|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 30, 2021 20:42:27 GMT
Nothingness as a concept is the act of differentiation of phenomenon where one phenomenon, relative to another, lacks some quality of the former.
Pure Nothingness does not exist as pure void voids itself if it is a total void. Thus to speak of pure nothingness is to speak of a contradiction which in turn says nothing at all.
""Pure nothingness is an absence of concept" and this statement is a concept". <<<< This sentence is a contradiction thus equating nothingness to a contradiction, ie absence of reason.
|
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 2, 2021 9:33:00 GMT
Were you an only child?. And do not have a job right now? Asking for a friend.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 7, 2021 18:20:40 GMT
Were you an only child?. And do not have a job right now? Asking for a friend. Your ad-hominums only point to your inability to argue a point. To address your stance, how can there be multiplicity in phenomena without one phenomenon being absent of qualities found in another? This absence of a quality in a phenomenon is a void of said quality thus a void. |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 9, 2021 9:26:29 GMT
Were you an only child?. And do not have a job right now? Asking for a friend. Your ad-hominums only point to your inability to argue a point. To address your stance, how can there be multiplicity in phenomena without one phenomenon being absent of qualities found in another? This absence of a quality in a phenomenon is a void of said quality thus a void. Addressing the character and cognitive abilities of the person presenting information is a very valid thing to do because it is valid plain and simple. Let's assume for a moment that you're correct about void (which you're not but we're just assuming for hypothetical reasons that you are.) How does this help you in any way shape or form with your walk through life? Or how does it help anybody else? |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 13, 2021 21:19:27 GMT
Your ad-hominums only point to your inability to argue a point. To address your stance, how can there be multiplicity in phenomena without one phenomenon being absent of qualities found in another? This absence of a quality in a phenomenon is a void of said quality thus a void. Addressing the character and cognitive abilities of the person presenting information is a very valid thing to do because it is valid plain and simple. Let's assume for a moment that you're correct about void (which you're not but we're just assuming for hypothetical reasons that you are.) How does this help you in any way shape or form with your walk through life? Or how does it help anybody else? 1. Then for the record, yes I do have a job and friends and no I am not an only child. But even making this acknowledgement is faulty as any terms addressed away from the argument and towards the arguer are subject to a nature of ad-hominums. An ad-hominum is a diversion away from the argument and towards the arguer (as you where previously doing). The fallacy lies in the diversion of one topic to another. 2. As to the practical benefits I have stated this elsewhere on another post you ignored: In observing the void nature of reality one becomes less greedy, lustful, and overall selfish because the things over which one is greedy, lustful and selfish are acknowledged as fundamentally empty in themselves. They do not exist on there own terms and are dependent upon further contexts. The observation of the emptiness of phenomena, evidenced through continual change, negates any possessiveness of things because of their transitory nature. 3. If you claim I am wrong in stating absolute void is a contradiction then you are disagreeing with yourself as you argue the same thing. To state "absolute void" is to negate the very nature of said void by observing something. Absolute void is a contradiction thus making any statement about absolute void inherently empty of meaning. Relative void is the absence of a quality within one phenomenon relative to another, ie the phenomenon is absent of a quality thus void of it. 4. Again you are avoiding the question: To address your stance, how can there be multiplicity in phenomena without one phenomenon being absent of qualities found in another? This absence of a quality in a phenomenon is a void of said quality thus a void. |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 14, 2021 8:07:43 GMT
Addressing the character and cognitive abilities of the person presenting information is a very valid thing to do because it is valid plain and simple. Let's assume for a moment that you're correct about void (which you're not but we're just assuming for hypothetical reasons that you are.) How does this help you in any way shape or form with your walk through life? Or how does it help anybody else? 1. Then for the record, yes I do have a job and friends and no I am not an only child. But even making this acknowledgement is faulty as any terms addressed away from the argument and towards the arguer are subject to a nature of ad-hominums. An ad-hominum is a diversion away from the argument and towards the arguer (as you where previously doing). The fallacy lies in the diversion of one topic to another. 2. As to the practical benefits I have stated this elsewhere on another post you ignored: In observing the void nature of reality one becomes less greedy, lustful, and overall selfish because the things over which one is greedy, lustful and selfish are acknowledged as fundamentally empty in themselves. They do not exist on there own terms and are dependent upon further contexts. The observation of the emptiness of phenomena, evidenced through continual change, negates any possessiveness of things because of their transitory nature. 