Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on Apr 26, 2023 13:45:35 GMT
The more and more I try to find a profound meaning for "being", the more I laught.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Apr 26, 2023 14:47:20 GMT
Let's say that if an object exists it can exist for itself, or for some other object. If it exists only for itself, then this object is immanent to itself, it is reachable for itself, and, therefore, this object can find itself as a being - because it has an access to itself as itself. Otherwise, an object can interact with itself only via the other objects, but this time its own being is transcendental. However, for that object any interactions can be viewed as parts of itself, hence - the parts of that primary object, and it's possible to for the object to accept its being-ness via the mediator interaction.
So, in general, if 'A exists' or 'that parciticapating to being A' is a self-registration or confirmation, etc that an interactor of an action is directing the action upon himself /itself/ to find himself /inself/ in that act.
|
|