|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 19, 2021 18:32:23 GMT
If God is the creator and man is made in the image of God then man is a creator; therefore the creation of the term "God" is man working in image of the creator with the creator creating the creator through the created.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 28, 2021 15:12:40 GMT
Nonsense. God isn't an imaginary deity, except for atheists.
|
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Oct 28, 2021 15:25:24 GMT
It's true that a man can be a mini creator. But all the same, everything a man does is within the limits that God has set.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 28, 2021 20:43:36 GMT
ΔιαμονδOf course! If God had decided to create "another creator similar to God", He would have repeated Himself, or made His copy. But there's nothing meaningful for God to do this.
|
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Oct 28, 2021 21:08:18 GMT
It's true that a man can be a mini creator. But all the same, everything a man does is within the limits that God has set. Of course! If God had decided to create "another creator similar to God", He would have repeated Himself, or made His copy. But there's nothing meaningful for God to do this. Slow down, Diamond, ...for I am thinking of a British reverend who objected to the newly invented art of photography, because photographers claimed that they could produce Images of real things. Said he: There is only one possible image: Jesus Christ, the image of his father (God).// Of course, no theologian [outside some ancient Christian sects] believes that God created [or used] other creators. Anyway, I doubt that creators or anything can be created,... or annihilated. Cqn you imagine what would happen to the world, if only a new leaf would be added to it???? or if a hundred fish sandwiches were added to it to feed the multitudes? Imagine the feeding today of a billion people just fo |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 29, 2021 3:15:27 GMT
It's true that a man can be a mini creator. But all the same, everything a man does is within the limits that God has set. Of course! If God had decided to create "another creator similar to God", He would have repeated Himself, or made His copy. But there's nothing meaningful for God to do this. Slow down, Diamond, ...for I am thinking of a British reverend who objected to the newly invented art of photography, because photographers claimed that they could produce Images of real things. Said he: There is only one possible image: Jesus Christ, the image of his father (God).// Of course, no theologian [outside some ancient Christian sects] believes that God created [or used] other creators. Anyway, I doubt that creators or anything can be created,... or annihilated. Cqn you imagine what would happen to the world, if only a new leaf would be added to it???? or if a hundred fish sandwiches were added to it to feed the multitudes? Imagine the feeding today of a billion people just fo It was my fault occasionally to put a comment since words "Of course" to a Diamond's comment. Then I separated again them. Just wanted you know it. So, if you don't want to answer, because there was a part of my answer. If you'd like to, you can ask for deleting the comment. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 2, 2021 23:33:45 GMT
Nonsense. God isn't an imaginary deity, except for atheists. The term "God" is not imaginary however...as I said before: "therefore the creation of the term "God" is man working in image of the creator with the creator creating the creator through the created" In many defining God God is defining himself. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 2, 2021 23:35:04 GMT
Διαμονδ Of course! If God had decided to create "another creator similar to God", He would have repeated Himself, or made His copy. But there's nothing meaningful for God to do this. Man made in the image of God is God existing through time and space because of his omnipresence....time and space demand repetition for something to exist. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 2, 2021 23:36:56 GMT
It's true that a man can be a mini creator. But all the same, everything a man does is within the limits that God has set. God in his omnipresence exists through the limited and unlimited. In the limits of God being defined by Man, Man as an extension of God is God defining himself in time and space. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 14, 2021 21:11:10 GMT
Nonsense. God isn't an imaginary deity, except for atheists. The term "God" is not imaginary however...as I said before: "therefore the creation of the term "God" is man working in image of the creator with the creator creating the creator through the created" In many defining God God is defining himself. Seems like a part of you're resisting an atheistic thought, so that's indeed good. The term "God" is a term. This doesn't automatically mean something definitely positive. Of course if you're not one of those Jewish gematria tradition followers, because, honestly, that Jewish tradition sucks. A person who doesn't want to be a stiff-necked one must understand that God is the One and the Only, the Alpha and Omega of the University and all what's been created and will be created. No need those archivers or compressing theories of, for instance, how can the name "God" can be extracted from a certain formula. Why? Are there nothing to do good? Faith, the real faith is not in deciphering Bible text, it's a really real and the reality real thing – is living a real life. Jesus Christ objected Pharisees, and contrary to that He cared mostly about fishermen, tax-gatherers, and shepherds. Ordinary people are not really so ordinary. That "ordinariness" is something itchy for "the intellectuals", for the new Pharisees. The term "God" is imaginary only for atheists – for those who does not care about believing in God and prayers. Yes, for them it is "imaginary". |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Nov 16, 2021 2:34:45 GMT
