Post by Eugene 2.0 on Dec 15, 2021 22:24:12 GMT
Imagine that:
• A believes thinking is a logical process or some mind work
• A guesses of knowledge as a thinking process
• A thinks he knows that p
• A isn't sure p is true
Also:
• B (and maybe C, sometimes D, and E...) persuades A that p is true
• B (and C, D, E...) explains to A that the others (F, G, I...) don't get or don't try to get into this knowledge completely, and that's why they've got no real info about it.
• B (C, D, E...) says that A, B, C, D... is a minority, an elite, so this also works better, because the lie is a shelter for fools, and fools are always in majority.
Along with it:
• Therefore, if A believes that p is true, then his knowledge is elitist (in case, nobody's been systematically deceiving him)
• If he rejects the idea p is true due to the minority holds it, he still doesn't have no justification for his knowledge (but nobody's been fooling him)
• If he believes p is false, because there is a minority believing the opposite, then his view is an egalitarian (but still he constructs his beliefs on some outer will or momentum decisions)
• A believes thinking is a logical process or some mind work
• A guesses of knowledge as a thinking process
• A thinks he knows that p
• A isn't sure p is true
Also:
• B (and maybe C, sometimes D, and E...) persuades A that p is true
• B (and C, D, E...) explains to A that the others (F, G, I...) don't get or don't try to get into this knowledge completely, and that's why they've got no real info about it.
• B (C, D, E...) says that A, B, C, D... is a minority, an elite, so this also works better, because the lie is a shelter for fools, and fools are always in majority.
Along with it:
• Therefore, if A believes that p is true, then his knowledge is elitist (in case, nobody's been systematically deceiving him)
• If he rejects the idea p is true due to the minority holds it, he still doesn't have no justification for his knowledge (but nobody's been fooling him)
• If he believes p is false, because there is a minority believing the opposite, then his view is an egalitarian (but still he constructs his beliefs on some outer will or momentum decisions)