|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 23, 2021 23:38:10 GMT
Perception as the grounding of truth necessitates a principle beyond perception, through which perception exists, given perception as a relative absolute exists absolutely thus is grounded in an absolute absolute. In simpler terms view a circle. This circle is labeled "perception". This circle exists inside another circle which is labeled "principle". Considering "principle" exists as beyond "perception" we observe it as existing through the negative limits of perception where "principle" is defined by what perception is "not". What perception is not is a negative limit which defines principle for what it is. In simpler terms principle is defined through what perception is not thus necessitating something existing beyond perception by observing perception for where it is lacking. This lacking of something in perception necessitates something existing beyond perception which is related to perception but not limited to it.
|
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Aug 25, 2021 15:21:30 GMT
Why do you say that perception is the grounding of truth or, rather, on what grounds do you postulate that perception is the gounding of any true judgment? And why is there the necessity of a principle? Isn't it obvious that perception has to be grounded on perception? ... that [your] perception is its own principle?
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Aug 30, 2021 20:28:22 GMT
Why do you say that perception is the grounding of truth or, rather, on what grounds do you postulate that perception is the gounding of any true judgment? And why is there the necessity of a principle? Isn't it obvious that perception has to be grounded on perception? ... that [your] perception is its own principle? 1. "All truth exists as observed" with this in itself being observed thus a mirroring process results. The truth is observed and is mirrored as a thought and this thought repeats through actions or further thoughts. 2. To say all truth is grounded in perception is in itself a perception thus perception repeats itself through recursion into different forms. 3. This repetition of perception, into further perception, necessitates perception as existing through a principle of recursion that, while observed, exists beyond perception as it guides perception. While that which guides perception may be observed it is not observed in its totality as repetition itself is beyond sight. One may observe repetition occur in one phenomenon but one cannot observe it in its totality. One cannot observe the totality of all that repeats thus necessitating perception as being guided by a principle. This principle is a "way of being" and this "way of being" can be equivocated to a giant circle with a smaller circle, ie that of "perception", within it. So while perception is a principle this principle exists beyond perception as one cannot observe it fully. One can observe recursion but not the totality of recursion thus necessitating recursion, as a principle, existing beyond sight. |
|
