Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 31, 2021 8:03:00 GMT
Indeed, anthropocentrism is optional for the most explainable version of how things do without a person or an observer. Things could be something different with no observers, while to claim it is beyond any human privilege access to the reality.
Things can live by their own with their private relations, and with only their kinds or types of interaction (if there are any). So we shouldn't dare to prescribe what things are and how they act for all the time.
Things can live by their own with their private relations, and with only their kinds or types of interaction (if there are any). So we shouldn't dare to prescribe what things are and how they act for all the time.
