|
Post by jonbain on Jul 28, 2021 11:23:15 GMT
Just another expose' of the corruption of the scientific method.
Though somebody the other day told me: "I got an A for a paper on this, so you are wrong!"
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 29, 2021 10:43:10 GMT
When I was young and scrolling pages in books in physics some of such themes I listed. And among them were the interference and polarization. And there were those pictures with two (or one) holes and a screen behind all this. And one of the first thought that came to my mind was: "Didn't those holes non-ideal forms?" - I mean when you want to calculate something, while the walls of those holes are indeed particles (more or less similar to those, because any atoms of metal or solid surfaces have electrons on their orbits), and that's why we can see that chaotic picture. Well, that's what came to my mind as an explanation.
Another interesting thing was about glass prisms and the light reflection. Textbooks said that the glass prisms in a proper angle allow to get 100% reflection of the light. If we imagine a triangle (as to look at the prism from one side), then a light has to move perpendicular to one of the triangle's leg and then hitting the hypotenuse it has to 90* strikes to another leg, and then comes out 100% reflection. Just let me think - is it true? Does anyone try to check it out?
P.S. I see that in the forum you don't you laTex, do you? What about to try it? There are many on the linux and its distributives? Even without the latex the formulas are comprehensible, but latex can get them be strictly like in the physics notation.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Jul 29, 2021 17:19:44 GMT
Eugene 2.0i get your first paragraph you need to demonstrate your 2nd paragraph with a diagram, but as far as i know latex is a type of rubber material for making condoms have you seen this weird thing:
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 29, 2021 20:19:20 GMT
Eugene 2.0 i get your first paragraph you need to demonstrate your 2nd paragraph with a diagram, but as far as i know latex is a type of rubber material for making condoms have you seen this weird thing: No, no... I apologize for not giving any link. This LaTex I mentioned.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Jul 30, 2021 9:42:21 GMT
Eugene 2.0Well, that just looks like bureaucracy for the sake of bureaucracy at best; but more likely its just another trap of pseudo-science. It has lots of meaningless technical jargon lacking any real substance. My publications are in html, which gets me search engine rankings of 1st / million or better on numerous occasions. I would be taking a step backwards to go there. You are better off just typing on this forum. But I feel quite certain that the cronies are using such things to recycle money in their corrupt academic ponzi-scheme plenty. They typically rely on those outsiders buying in at the bottom of the ponzi-scheme of their bloated bureaucracies.
|
|