|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 19, 2021 22:28:54 GMT
I want ask men mainly – all what you want is sex? All what you want is to have perverted in-and-out with ladies? So are you gonna sell your souls for making it real? Really? If you are, how can you respect yourselves?
Desires must not lead men in their relationships. Just think about it – you are being pulled by something; and while that you do not lead anything. If you're about be a leader, why desires blind you? A man is not a stick machine, he is not who has only "johnson" and "kiwis"; you do have a head, so if you're superior to your "johnson's factory" you should keep your head awaken.
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP 
Elder
Posts: 2,728 
Likes: 1,763
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 31
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Jul 20, 2021 7:41:04 GMT
In one of the two instances when God spoke to me the clearest, God told me that men controlled by their desires, womanizers, lechers, ****boys whatever you want to call them are scumbags. This is God, the most powerful being and creator of the universe calling these male s luts scumbags, and that exact word was used. Promiscuous people of both sexes I would add are scumbags. Sex is supposed to be something you are to give your wife or husband and them alone and if you've given it away to some s lut male or female you have made a grave mistake. I am a 27-year-old virgin and very proud of that fact and if I marry a woman she must be a virgin too because that fact alone says a lot about a woman's character.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 20, 2021 9:43:47 GMT
In one of the two instances when God spoke to me the clearest, God told me that men controlled by their desires, womanizers, lechers, ****boys whatever you want to call them are scumbags. This is God, the most powerful being and creator of the universe calling these male s luts scumbags, and that exact word was used. Promiscuous people of both sexes I would add are scumbags. Sex is supposed to be something you are to give your wife or husband and them alone and if you've given it away to some s lut male or female you have made a grave mistake. I am a 27-year-old virgin and very proud of that fact and if I marry a woman she must be a virgin too because that fact alone says a lot about a woman's character. As I know Bible said that many folks had the revelation of God (in the other version, God gave the rules of the law to all the folks in past), but only Jews followed to these revelations. And in Bible we see what terrible consequences happened to those Sodom and Gomorrah, and the others. And during the past history those craziness weren't shared as it's now. I guess more seriously it came from the era of Enlightenment, and more aggressive since 70's of XX. And after that men got weaker and weaker. So, as soon as it appeared it became the true plague that parasite men's minds and body. I think that proper and adequate education would save from it, but with such an education as now could it be performed? The media resources – this devil's chamber – firstly teaches us that almost every man is a beast and that he doesn't think anything else, except for sex, sex, sex..., and now that media tries to pursue us that these men are dangerous and evil... I proud to know that there are still men whose priorities over the sex, and who wants to see his fiancée virgins and non-perverted. Must say that girls are being suffering of this plague too. That media also keep imposing them to be free, while under that this is nothing, but the same subliminal message – to have sex with as many men as possible. I think that we be fatal mistake to open families inner lives, making them ,for instance, taking parts in numerous "reality shows" or sorta. The family must be the ultimately important element of society. I think that those pretexts to save wives from family cruelty are mostly another trick to unlock a family sacred life. When there's no private life of family, there are only some promiscuous relationships, and as the result – no true intimate life. Plus to those agenda of pornography. This is awful. At first they impose the iconic image of "the perfect women", and then after they say that men object women... So, what I do not understand still – why to trust to any media resource? I'd better stay an ignorant. And in last years, especially by most of modernists and postmodernists, the society, a person, and a family became more open and revealed. As I said, thank GOD, that there are still true Christians! |
|
Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on Jul 20, 2021 10:57:05 GMT
A pure desire for love cannot be judge. If you are only talking about the physics of love, and not about the ethics, and morals, as Roger Scruton says, you're forgotting what love is about.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 20, 2021 11:11:01 GMT
A pure desire for love cannot be judge. If you are only talking about the physics of love, and not about the ethics, and morals, as Roger Scruton says, you're forgotting what love is about. I should add: I didn't talking about the concept of love. However, someone may call love what is only the animal passion. If a person (a man) thinks he can think of his "love" (the animal passion) is really wrong. It's the same as to justify your own cruelty thinking that this is just a way of live. |
|
Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on Jul 20, 2021 11:18:32 GMT
A pure desire for love cannot be judge. If you are only talking about the physics of love, and not about the ethics, and morals, as Roger Scruton says, you're forgotting what love is about. I should add: I didn't talking about the concept of love. However, someone may call love what is only the animal passion. If a person (a man) thinks he can think of his "love" (the animal passion) is really wrong. It's the same as to justify your own cruelty thinking that this is just a way of live. So, Roger Scruton talks about the desire being ruled by morals. It's not complicated. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 20, 2021 11:48:59 GMT
I should add: I didn't talking about the concept of love. However, someone may call love what is only the animal passion. If a person (a man) thinks he can think of his "love" (the animal passion) is really wrong. It's the same as to justify your own cruelty thinking that this is just a way of live. So, Roger Scruton talks about the desire being ruled by morals. It's not complicated. Then how can a pure desire not be judged, if it concerns the morality as the first presumption? |
|
Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on Jul 20, 2021 11:51:26 GMT
So, Roger Scruton talks about the desire being ruled by morals. It's not complicated. Then how can a pure desire not be judged, if it concerns the morality as the first presumption? But morality only concerns judgement? |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 20, 2021 12:59:27 GMT
Then how can a pure desire not be judged, if it concerns the morality as the first presumption? But morality only concerns judgement? I think yea if we wish to know what we do. Because when I do something and want to know is it moral, I have to either identify it with one of accepted moral law (let's say, in some ethical book), or to think about it philosophically. I guess it's possible to be moral never asking about it, but how do we know whether we're moral never thinking about it? To find out that we are moral we need to think about it, and, therefore, to make some judgements about it. |
|
Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on Jul 20, 2021 13:02:10 GMT
But morality only concerns judgement? I think yea if we wish to know what we do. Because when I do something and want to know is it moral, I have to either identify it with one of accepted moral law (let's say, in some ethical book), or to think about it philosophically. I guess it's possible to be moral never asking about it, but how do we know whether we're moral never thinking about it? To find out that we are moral we need to think about it, and, therefore, to make some judgements about it. Sure we can, haha. We only think by judging? |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 20, 2021 13:15:17 GMT
I think yea if we wish to know what we do. Because when I do something and want to know is it moral, I have to either identify it with one of accepted moral law (let's say, in some ethical book), or to think about it philosophically. I guess it's possible to be moral never asking about it, but how do we know whether we're moral never thinking about it? To find out that we are moral we need to think about it, and, therefore, to make some judgements about it. Sure we can, haha. We only think by judging? And what is the process of thinking if not judging? How can I get: SaP or ', Socrates is a mortal' If previously I haven't done this: MaP or 'All men are mortal' SaM or 'Socrates is a man'? |
|
