Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on Jul 11, 2021 3:38:31 GMT
So, there is a primary datum in being which configures the notion. The abstract being give field to the concrete existence, as a effort of intelligence to surpass the physical negativity of life.
In ontotranscendence, we can think about some ilations in the modum of the primum being. The primum datum of conscience is the being in his relativity.
So, we can configure being as ontotranscendental.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 11, 2021 7:17:15 GMT
But how any abstract thing allows to transform itself into material things? If you're talking about not this aspect, but about changing the abstract to non-abstract, then what does it mean the abstract exists before non-abstract?
I take anything abstract as a generalisation of any given things, and unlike their material aspect, those generalized deities can be called the abstractions. That's why these abstractions don't contradict to the material things, because the abstractions are just names for it, and nothing more. And names don't contradict to the matter, they are also material as mechanical waves.
|
|
Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on Jul 13, 2021 0:50:00 GMT
Not abstract but concrete and immanent. But is apreensible what you say, but not conclusive.
I am reading a lot of Wittgeinstein. Finished the bluebook. Mean a lot to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 14, 2021 3:02:26 GMT
Not abstract but concrete and immanent. But is apreensible what you say, but not conclusive. I am reading a lot of Wittgeinstein. Finished the bluebook. Mean a lot to me. One can expand one's vocabulary by inventing new words, new sounds. Unlike the notions, which might be existing a priori in us, inventing new words is close to not the expanding, but an illusion of the expand. Why am I talking about this? I think that adding something concrete to an abstract is close to your life, to the difficulties of it. And in less it concerns to just inventing new words making them be more "concrete". Briefly, the life itself make one's abstract views more concrete. No, I haven't read that book, but I have as brown so blue books. I started reading brown, and passed ~10 pages. Mostly he writes by short phrases, thoughts. But unlike many others philosophers, his style and a deep of thoughts is much more clear and more brilliant, than of those whose absolutely unreadable mesh of words can be found here or there |
|
Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on Jul 16, 2021 13:08:05 GMT
Not abstract but concrete and immanent. But is apreensible what you say, but not conclusive. I am reading a lot of Wittgeinstein. Finished the bluebook. Mean a lot to me. One can expand one's vocabulary by inventing new words, new sounds. Unlike the notions, which might be existing a priori in us, inventing new words is close to not the expanding, but an illusion of the expand. Why am I talking about this? I think that adding something concrete to an abstract is close to your life, to the difficulties of it. And in less it concerns to just inventing new words making them be more "concrete". Briefly, the life itself make one's abstract views more concrete. No, I haven't read that book, but I have as brown so blue books. I started reading brown, and passed ~10 pages. Mostly he writes by short phrases, thoughts. But unlike many others philosophers, his style and a deep of thoughts is much more clear and more brilliant, than of those whose absolutely unreadable mesh of words can be found here or there True! |
|
