Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 24, 2021 8:17:22 GMT
• Someone (or something) S asks a human H player P whether or not he's a bot B.
• Which questions should be given to P to check whether the one is B?
• And which answers should P response to S to sure him P isn't B?
Alan Turing wrote a book about this. I don't remember his strategy for this game, but I suppose P can't give the correct answer since something important won't be added to.
° No matter which questions are, P is trying to disprove his participation of the class B.
° It's enough for the result to prove P belongs to H.
° To know the right answer it's necessary to know C: when B is false, while H is true, and vice versa.
° Since bots can imitate everything what is known about humans, there's no C.
° Moreover, how P can be sure he's not a machine? He might be pulled the wool over eyes by someone else.
° Considering the above, there's no chance to disprove it unless the proof methods are not only verbal or typed. I mean as soon as this is the real world with real physics this is supposed to be answered. And even in this case not everything is so clear for some hidden forces may hide the true nature from our eyes, and we may appear to be nothing, but puppets on strings.
• Which questions should be given to P to check whether the one is B?
• And which answers should P response to S to sure him P isn't B?
Alan Turing wrote a book about this. I don't remember his strategy for this game, but I suppose P can't give the correct answer since something important won't be added to.
° No matter which questions are, P is trying to disprove his participation of the class B.
° It's enough for the result to prove P belongs to H.
° To know the right answer it's necessary to know C: when B is false, while H is true, and vice versa.
° Since bots can imitate everything what is known about humans, there's no C.
° Moreover, how P can be sure he's not a machine? He might be pulled the wool over eyes by someone else.
° Considering the above, there's no chance to disprove it unless the proof methods are not only verbal or typed. I mean as soon as this is the real world with real physics this is supposed to be answered. And even in this case not everything is so clear for some hidden forces may hide the true nature from our eyes, and we may appear to be nothing, but puppets on strings.