Post by Eugene 2.0 on Dec 15, 2021 14:25:07 GMT
What kind of question the topic is going to raise? It says whether some type of knowledge has a social structure or not; can it be natural? Of course, we'd like to see some knowledge (or information) as personal, for instance, anything that can be perceived: colors, kinds of pain, anxiety, energy, etc. However, until this or other ones feelings are in one's head (i.e. still personal) all you're aware of is something fuzzy or messy. Indeed, to clarify that fuzziness one needs to provide a small analysis, but for this some logic is required. It's not impossible to continue thinking about it like:
A. to get logic is unnecessary since this kind of knowledge is immanent to a personal thinking. However, a person and a logic are given simultaneously?
B. to get logic one has to do some steps like bringing some analysis. Ok, but doesn't some analysis abilities are required for this operation?
C. to get logic is the same as to be joined to a game. What kind a game is it? – Just some kind of behaviour among the other ones like that one. (A living organisms among the other ones.)
First two seem to have few problems, while the third is out of it. At the same time, for the third we can ask then: should the one be surrounded by similar ones? Because it's not unnecessary to guess that there may be higher or lower intellectuals.
Anyway, if what is called the logic is required to be included into some processes, then further this question can be converted into a question whether this process is natural. And the nature is also a relevant one here? Because depending on it we may get another participant among individuals and societies – another type of intelligence.
As an example the reference – can it be that we can refer to something not being intellectuals? Or is it possible to refer beyond logic (or out of it)?
A. to get logic is unnecessary since this kind of knowledge is immanent to a personal thinking. However, a person and a logic are given simultaneously?
B. to get logic one has to do some steps like bringing some analysis. Ok, but doesn't some analysis abilities are required for this operation?
C. to get logic is the same as to be joined to a game. What kind a game is it? – Just some kind of behaviour among the other ones like that one. (A living organisms among the other ones.)
First two seem to have few problems, while the third is out of it. At the same time, for the third we can ask then: should the one be surrounded by similar ones? Because it's not unnecessary to guess that there may be higher or lower intellectuals.
Anyway, if what is called the logic is required to be included into some processes, then further this question can be converted into a question whether this process is natural. And the nature is also a relevant one here? Because depending on it we may get another participant among individuals and societies – another type of intelligence.
As an example the reference – can it be that we can refer to something not being intellectuals? Or is it possible to refer beyond logic (or out of it)?