|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 11, 2021 20:12:59 GMT
1. Void voids itself as there is no nothing. To say nothing is to say something thus there is no nothing.
2. This voiding of void results in a contradiction given being results from nothing as there is only being.
3. This voiding of void results in the totality of being as unified in the respect being exists under itself as being as only being.
4. This unified being in turn is voided given void does not even exist through time and space as it is indefinite. The voiding of void is continuous as being in its totality is continuous thus this continuous being is voided.
5. This voiding of a continous being results in multiple beings which are continuous as this continuity of being mirrors its source. One being results in multiple beings with the continuity of the one being occuring through the continuity of multiple beings.
6. Void voids void as being and this being is voided into further being. Being is thus grounded in the opposition of void against void and the opposition of being and void. Being is grounded in contradiction and this contradiction is grounded in void.
7. Being is the contradiction of void.
|
|
antor
Junior Member
Posts: 87
Likes: 51
Country: Sweden
Politics: Middle Left something
Religion: Apatheist
Age: 35
|
Post by antor on May 12, 2021 12:37:11 GMT
You're going too fast or you're taking too many substances. If thought has only the meaning of reaching a conclusion about something then it's not genuinely rooted in everything that it needs.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on May 14, 2021 4:19:06 GMT
Yet you still fail to explain to me why you came to the conclusion that one thing automatically means everything and everything is just an expression of one thing you have yet to tell me why that is the conclusion you came to. Which granted I realize it's not even your conclusion you just adopted that conclusion based off of Eastern philosophy but not everybody can be original I understand that however what's your excuse/reason as to why that's your conclusion? Because logically it's not there.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 17, 2021 16:17:44 GMT
Yet you still fail to explain to me why you came to the conclusion that one thing automatically means everything and everything is just an expression of one thing you have yet to tell me why that is the conclusion you came to. Which granted I realize it's not even your conclusion you just adopted that conclusion based off of Eastern philosophy but not everybody can be original I understand that however what's your excuse/reason as to why that's your conclusion? Because logically it's not there. The many beings are summated under one being as only being exists. To speak of void is to speak of contradiction as there is no void. Dually "all is one" is founded in western philosophy and religion as well.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 17, 2021 16:18:39 GMT
You're going too fast or you're taking too many substances. If thought has only the meaning of reaching a conclusion about something then it's not genuinely rooted in everything that it needs. I don't understand what you mean.
|
|