|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 24, 2021 21:56:53 GMT
If void is truly void then void must void void therefore resulting in being. Being is the observation of void.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 24, 2021 22:50:50 GMT
"Anything thinkable exists" said Parmenides
We can correct him saying that to disprove it is uneasy.
Not the same is about Nowhere. Here's it:
Everything that logically possible exists in one of possible worlds Wn
Nowhere is not here or there, but where? Nowhere.
Since Nowhere is Nowhere, it is logically possible, in turn, exists in Wn.
No logical possible worlds is in Nowhere
Nowhere is not Nowhere
Nowhere is logically impossible, that leads that Nowhere is in Nowhere
Nowhere is Nowhere and not Nowhere is Nowhere – is logically possible, that's why it is not Nowhere
Again, Nowhere is in Nowhere
Nowhere is Nowhere, and at the same time not Nowhere is logically impossible, ... so on
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 2, 2021 21:32:04 GMT
"Anything thinkable exists" said Parmenides We can correct him saying that to disprove it is uneasy. Not the same is about Nowhere. Here's it: Everything that logically possible exists in one of possible worlds W nNowhere is not here or there, but where? Nowhere. Since Nowhere is Nowhere, it is logically possible, in turn, exists in W n. No logical possible worlds is in Nowhere Nowhere is not Nowhere Nowhere is logically impossible, that leads that Nowhere is in Nowhere Nowhere is Nowhere and not Nowhere is Nowhere – is logically possible, that's why it is not Nowhere Again, Nowhere is in Nowhere Nowhere is Nowhere, and at the same time not Nowhere is logically impossible, ... so on 1. Void is the absence of being, logic is a manifestation of being, void is the absence of logic. 2. Void as the absence of logic is void as a contradiction. 3. A contradiction is the absence of unity within being, considering logic is the unity of propositions through their relations (therefore a unity of being considering all logic points to something), thus an absence of being as an absence of logic (considering being requires unity to occur and logic is connected to being). 4. Void is the absence of unity in being; to observe a void is to observe an absence of one being therefore necessitating a contrast between multiple beings (ie the contrast of a horse and blade of grass necessitates a void between the horse and blade of grass as each has respective qualities absence in the other.). 5. Void is contrast as contrast is an absence of being thus an absence of form, it is an absence of connection. Form is the negation of void as it is an absence of void as the absence of contrast. The absence of contrast is a singular form. All forms are singular events thus absent of void. 6. A being is the negation of multiplicity, as it is a singular entity, thus a negation of void as void can only be observed through multiplicity; a being is the voiding of void. 7. The voiding of void is self negation thus a contradiction, void as a contradiction necessitates the contradiction of contradiction. Void as an underlying contradiction contradicts void considering void is universal (as multiplicity through contrast is universal). 8. A true void is void of void if void is absolute. A true void can be observed as contradiction through "multiplicity as contrast". A universal contradiction contradicts itself thus ends in reason, therefore being, through a negation. Void negated is being; void negated is the contradiction of contradiction. ****Void is only observed in the absence of one being within another, ie the lack of qualities of one being within that of another. ****The voiding of void is the absence of nothingness as being; it is the absence of multiplicity thus a singular being occurs. Only being occurs; the void of void is being much in the same manner an absence of the absence of unity, as unity, occurs. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Dec 3, 2021 15:34:09 GMT
"Anything thinkable exists" said Parmenides We can correct him saying that to disprove it is uneasy. Not the same is about Nowhere. Here's it: Everything that logically possible exists in one of possible worlds W nNowhere is not here or there, but where? Nowhere. Since Nowhere is Nowhere, it is logically possible, in turn, exists in W n. No logical possible worlds is in Nowhere Nowhere is not Nowhere Nowhere is logically impossible, that leads that Nowhere is in Nowhere Nowhere is Nowhere and not Nowhere is Nowhere – is logically possible, that's why it is not Nowhere Again, Nowhere is in Nowhere Nowhere is Nowhere, and at the same time not Nowhere is logically impossible, ... so on 1. Void is the absence of being, logic is a manifestation of being, void is the absence of logic. 2. Void as the absence of logic is void as a contradiction. 