|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 2, 2021 22:35:36 GMT
Given everything is reducible to "x" all distinctions are false thus necessitating the Law of Non-Contradiction as having faulty grounds. Using the example of the square peg and square hole one can see to opposite phenomena, the peg and the hole, equate through the common grounds of the square. The same occurs for the logical expression of +P=/=-P where both +P and -P both share the form of P.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Dec 3, 2021 15:17:57 GMT
The thing is the Law isn't almighty. It limits formal conditions. There is no contradictions among phenomenon. Contradiction is quite transcendent: time&space, modalities, existence; not particulars or universals.
A peg and a hole... what the example...
|
|