Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jul 13, 2021 1:49:52 GMT
1. To argue through pure doubt alone results in something which cannot be doubted.
2. This absence of doubt is acceptance, doubt is rejection.
3. To argue through pure rejection alone results in something which cannot be rejected.
4. Acceptance is that which aligns within a filter of knowledge, rejection is that which does not align within a filter of knowledge.
5. The filter is accepted without doubt, what is not accepted is the knowledge which does not align with that filter.
6. That which cannot be doubted acts as a filter and it filters further knowledge which may in turn act as a further filter.
7. Knowledge is that which aligns with further knowledge, it is the filter which filters further filters.
8. This cannot be doubted as to doubt it would be to use this same argument, as knowledge, as a filter.
2. This absence of doubt is acceptance, doubt is rejection.
3. To argue through pure rejection alone results in something which cannot be rejected.
4. Acceptance is that which aligns within a filter of knowledge, rejection is that which does not align within a filter of knowledge.
5. The filter is accepted without doubt, what is not accepted is the knowledge which does not align with that filter.
6. That which cannot be doubted acts as a filter and it filters further knowledge which may in turn act as a further filter.
7. Knowledge is that which aligns with further knowledge, it is the filter which filters further filters.
8. This cannot be doubted as to doubt it would be to use this same argument, as knowledge, as a filter.