|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 19, 2021 17:32:11 GMT
The law of non-contradiction is false. "A unicorn does not exist in the mind" and "a unicorn exists in the mind" can both be true given the underlying context of "the unicorn exists in a field in the mind". The unicorn exists in contrast to the field thus it exists in one respect. However the field is not the unicorn thus the presence of the field is an absence of the unicorn; the unicorn may exist in the field but it is not the field. Under the same context of mind the unicorn both exists, as itself, and does not exist, as the field.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 26, 2021 23:43:18 GMT
1. Red and no red are both true at the same time under the nature of "redish-yellow". The context of redish yellow necessitates there being both red and not red under the same context, ie redish yellow. Dually one redish yellow may be 80% yellow and 20% red and another redish yellow may be 90% red and 10% yellow yet they are both redish yellow, one redish yellow as one mix exists and another redish yellow of another mix still exists.
The first redish yellow, as x, is not the second redish yellow, as y, yet redish yellow exists in two states with one not being the other therefore x exists and non x, as y, exists at the same time in the same respect. Redish yellow exists in two states with one state not being the other state. "x" and "not x" (ie "y) exist at the same time and the same respect over the middle context of "redish yellow".
2. Time is a duration thus along one timeline a color may be 90% yellow and %10 brown then change to %80 yellow and 20% brown.
You cannot seperate time from a duration considering even an "instant", such as a clock hand moving a second, is a duration. Even the instant of swallowing food is a duration of time. There is no action which does not occur over a duration of time thus something may both be itself and not be itself at the same time considering time is a length.
3. The law of non contradiction is a relative truth and as relative falls under a nature of self-referentiality within the laws of logic, ie the laws relative to themselves. In applying the law of excluded middle to the principle of identity and law of non-contradiction the principle of identity may be chosen as true with the law of non-contradiction as false given either the principle of identity exists or the principle of non-contradiction.
|
|
