|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 30, 2021 21:46:37 GMT
To say the perfect circle is abstracted from particulars is to make a relative statement: particulars --> universals. But considering it is relative the statement may be revervsed and therefore state: Universals ---> Particulars. This leads to absolute forms and the negation of relativity under the statement: "All is relative including this statement that all is relative".
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 31, 2021 21:34:05 GMT
To say the perfect circle is abstracted from particulars is to make a relative statement: particulars --> universals. But considering it is relative the statement may be revervsed and therefore state: Universals ---> Particulars. This leads to absolute forms and the negation of relativity under the statement: "All is relative including this statement that all is relative". To say the perfect circle is abstracted from particulars is to make a relative statement: particulars --> universals. But considering it is relative the statement may be reversed and therefore state: Universals ---> Particulars. This leads to absolute forms existing prior to particulars, therefore particulars being the approximations of absolutes. This further results in the negation of relativity under the statement: "All is relative including this statement that all is relative". |
|
