Post by Eugene 2.0 on Apr 16, 2021 8:59:56 GMT
Usually we might say that "x is y", or "x determines by y", or "y is what makes x to be x". Briefly, a thing has only one essence to be determined. I protest about it, because my opinion is that 'we can't proclaim that a certain x as a certain thing must be determined by one thing y', or that 'there's no necessity for x to be what it is by some one thing y'.
Hence, x might be x just if it has more, than one identifier. Note that I use determiners, essence, and identifier as synonyms mostly; it's because I'm not gonna concentrate on these variations now. My point is in non-mono valued characteristics of things.
Another concept or an idea I'd like to present is that a human being might has two gaps or two essences /I take the gaps and the essences here as determiners, identifiers, and et cetera./ In turn, those gaps or essences might be:
for a man = a woman side + a child side
for a woman = a man side + a child side
for a child = a man side + a woman side
Perhaps, there are many other conceptualizations, yet I sympathy to this one. And I won't insist on that a family human being has only two essences, and those essences are like I've written above; but I will insist on a thing as more, than one-valued object.
Hence, x might be x just if it has more, than one identifier. Note that I use determiners, essence, and identifier as synonyms mostly; it's because I'm not gonna concentrate on these variations now. My point is in non-mono valued characteristics of things.
Another concept or an idea I'd like to present is that a human being might has two gaps or two essences /I take the gaps and the essences here as determiners, identifiers, and et cetera./ In turn, those gaps or essences might be:
for a man = a woman side + a child side
for a woman = a man side + a child side
for a child = a man side + a woman side
Perhaps, there are many other conceptualizations, yet I sympathy to this one. And I won't insist on that a family human being has only two essences, and those essences are like I've written above; but I will insist on a thing as more, than one-valued object.