Post by Triangle on Jul 20, 2021 12:52:30 GMT
1. The Tao doesnt have a limit, but the limit of Tao is beyond the consciousness of Tao.
2. There is no Tao in logics, but Tao can be like a reasoning. Socrates is imortal because the soul is imortal. But his logic cannot be strutured as logical.
3. The subtle meaning of Tao can only be expressed as a Tao beyond Tao. But his reason of existence can only be structured as spontaneous.
4. The characteristics of Tao are inaprehensible. But his meaning is clear.
5. There is no ontology of Tao, but can only be defined as a having and doing.
6. The Tao can only be expressed as a movement.
7. Tao can be the becoming considered as a movement.
8. There is no identity of what we can name as Tao reason.
9. Tao cannot be expressed as a law.
So, I conclude that Tao is and ex-optic movement which we cannot perceive because is bellow our natural perception.
But there is another thing beyond Tao:
1. The consciousness of this movement leads to natural perception.
And If we try to mantain that perception, we realize Tao as an natural aspect of society. We see the Tao in things, as chinese people do.
1. The functionality of that perception, or Tao perception can be perfectioned.
2. So, the priority of Tao is the inconclusive, or the inconclusive meaning.
And in that "inconclusiveness" resides the first contact with the Tao we have.
So, Tao is an atribute of movement and can be only be expressed as categories of movement, which are the symbols we express the Tao.
Beyond that symbol resides the effect. And in the effect we achieve the true meaning.
These categories of movement can be expressed as signals. And in these signals resides the secret of the apreehension of the Tao.
2. There is no Tao in logics, but Tao can be like a reasoning. Socrates is imortal because the soul is imortal. But his logic cannot be strutured as logical.
3. The subtle meaning of Tao can only be expressed as a Tao beyond Tao. But his reason of existence can only be structured as spontaneous.
4. The characteristics of Tao are inaprehensible. But his meaning is clear.
5. There is no ontology of Tao, but can only be defined as a having and doing.
6. The Tao can only be expressed as a movement.
7. Tao can be the becoming considered as a movement.
8. There is no identity of what we can name as Tao reason.
9. Tao cannot be expressed as a law.
So, I conclude that Tao is and ex-optic movement which we cannot perceive because is bellow our natural perception.
But there is another thing beyond Tao:
1. The consciousness of this movement leads to natural perception.
And If we try to mantain that perception, we realize Tao as an natural aspect of society. We see the Tao in things, as chinese people do.
1. The functionality of that perception, or Tao perception can be perfectioned.
2. So, the priority of Tao is the inconclusive, or the inconclusive meaning.
And in that "inconclusiveness" resides the first contact with the Tao we have.
So, Tao is an atribute of movement and can be only be expressed as categories of movement, which are the symbols we express the Tao.
Beyond that symbol resides the effect. And in the effect we achieve the true meaning.
These categories of movement can be expressed as signals. And in these signals resides the secret of the apreehension of the Tao.
