|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 12, 2022 21:55:43 GMT
Ok, Boomer
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP
Elder
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Oct 17, 2022 4:42:38 GMT
You know this is rather fascinating to me. Did Ukraine have a true baby boomer generation? The baby boomers in America are called such because after WW2 our soldiers went home to their wives and reproduced in great numbers and raised those kids in the American Golden Age of the 1950s. Then they grew up and rebelled against their parent's morality founding a counter culture of moral degeneracy filled with drugs, promiscuous sex, and liberal attitudes that have basically metastasized into the woke clown show we have today(baby boomers run our government and institutions.) The baby boomers in my country left a disastrous legacy for my generation.
Ukraine however, was under the Soviet Union at the time. A totalitarian, genocidal, atheistic, communist empire. I have to wonder how this state of affairs would affect your boomer equivalents. I'm sure the values they espouse would be very different from our boomers. Were the people in the Soviet Union as fecund upon returning from WW2 as we were and what kind of values did that generation espouse?
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 18, 2022 10:04:57 GMT
You know this is rather fascinating to me. Did Ukraine have a true baby boomer generation? The baby boomers in America are called such because after WW2 our soldiers went home to their wives and reproduced in great numbers and raised those kids in the American Golden Age of the 1950s. Then they grew up and rebelled against their parent's morality founding a counter culture of moral degeneracy filled with drugs, promiscuous sex, and liberal attitudes that have basically metastasized into the woke clown show we have today(baby boomers run our government and institutions.) The baby boomers in my country left a disastrous legacy for my generation. Ukraine however, was under the Soviet Union at the time. A totalitarian, genocidal, atheistic, communist empire. I have to wonder how this state of affairs would affect your boomer equivalents. I'm sure the values they espouse would be very different from our boomers. Were the people in the Soviet Union as fecund upon returning from WW2 as we were and what kind of values did that generation espouse? Thank you for your question. It made me did a surface research about how "the boomers" is circulating here, among some people. So, according to few Ukrainian online resources the youth use this word to mark the elder people. No, I'd say there are no strictly comparison between the boomers in US and Ukraine, Russia, or others local countries, because - as you truly underlined - of USSR's regime politics. However, it seems that the local after-war generation put mostly negative effort into many processes. It wouldn't be 100% correct to compare, but the Curt Cobain's generation I prefer more to "the boomers" as well as the pre-boomers generation to the boomers. Needless to say that Putin can be compared to the boomers. I like how that phrase 'ok, boomer' sounds. I don't know why, but some teenagers vocabulary doesn't seem so ugly to me. There are people who are disappointed in the youth. I know s*it happens elsewhere, but I want to believe the next generations won't be screwed. I do hope it'll be so. There's such a phenomenon as the ageism. Some socialogists say this phaenomenon hasn't been properly researched, and to not let the generations turn their relationships into war - is important. My opinion is that this may help to save or to keep the family concept to be fair and true. Maybe I'm not complete traditionalist, but I like many of those traditional things. Most of the brightest and decent periods in history were presented by dinasties or good families.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Oct 19, 2022 8:41:51 GMT
You know this is rather fascinating to me. Did Ukraine have a true baby boomer generation? The baby boomers in America are called such because after WW2 our soldiers went home to their wives and reproduced in great numbers and raised those kids in the American Golden Age of the 1950s. Then they grew up and rebelled against their parent's morality founding a counter culture of moral degeneracy filled with drugs, promiscuous sex, and liberal attitudes that have basically metastasized into the woke clown show we have today(baby boomers run our government and institutions.) The baby boomers in my country left a disastrous legacy for my generation. Ukraine however, was under the Soviet Union at the time. A totalitarian, genocidal, atheistic, communist empire. I have to wonder how this state of affairs would affect your boomer equivalents. I'm sure the values they espouse would be very different from our boomers. Were the people in the Soviet Union as fecund upon returning from WW2 as we were and what kind of values did that generation espouse?
The Boomer generation inherited a golden opportunity as the heirs of the victories of ww2, which were won through genuine christian principles, barely.
They then proceeded, to over-populate, like previous victors had, but not quite as bad as previous generations.
The big error comes in the divide between the faux dichotomy of the liberal-conservative paradigm.
This atheist construct divides true christian values by diluting them with different aspects of autocracy
into this watered-down polarity ... which seeks to reduce human behavior to either left or right wing,
rather than authentic christian, versus nihilist atheism. Which is the real ontology of ethic.
Jesus never said "drugs are bad m'kay". Its the pharmaceutical materialists who want you to buy WHITE owned drugs rather than black-owned natural and historical remedies which are now 'tarnished' by the fascist media. And are for the most part, superior medicine.
And thus we have people perpetuating satans racist persecution under the guise of 'christianity'. Like He warned they would.
|
|