|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Apr 29, 2023 6:28:39 GMT
If x lasts or keeps being itself (being x) we say that x is identical to x. Or in other words, if x is identical to x, then all what x is x is.
What about contradictions? If we want to be certain that x and non-x (it's opposite) cannot co-exist, we must add that it depends on under which respect we aim it. There's an addition to this law that only for each respect x cannot co-exist with non-x. To reformulate it will be: if R is a respect, then for each R x and non-x are not the same. In other words, no way to remove outer reasons from x and non-x.
Another story is the law of identity. In it x can rely on itself solely, without any additional relations. In the law of contradiction there are outer reasons or respects; there are no any for the law of identity. But as soon as logic is what relies only upon itself, the law of contradictions is fuzzy, and vaguely logical.
|
|