3. If you claim I am wrong in stating absolute void is a contradiction then you are disagreeing with yourself as you argue the same thing. To state "absolute void" is to negate the very nature of said void by observing something. Absolute void is a contradiction thus making any statement about absolute void inherently empty of meaning. Relative void is the absence of a quality within one phenomenon relative to another, ie the phenomenon is absent of a quality thus void of it. 4. Again you are avoiding the question: To address your stance, how can there be multiplicity in phenomena without one phenomenon being absent of qualities found in another? This absence of a quality in a phenomenon is a void of said quality thus a void.1. You clean too these fallacies as if they are flawless and the inherent word of the all Creator when their words concepts and ideas made by men most likely a few hundred years ago and have no more validity in a conversation than the live person that's speaking so to just brush something off as an ad hominem and not giving it any thought whatsoever is an ignorant thing to do. If I were to write in a book that you're supposed to eat dog shit and authenticate it as a couple hundred years old and then have a college teach it would you then go out and eat dog shit? Where's the limit to what you'll do if it's peer-reviewed? And lastly if we are indeed talking about the same thing then why are you even talking about it because there's no point in talking about it because it can't be talked about so why waste your breath sounding like a moron on the internet talking around it? |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 14, 2021 20:54:00 GMT
1. You clean too these fallacies as if they are flawless and the inherent word of the all Creator when their words concepts and ideas made by men most likely a few hundred years ago and have no more validity in a conversation than the live person that's speaking so to just brush something off as an ad hominem and not giving it any thought whatsoever is an ignorant thing to do. If I were to write in a book that you're supposed to eat dog shit and authenticate it as a couple hundred years old and then have a college teach it would you then go out and eat dog shit? Where's the limit to what you'll do if it's peer-reviewed? And lastly if we are indeed talking about the same thing then why are you even talking about it because there's no point in talking about it because it can't be talked about so why waste your breath sounding like a moron on the internet talking around it? 1. Again you are avoiding the question: To address your stance, how can there be multiplicity in phenomena without one phenomenon being absent of qualities found in another? This absence of a quality in a phenomenon is a void of said quality thus a void. 2. To talk about void is to talk about the nature of contradictions. |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 15, 2021 5:51:40 GMT
1. You clean too these fallacies as if they are flawless and the inherent word of the all Creator when their words concepts and ideas made by men most likely a few hundred years ago and have no more validity in a conversation than the live person that's speaking so to just brush something off as an ad hominem and not giving it any thought whatsoever is an ignorant thing to do. If I were to write in a book that you're supposed to eat dog shit and authenticate it as a couple hundred years old and then have a college teach it would you then go out and eat dog shit? Where's the limit to what you'll do if it's peer-reviewed? And lastly if we are indeed talking about the same thing then why are you even talking about it because there's no point in talking about it because it can't be talked about so why waste your breath sounding like a moron on the internet talking around it? 1. Again you are avoiding the question: To address your stance, how can there be multiplicity in phenomena without one phenomenon being absent of qualities found in another? This absence of a quality in a phenomenon is a void of said quality thus a void. 2. To talk about void is to talk about the nature of contradictions. Like I said a dozen times I think you are misusing the word void. And to talk about the nature of contradictions is to talk about the nature of contradictions it's not anything other than that that would be like me saying I drink water which is why the sun comes up now I drink water and the sun comes up the two are not necessarily correlated and directly affecting each other and they're certainly not the same thing. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 20, 2021 20:56:57 GMT
1. Again you are avoiding the question: To address your stance, how can there be multiplicity in phenomena without one phenomenon being absent of qualities found in another? This absence of a quality in a phenomenon is a void of said quality thus a void. 2. To talk about void is to talk about the nature of contradictions. Like I said a dozen times I think you are misusing the word void. And to talk about the nature of contradictions is to talk about the nature of contradictions it's not anything other than that that would be like me saying I drink water which is why the sun comes up now I drink water and the sun comes up the two are not necessarily correlated and directly affecting each other and they're certainly not the same thing. Like I said before and I will state again: 1. To speak of an absolute void is a contradiction as you are acknowledging something through the use of the term "void". 2. To speak of a relative void is to observe the relationship between one thing and another with this relationship pointing towards the absence of one quality in one phenomenon which is not absent in the other. 3. Because talking about absolute void is a contradictions we understand the limits of language through said contradictions. Because a contradiction results in fundamentally nothing, to speak of absolute void as a contradiction is to reflect said contradiction where in talking about absolute void one is talking about nothing. |
|
