|
|
Post by jonbain on Oct 5, 2021 10:54:16 GMT
if anyone is struggling to connect the dots,
please ask which part of this,
you do not understand
my only real quibble, is that it should really be called world war 4, although some people say its the second cold war
only a miracle can save this world now its no coincidence that facebook has just collapsed as these events unfold
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 24, 2021 15:13:41 GMT
I guess that the rise of the corps are something that China or Japan (or perhaps maybe the other ones Eastern countries) started. What do I mean?
I want to say that it seems like the corps act like the Medieval Japanese or China's castles: just the same structure and principles.
Not only this analogy, but that still in Japan many complanies work like that. I think it may be sufficient to bring one half-documentary book of Amelie Nothomb named "Stupeur et Tremblements" (1999?).
But I think that China won't be lie Britain in XIX empire. If to divide conquerors into two categories we can find that almost every country is more or less conquerors, because they usurp their regions or closed territories; into another one we can put those great conquerors like Alexander the Great did. So,
China would not be in that. Muslims would: they were great conquerors, Japan would be: Japanese were great conquerors, Russia too: Russians were great conquerors.
I think that it's fair only for any great conquerors to be afraid of being conquered by another one conquer. Actually, I do hate that stupid conquer politics. I guess any conquerors are not humans at all.
|
|
