|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 31, 2023 17:52:31 GMT
If there is only one thing, i.e. a monism, then all illusions are part of this reality thus are no longer illusions. But then there is an illusion that there are illusions. Under these terms reality is a contradiction and as a contradiction is beyond the senses. We cannot say what reality is or is not without ending in contradiction. And yet this prior statement is a statement about reality thus it contradicts itself. This contradiction exists. In reality there is only everything then. And this everything includes all things and conscious experiences as things. In summary my self-refuting argument is a pointer to how little we know of reality as the expanse of things exists beyond individual comprehension.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Apr 28, 2023 11:45:57 GMT
MAYA-ELIts fairly proven that about 12k years ago major asteroid impacts in greenland and southern indian oceans wiped out human civilizations this is atlantis, giglamesh, and noah but if you look at the devastation which is the surface of the moon with its very weak gravity, you don't need much more than normal asteroids to do this. 12000 years is a very wide window of opportunity that window closes all the time
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 28, 2023 18:21:26 GMT
Relation is not necessarily subject to sentient entities but what are commonly see as non-sentient (although I do not agree with this statement as I argue all is sentient). For example a rock is relative to dirt as it is composed of dirt. A leaf is relative to a tree as it is connected to a tree. Things are relative in the respect they have a connection to one thing or another.
But that word hurts my ears and my soul. And so long as that word persists in its being, humanity is doomed to be destroyed by a bloody big meteor, because the math that it implies will destroy what little remains of the academic institutions.
It must be destroyed as the worst sacrilege, beyond the most horrible confines, even of beezlebub itself !
Then Ragnarok devour you all for your ignorance as to what is real, and what is not real.
Most specifically regards the math of gravity. Nothing is more pertinent to the survival of the entire ecosystem.
1. It hurts your preconceived view of reality because it contradicts it and yet it, i.e. the contradiction and opposing view point, is a part of reality. 2. A thing connected to another thing necessitates comparison, paradoxically, as the implication that there is a connection necessitates that the things connected may be viewed as individual parts. As individual parts these things may also stand apart from each other thus gaining an individual identity. For example: A leaf is connected to a tree. This connection necessitates that there is a leaf and there is a tree. Given that there is a leaf and a tree it may be observed that while connected the leaf and tree may each be viewed as individual entities which stand apart from eachother. We end in absurdity as connection and separation occur simultaneously. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 28, 2023 18:36:15 GMT
If everything is obliterated at the highest levels of reality then we are left with no-thing. You agreed with the other poster but disagree with me and yet both the other poster and I are saying the same thing. If everything was obliterated there'd be just a lot of obliterated stuff Then the remaining stuff is not obliterated thus not all is obliterated. Take for example a house exploding. It is obliterated. But brick and planks of board remain and these are not obliterated. If "everything is obliterated" then even the bricks and planks of wood cease to exist. But this leaves us with the atoms which are not obliterated...but if "everything is obliterated" even the atoms are obliterated...thus leaving us with no-thing, i.e. just empty space and empty space is not a thing. |
|
