|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jun 15, 2021 22:16:35 GMT
A 1d point exists as pure form direct towards itself and through itself as a singular entity.
The 0d point stands in contrast to this 1d point as pure void. This void seperates the 1d point into further points which all relate through eachother regardless of distance.
A 1d point equals another 1d point thus all 1d points are the same point that acts through itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by kyloscythe91 on Jun 16, 2021 5:58:33 GMT
do you mean like true truth trajectories from starting points philosophically speaking. i'm sorry, i'm still growing as a philosopher. and what does this void mean? the higher mysteries of nothing? just trying my best here.  . |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jun 16, 2021 6:13:37 GMT
How does 0d point exist though?
|
|
antor
Junior Member
Posts: 87
Likes: 51
Country: Sweden
Politics: Middle Left something
Religion: Apatheist
Age: 35
|
Post by antor on Jun 16, 2021 13:13:32 GMT
With points it's not relevant to talk about dimensionality, they are the same regardless of dimensionality. No extension in any direction.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jun 21, 2021 19:36:07 GMT
With points it's not relevant to talk about dimensionality, they are the same regardless of dimensionality. No extension in any direction. Pure direction as in directed through itself as itself in all directions, inner and outer, horizontally and vertically necessitates a single point. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jun 21, 2021 19:37:19 GMT
How does 0d point exist though? A 0d point is a gap where one thing differentiates into another. A 0d point is the observation of multiplicity. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jun 21, 2021 19:37:59 GMT
do you mean like true truth trajectories from starting points philosophically speaking. i'm sorry, i'm still growing as a philosopher. and what does this void mean? the higher mysteries of nothing? just trying my best here. . See above. |
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Jun 22, 2021 15:49:49 GMT
With points it's not relevant to talk about dimensionality, they are the same regardless of dimensionality. No extension in any direction. That's exactly what I have against the quack-science idea that time is a dimension; it has no extension. It's as if the linear dimension when driving from New York to Boston meant that the road appeared only when and where you drove on it and disappeared as soon as you touched the next spot in the road. Time is no more a dimension than color is. This Postmodern decadent idea leads to fantasies about time travel and almost-infinite time lines in parallel universes. Hollywood makes a lot of money off these lies, plus such brain-warping escapism keeps dangerous geniuses from thinking about reality and threatening the ruling class. The real fourth dimension is spatial and we are connected to it at the interface with the universe everything in our universe originated from. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jun 23, 2021 16:46:25 GMT
With points it's not relevant to talk about dimensionality, they are the same regardless of dimensionality. No extension in any direction. That's exactly what I have against the quack-science idea that time is a dimension; it has no extension. It's as if the linear dimension when driving from New York to Boston meant that the road appeared only when and where you drove on it and disappeared as soon as you touched the next spot in the road. Time is no more a dimension than color is. This Postmodern decadent idea leads to fantasies about time travel and almost-infinite time lines in parallel universes. Hollywood makes a lot of money off these lies, plus such brain-warping escapism keeps dangerous geniuses from thinking about reality and threatening the ruling class. The real fourth dimension is spatial and we are connected to it at the interface with the universe everything in our universe originated from. Time is space existing through space. One space reflects into another space with the space between them being a space. |
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Jun 24, 2021 18:43:18 GMT
Narcotic Mind-Candy That's exactly what I have against the quack-science idea that time is a dimension; it has no extension. It's as if the linear dimension when driving from New York to Boston meant that the road appeared only when and where you drove on it and disappeared as soon as you touched the next spot in the road. Time is no more a dimension than color is. This Postmodern decadent idea leads to fantasies about time travel and almost-infinite time lines in parallel universes. Hollywood makes a lot of money off these lies, plus such brain-warping escapism keeps dangerous geniuses from thinking about reality and threatening the ruling class. The real fourth dimension is spatial and we are connected to it at the interface with the universe everything in our universe originated from. Time is space existing through space. One space reflects into another space with the space between them being a space. That is the kind of rationalizing gibberish we get in theology: God being three persons in one, etc. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jun 28, 2021 17:29:58 GMT
Time is space existing through space. One space reflects into another space with the space between them being a space. That is the kind of rationalizing gibberish we get in theology: God being three persons in one, etc. False. Water takes on three natures of solid, liquid and gas. One phenomenon can exist through multiple states. |
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Jun 28, 2021 18:36:45 GMT
Physics Has Become a Superstition That is the kind of rationalizing gibberish we get in theology: God being three persons in one, etc. False. Water takes on three natures of solid, liquid and gas. One phenomenon can exist through multiple states. The Trinity is not a series of states, or a revolving choice among states. Thinking that water can be solid, liquid, and gas all at the same time in the same condition is what Trinity or Postclassical Physics gibberish is like. There's no reason, except the neurotic desire of physicists to be weird, that the quantum leap can't take place into, through, and back from a higher dimension. That's what all other leaps do, going from a to b without traveling on the line ab. Instead, they go through c, the dimension of height. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jun 28, 2021 18:45:37 GMT
False. Water takes on three natures of solid, liquid and gas. One phenomenon can exist through multiple states. The Trinity is not a series of states, or a revolving choice among states. Thinking that water can be solid, liquid, and gas all at the same time in the same condition is what Trinity or Postclassical Physics gibberish is like. There's no reason, except the neurotic desire of physicists to be weird, that the quantum leap can't take place into, through, and back from a higher dimension. That's what all other leaps do, going from a to b without traveling on the line ab. Instead, they go through c, the dimension of height. Ice melting and evaporating is the observance of water in three states at once....face palm. |
|
|
|
1d Point
Jun 29, 2021 18:14:08 GMT
via mobile
Post by MAYA-EL on Jun 29, 2021 18:14:08 GMT
How does 0d point exist though? Omg you must be new?. Make a pot of coffee make sure you got your comfy clothes on and prepare for the nonsensical waves of replies |
|
|
|
1d Point
Jun 29, 2021 18:19:11 GMT
via mobile
Post by MAYA-EL on Jun 29, 2021 18:19:11 GMT
The Trinity isn't really a transition phase like melting ice it's more of a oxymoron state of being because he supposedly completely died yet was not dead and was the all creator yet was not the all creator These are bipolar opposites that cannot be observed like melting ice because melting ice is a phase transfer not a bipolar opposite
|
|
.
