|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jan 30, 2022 22:53:28 GMT
What metaphysics is? - Is not what considered to be true, but something that accumulated it somewhere at peripheria.
If we investigate something we discover it, and if it is beyond logic of the physical reality, automatically it doesn't seem as being accepted as the reality. Instead, the narrative or the logic behind metaphysics represents the teller of it. In other words, by metaphysics we don't investigate the outer world, by it the inner world of oneself is being investigated.
Today almost no one tells about the self, or ego, or a person. Everyone is captured by the global things. But the globals are not interesting ones. Who cares about those manufactured names? There are no states, there are people who have decided that there and there is a state. There are no atoms, but the scientists have decided there are atoms, and so on. Without an agreement of the majority few ones don't believe the rest. Sad to hear it, but it's true. And this is another reason to investigate oneself, instead of going nowhere and being lost.
|
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Feb 1, 2022 10:38:00 GMT
I agree
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Feb 2, 2022 21:56:47 GMT
What metaphysics is? - Is not what considered to be true, but something that accumulated it somewhere at peripheria. If we investigate something we discover it, and if it is beyond logic of the physical reality, automatically it doesn't seem as being accepted as the reality. Instead, the narrative or the logic behind metaphysics represents the teller of it. In other words, by metaphysics we don't investigate the outer world, by it the inner world of oneself is being investigated. Today almost no one tells about the self, or ego, or a person. Everyone is captured by the global things. But the globals are not interesting ones. Who cares about those manufactured names? There are no states, there are people who have decided that there and there is a state. There are no atoms, but the scientists have decided there are atoms, and so on. Without an agreement of the majority few ones don't believe the rest. Sad to hear it, but it's true. And this is another reason to investigate oneself, instead of going nowhere and being lost. We are extensions of the contexts from which we come thus in knowing the inner we know the outer and vice versa. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 2, 2022 22:21:28 GMT
What metaphysics is? - Is not what considered to be true, but something that accumulated it somewhere at peripheria. If we investigate something we discover it, and if it is beyond logic of the physical reality, automatically it doesn't seem as being accepted as the reality. Instead, the narrative or the logic behind metaphysics represents the teller of it. In other words, by metaphysics we don't investigate the outer world, by it the inner world of oneself is being investigated. Today almost no one tells about the self, or ego, or a person. Everyone is captured by the global things. But the globals are not interesting ones. Who cares about those manufactured names? There are no states, there are people who have decided that there and there is a state. There are no atoms, but the scientists have decided there are atoms, and so on. Without an agreement of the majority few ones don't believe the rest. Sad to hear it, but it's true. And this is another reason to investigate oneself, instead of going nowhere and being lost. We are extensions of the contexts from which we come thus in knowing the inner we know the outer and vice versa. Logically you don't bring anything: A is the same as the addition to non-A. Of course if you're studying how can you study yourself - is just an interpetation of this process of the self-studying. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Feb 2, 2022 23:14:58 GMT
We are extensions of the contexts from which we come thus in knowing the inner we know the outer and vice versa. Logically you don't bring anything: A is the same as the addition to non-A. Of course if you're studying how can you study yourself - is just an interpetation of this process of the self-studying. If we are defined from the contexts from which we come we equate to these contexts. "Inner" and "Outer" are relative terms pointing to the same thing much in the same manner a "left" is a "relative right" and a "right" is a "relative left". |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Feb 4, 2022 16:01:07 GMT
So much of our language is embedded in the idea of the fundamental
difference between self and world ; its like a knife that
slices the umbilical chord of the idea of a wholistic universe.
But when you do make such a move precisely ; then this is what
gives the mind what it needs to see the difference between real
physics and sophistry.
The intuition that led Newton to ponder the apple is itself
inexplicable in terms of physics.
Apples had been falling since the time of Eve...
Its ironic that by only by defining clearly the difference between
science and fantasy that we can see science for what it is,
and are not duped by "science".
Those who repress the creative and fantastical side of the mind
then so easily contrive their false fantastical thoughts with science
and mindlessly follow the illusions of the snake-oil salesmen.
Those that partake readily in fantasies can see them for what they are.
Those that repress the hard edge of logic are also easily devoured
by the serpent as it twines itself around the dagger hissing with its
forked tongue:
"I am here to save you..."
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 5, 2022 5:34:55 GMT
So much of our language is embedded in the idea of the fundamental difference between self and world ; its like a knife that slices the umbilical chord of the idea of a wholistic universe. But when you do make such a move precisely ; then this is what gives the mind what it needs to see the difference between real physics and sophistry. The intuition that led Newton to ponder the apple is itself inexplicable in terms of physics. Apples had been falling since the time of Eve... Its ironic that by only by defining clearly the difference between science and fantasy that we can see science for what it is, and are not duped by "science". Those who repress the creative and fantastical side of the mind then so easily contrive their false fantastical thoughts with science and mindlessly follow the illusions of the snake-oil salesmen. Those that partake readily in fantasies can see them for what they are. Those that repress the hard edge of logic are also easily devoured by the serpent as it twines itself around the dagger hissing with its forked tongue: "I am here to save you..." Your comments and particularly this one is a poetry. Excuse me for questions like that, but did you work in journalism? Or maybe you're a writer? I suspect you are. Shamefully for me not know it. Just want to admire how excellent the messages are written! I wish I could write at least a partially good. Even to write in Ukrainian isn't easy for me. Probably it causes by something psychologically deep. Honestly speaking I am a very humble person. The fact is I have to talk to people for work purposes or others. It happened dozens of times when people asked me to talk to them (also as a psychologist, however I had never been the one). That's why I see I have to talk, while all my life being alone was a really good side. Sorry for these confessions. I hope my message can be a better explanation of why the difference between the world and the self is viewed to be so wide. |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Feb 6, 2022 14:19:25 GMT
eugeneI am just a poor african poet. The essence of poetry is psychology. Its about seeing the truth in fairytales, and also seeing the make-believe stories ; dressed up in suit and tie so seriously they can easily lie. I did most of my 20's writing endless reams of poetry. As one explores the word ; so must one explore the mind. In the beginning was the word ...
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 6, 2022 15:34:06 GMT
eugene I am just a poor african poet. The essence of poetry is psychology. Its about seeing the truth in fairytales, and also seeing the make-believe stories ; dressed up in suit and tie so seriously they can easily lie. I did most of my 20's writing endless reams of poetry. As one explores the word ; so must one explore the mind. In the beginning was the word ... Not only. You've got a heart. A poet has to know the rythms of the heart beat. |
|
