Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 20, 2021 12:26:48 GMT
• Metaphysics: if there's A there must be something not-A considering not-A is B, C, or whatsoever. Also, A should be sustained by something, and that something might be as no-A or a tool (which is not-A, or B, or C... too). Notably the tool can be the third not necessary second extra element along with not-A.
• Social philosophy: If people always noded at everything, or they never had disagreement, this would rather be worse since it might lead either to no advancing rational skills, or not understanding each other – this is interesting taking into account as P. Grice theory so D. Davidson's theory of the receiver (A B C).
• Logic:
1. X is saying something → X is waving specific intervals W (given)
2. Y is hearing some specific intervals W → Y is hearing words (given)
3. There is no such Wn such that W is different to Wn or any W = Wn (given).
4. Y is hearing Wn (implied from 1-3).
5. X and Y both doesn't hear anything that Wn (implied from 1-4)
6. Theory of contrast is true: for any word W' is important to have a meaning M that is different for a word W'' (philosophical axiom)
7. W...Wn doesn't have any meaning at all, or W...Wn shares the same one meaning (implied by 1-6)
8. There happened no talk between X and Y, or X's waving sound have the same zero sense as Y's hearing that sound (implied by previous arguments).
• We can assume that these examples demonstrate importance of differences, in other words, at least within talks the differences must occur.
• Social philosophy: If people always noded at everything, or they never had disagreement, this would rather be worse since it might lead either to no advancing rational skills, or not understanding each other – this is interesting taking into account as P. Grice theory so D. Davidson's theory of the receiver (A B C).
• Logic:
1. X is saying something → X is waving specific intervals W (given)
2. Y is hearing some specific intervals W → Y is hearing words (given)
3. There is no such Wn such that W is different to Wn or any W = Wn (given).
4. Y is hearing Wn (implied from 1-3).
5. X and Y both doesn't hear anything that Wn (implied from 1-4)
6. Theory of contrast is true: for any word W' is important to have a meaning M that is different for a word W'' (philosophical axiom)
7. W...Wn doesn't have any meaning at all, or W...Wn shares the same one meaning (implied by 1-6)
8. There happened no talk between X and Y, or X's waving sound have the same zero sense as Y's hearing that sound (implied by previous arguments).
• We can assume that these examples demonstrate importance of differences, in other words, at least within talks the differences must occur.