3. A contradiction is the absence of unity within being, considering logic is the unity of propositions through their relations (therefore a unity of being considering all logic points to something), thus an absence of being as an absence of logic (considering being requires unity to occur and logic is connected to being). 4. Void is the absence of unity in being; to observe a void is to observe an absence of one being therefore necessitating a contrast between multiple beings (ie the contrast of a horse and blade of grass necessitates a void between the horse and blade of grass as each has respective qualities absence in the other.). 5. Void is contrast as contrast is an absence of being thus an absence of form, it is an absence of connection. Form is the negation of void as it is an absence of void as the absence of contrast. The absence of contrast is a singular form. All forms are singular events thus absent of void. 6. A being is the negation of multiplicity, as it is a singular entity, thus a negation of void as void can only be observed through multiplicity; a being is the voiding of void. 7. The voiding of void is self negation thus a contradiction, void as a contradiction necessitates the contradiction of contradiction. Void as an underlying contradiction contradicts void considering void is universal (as multiplicity through contrast is universal). 8. A true void is void of void if void is absolute. A true void can be observed as contradiction through "multiplicity as contrast". A universal contradiction contradicts itself thus ends in reason, therefore being, through a negation. Void negated is being; void negated is the contradiction of contradiction. ****Void is only observed in the absence of one being within another, ie the lack of qualities of one being within that of another. ****The voiding of void is the absence of nothingness as being; it is the absence of multiplicity thus a singular being occurs. Only being occurs; the void of void is being much in the same manner an absence of the absence of unity, as unity, occurs. The absence is also a manifestation, but, unlike the logical one, this manifestation is hidden, or implicit. Ok, the rest is ok. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 8, 2021 22:22:13 GMT
1. Void is the absence of being, logic is a manifestation of being, void is the absence of logic. 2. Void as the absence of logic is void as a contradiction. 3. A contradiction is the absence of unity within being, considering logic is the unity of propositions through their relations (therefore a unity of being considering all logic points to something), thus an absence of being as an absence of logic (considering being requires unity to occur and logic is connected to being). 4. Void is the absence of unity in being; to observe a void is to observe an absence of one being therefore necessitating a contrast between multiple beings (ie the contrast of a horse and blade of grass necessitates a void between the horse and blade of grass as each has respective qualities absence in the other.). 5. Void is contrast as contrast is an absence of being thus an absence of form, it is an absence of connection. Form is the negation of void as it is an absence of void as the absence of contrast. The absence of contrast is a singular form. All forms are singular events thus absent of void. 6. A being is the negation of multiplicity, as it is a singular entity, thus a negation of void as void can only be observed through multiplicity; a being is the voiding of void. 7. The voiding of void is self negation thus a contradiction, void as a contradiction necessitates the contradiction of contradiction. Void as an underlying contradiction contradicts void considering void is universal (as multiplicity through contrast is universal). 8. A true void is void of void if void is absolute. A true void can be observed as contradiction through "multiplicity as contrast". A universal contradiction contradicts itself thus ends in reason, therefore being, through a negation. Void negated is being; void negated is the contradiction of contradiction. ****Void is only observed in the absence of one being within another, ie the lack of qualities of one being within that of another. ****The voiding of void is the absence of nothingness as being; it is the absence of multiplicity thus a singular being occurs. Only being occurs; the void of void is being much in the same manner an absence of the absence of unity, as unity, occurs. The absence is also a manifestation, but, unlike the logical one, this manifestation is hidden, or implicit. Ok, the rest is ok. The absence only points to a relation between one thing and another thing; void can only be observed through being. This absence is a void of one set of qualities, in one phenomenon, when compare to that of another. For example a square is void of round edges when compare to a circle. To see a void is to see a relationship and this relationship necessitates multiplicity, not unity. Void occurs as multiplicity. |
|
