gabble
New Member
Posts: 24
Likes: 3
|
Post by gabble on Apr 28, 2023 20:59:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Apr 28, 2023 21:51:59 GMT
If anything can be uttered via texts it doesn't mean that anything is meaningless, or else anyone writes text only having no meaning or purposes which isn't true, since your text is pretending to have some sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Apr 29, 2023 8:30:31 GMT
Thats a bit much to expect people to read as an introduction.
But university courses are typically only 20% practical.
So yeah, most of what passes for 'science' is not really science,
but mere wordy-words to be rehearsed.
Like this:
Nothing escapes the black-hole even if it moves at light-speed.
2017 Nobel prize for 'detecting' gravity coming from 'black holes'
and said to be moving at light-speed.
And hundreds more textual pseudo-science, typically rubber-stamped:
"peer reviewed".
(Just a hint that its another ponzischeme)
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Apr 29, 2023 11:50:42 GMT
Thats a bit much to expect people to read as an introduction. But university courses are typically only 20% practical. So yeah, most of what passes for 'science' is not really science, but mere wordy-words to be rehearsed. Like this: Nothing escapes the black-hole even if it moves at light-speed. 2017 Nobel prize for 'detecting' gravity coming from 'black holes' and said to be moving at light-speed. And hundreds more textual pseudo-science, typically rubber-stamped: "peer reviewed". (Just a hint that its another ponzischeme) Academic science is anti-sciece or even anti-human. Actually, the academics are mostly the ones who make us see that their work is almost paper-only with no sense in that. A bubble gum for finance systems. |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on May 1, 2023 17:42:11 GMT
Thats a bit much to expect people to read as an introduction. But university courses are typically only 20% practical. So yeah, most of what passes for 'science' is not really science, but mere wordy-words to be rehearsed. Like this: Nothing escapes the black-hole even if it moves at light-speed. 2017 Nobel prize for 'detecting' gravity coming from 'black holes' and said to be moving at light-speed. And hundreds more textual pseudo-science, typically rubber-stamped: "peer reviewed". (Just a hint that its another ponzischeme) I can't get over the fact that they say "nothing can escape black hole" then the say "black hole detected"  wtf come on science at least try to not to contradict yourself so bad but I don't know what's worse the fact that science contradicts itself like that for the fact that it's followers don't even notice? |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on May 2, 2023 8:54:48 GMT
Thats a bit much to expect people to read as an introduction. But university courses are typically only 20% practical. So yeah, most of what passes for 'science' is not really science, but mere wordy-words to be rehearsed. Like this: Nothing escapes the black-hole even if it moves at light-speed. 2017 Nobel prize for 'detecting' gravity coming from 'black holes' and said to be moving at light-speed. And hundreds more textual pseudo-science, typically rubber-stamped: "peer reviewed". (Just a hint that its another ponzischeme) I can't get over the fact that they say "nothing can escape black hole" then the say "black hole detected" wtf come on science at least try to not to contradict yourself so bad but I don't know what's worse the fact that science contradicts itself like that for the fact that it's followers don't even notice?
True. Anyone can be mislead or make an error, but when they refuse to admit the error at all, and would rather live in pretense...
Well, these people do more harm to their offspring than anyone else, because when the lie does
come crashing to the ground publicly...
they make their entire family a mockery. All they embezzled becomes a legitimate target. And anyone even associated with them.
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
Posts: 227
Likes: 80
|
Post by lamburk on May 3, 2023 8:49:45 GMT
Thats a bit much to expect people to read as an introduction. But university courses are typically only 20% practical. So yeah, most of what passes for 'science' is not really science, but mere wordy-words to be rehearsed. Like this: Nothing escapes the black-hole even if it moves at light-speed. 2017 Nobel prize for 'detecting' gravity coming from 'black holes' and said to be moving at light-speed. And hundreds more textual pseudo-science, typically rubber-stamped: "peer reviewed". (Just a hint that its another ponzischeme) Academic science is anti-sciece or even anti-human. Actually, the academics are mostly the ones who make us see that their work is almost paper-only with no sense in that. A bubble gum for finance systems. Academics are the ones, who makes us to lose interest in subjects, because, they teach that in a very regimented manner. It's completely pedestrian, boring, and monotonous. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 4, 2023 13:18:19 GMT
Academic science is anti-sciece or even anti-human. Actually, the academics are mostly the ones who make us see that their work is almost paper-only with no sense in that. A bubble gum for finance systems. Academics are the ones, who makes us to lose interest in subjects, because, they teach that in a very regimented manner. It's completely pedestrian, boring, and monotonous. I absolutely agree with you. Only what I wanted to add that the reasons of their exhaust behaviour and other isn't the only their problem. May I ask you, please, what you would reccomend for anyone to add something interesting? Or what you see as interesting? |
|
lamburk
Full Member
Posts: 227
Likes: 80
|
Post by lamburk on May 4, 2023 16:34:14 GMT
Academics are the ones, who makes us to lose interest in subjects, because, they teach that in a very regimented manner. It's completely pedestrian, boring, and monotonous. I absolutely agree with you. Only what I wanted to add that the reasons of their exhaust behaviour and other isn't the only their problem. May I ask you, please, what you would reccomend for anyone to add something interesting? Or what you see as interesting? What I find interesting is self learning on our own, then, trying to apply it, after that, discuss it with people, who has interest in the topic. However, it's tough to find such a group. Besides, in academic, everyone is a competitor, not friends. |
|
|
|
Post by joustos on May 4, 2023 18:43:54 GMT
all who claim that science is mythology are careless speakers: , you mean, --- is myth-making [not the study of myths], AND are false speakers, since myth-making is neither experimental nor mathematical. etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 4, 2023 20:07:12 GMT
I absolutely agree with you. Only what I wanted to add that the reasons of their exhaust behaviour and other isn't the only their problem. May I ask you, please, what you would reccomend for anyone to add something interesting? Or what you see as interesting? What I find interesting is self learning on our own, then, trying to apply it, after that, discuss it with people, who has interest in the topic. However, it's tough to find such a group. Besides, in academic, everyone is a competitor, not friends. Very true. Sometimes people want just to have a talk, or discuss not as competitors or to provide some debates, but to be people. I find the theme about what is interesting to be quite similar with love, or most precisely with the feeling of fell in love. When a person falls in love the one finds some interest in someone else. I wonder do this happen all the time when we're interested in something? By the way, there are kinds of love. Let's say for ancient Greeks there were four or six types of love. There were love to friends, and love between lovers. I guess it might be the same that there might be sorts of interests also. Well, I'm not sure about it. |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on May 5, 2023 0:53:16 GMT
I absolutely agree with you. Only what I wanted to add that the reasons of their exhaust behaviour and other isn't the only their problem. May I ask you, please, what you would reccomend for anyone to add something interesting? Or what you see as interesting? What I find interesting is self learning on our own, then, trying to apply it, after that, discuss it with people, who has interest in the topic. However, it's tough to find such a group. Besides, in academic, everyone is a competitor, not friends. That's the only way I know how to learn. It's ironic anytime I've gone for a certification or any type of extra school work of any form I tend to be the guy helping everybody with their homework yet when it comes time to take the test it's like foreign Chinese arithmetic to me I'm so unused to the format used in testing that I usually score really low despite helping the people that scored almost a perfect score and they always look at me confused but I tell him I'm just unfamiliar with hell mainstream learning is done I've always been self taught. |
|
wtf come on science at least try to not to contradict yourself so bad but I don't know what's worse the fact that science contradicts itself like that for the fact that it's followers don't even notice?