The term "God" is not imaginary however...as I said before: "therefore the creation of the term "God" is man working in image of the creator with the creator creating the creator through the created" In many defining God God is defining himself. Seems like a part of you're resisting an atheistic thought, so that's indeed good. The term "God" is a term. This doesn't automatically mean something definitely positive. Of course if you're not one of those Jewish gematria tradition followers, because, honestly, that Jewish tradition sucks. A person who doesn't want to be a stiff-necked one must understand that God is the One and the Only, the Alpha and Omega of the University and all what's been created and will be created. No need those archivers or compressing theories of, for instance, how can the name "God" can be extracted from a certain formula. Why? Are there nothing to do good? Faith, the real faith is not in deciphering Bible text, it's a really real and the reality real thing – is living a real life. Jesus Christ objected Pharisees, and contrary to that He cared mostly about fishermen, tax-gatherers, and shepherds. Ordinary people are not really so ordinary. That "ordinariness" is something itchy for "the intellectuals", for the new Pharisees. The term "God" is imaginary only for atheists – for those who does not care about believing in God and prayers. Yes, for them it is "imaginary". You call it stupid (gematria that is) and yet your entire framework is derived from bits and pieces of the religion that geometry comes from |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 16, 2021 9:43:01 GMT
Seems like a part of you're resisting an atheistic thought, so that's indeed good. The term "God" is a term. This doesn't automatically mean something definitely positive. Of course if you're not one of those Jewish gematria tradition followers, because, honestly, that Jewish tradition sucks. A person who doesn't want to be a stiff-necked one must understand that God is the One and the Only, the Alpha and Omega of the University and all what's been created and will be created. No need those archivers or compressing theories of, for instance, how can the name "God" can be extracted from a certain formula. Why? Are there nothing to do good? Faith, the real faith is not in deciphering Bible text, it's a really real and the reality real thing – is living a real life. Jesus Christ objected Pharisees, and contrary to that He cared mostly about fishermen, tax-gatherers, and shepherds. Ordinary people are not really so ordinary. That "ordinariness" is something itchy for "the intellectuals", for the new Pharisees. The term "God" is imaginary only for atheists – for those who does not care about believing in God and prayers. Yes, for them it is "imaginary". You call it stupid (gematria that is) and yet your entire framework is derived from bits and pieces of the religion that geometry comes from Gematria – the method to understand texts and Geometry – calculation of spatial figures are not the same. |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Nov 16, 2021 20:34:29 GMT
You call it stupid (gematria that is) and yet your entire framework is derived from bits and pieces of the religion that geometry comes from Gematria – the method to understand texts and Geometry – calculation of spatial figures are not the same. Gematria comes from the Kabbalah the Kabbalah is the spiritual side of Judaism Judaism is the daddy of Christianity. All one big happy family |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 17, 2021 16:59:28 GMT
Gematria – the method to understand texts and Geometry – calculation of spatial figures are not the same. Gematria comes from the Kabbalah the Kabbalah is the spiritual side of Judaism Judaism is the daddy of Christianity. All one big happy family Greek influence to Christianity was too fat and too major. Not few books confirm it. For instance, Russell's comparison them with the Stoic school. Different papers of the Father of Church, i.e. like Origenes, St. Justin the Philosopher, and many others. Indeed these two branches don't have many similarities. Of course, for non theists these two branches are heading one point. If to say it in a more precise and in a more correct way: those two branches are pursuing two points which in general has one direction - a theistic one. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 18, 2021 23:50:27 GMT
The term "God" is not imaginary however...as I said before: "therefore the creation of the term "God" is man working in image of the creator with the creator creating the creator through the created" In many defining God God is defining himself. Seems like a part of you're resisting an atheistic thought, so that's indeed good. The term "God" is a term. This doesn't automatically mean something definitely positive. Of course if you're not one of those Jewish gematria tradition followers, because, honestly, that Jewish tradition sucks. A person who doesn't want to be a stiff-necked one must understand that God is the One and the Only, the Alpha and Omega of the University and all what's been created and will be created. No need those archivers or compressing theories of, for instance, how can the name "God" can be extracted from a certain formula. Why? Are there nothing to do good? Faith, the real faith is not in deciphering Bible text, it's a really real and the reality real thing – is living a real life. Jesus Christ objected Pharisees, and contrary to that He cared mostly about fishermen, tax-gatherers, and shepherds. Ordinary people are not really so ordinary. That "ordinariness" is something itchy for "the intellectuals", for the new Pharisees. The term "God" is imaginary only for atheists – for those who does not care about believing in God and prayers. Yes, for them it is "imaginary". The creation of the term "God" is God creating himself in time and space through his image (man). |
|
