
History is an interpretation and interpretations change. Yes! But how factual does that make history then? Does it matter if the interpretation guides our behavior regardless of its truth?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 18, 2023 20:15:55 GMT
If it is a thing it passes. Presence is a thing. This realm is a thing And change is the evidence of its passing.
|
|
|
Presence
Aug 18, 2023 23:45:21 GMT
via mobile
Post by MAYA-EL on Aug 18, 2023 23:45:21 GMT
And change is the evidence of its passing. Change is something that everything is subject to but that does not mean that things past the individual portion of a thing has biodegraded and passed but not all of the things because everything is in a cyclical birth and death process now had you originally said everything that exists has changed that would have been correct but you didn't you said everything that exists passes and passes although similar to change is not exactly the same meaning and they're used differently although sometimes interchangeably and I believe you originally used the proper word to express your opinion but then I pound stamped you boom with one example that totally kicked your little tasty paste artwork project in the mud before the teachers could see it and that hurt so now you're changing the definition of what you said to try to desperately keep from having your statement curb stomped in less than 10 minutes of it being posted like I so did. It's okay not everybody has the Integrity to eat it when they're wrong I'll just hope that one day you'll acknowledge how wrong you are.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 1, 2023 19:14:58 GMT
And change is the evidence of its passing. Change is something that everything is subject to but that does not mean that things past the individual portion of a thing has biodegraded and passed but not all of the things because everything is in a cyclical birth and death process now had you originally said everything that exists has changed that would have been correct but you didn't you said everything that exists passes and passes although similar to change is not exactly the same meaning and they're used differently although sometimes interchangeably and I believe you originally used the proper word to express your opinion but then I pound stamped you boom with one example that totally kicked your little tasty paste artwork project in the mud before the teachers could see it and that hurt so now you're changing the definition of what you said to try to desperately keep from having your statement curb stomped in less than 10 minutes of it being posted like I so did. It's okay not everybody has the Integrity to eat it when they're wrong I'll just hope that one day you'll acknowledge how wrong you are. The fact that everything is cyclical necessitates change as one thing repeating results in a new time and space of said thing repeating...this is change.
|
|