|
|
Post by jonbain on Apr 3, 2021 18:42:51 GMT
If you want to understand Jung, first thing to do is
forget that other guy. He twists Jung so bad he has
become Jung's shadow himself..
|
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Apr 11, 2021 16:15:18 GMT
so who got deleted to make the thread a bit more mystical?
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP 
Elder
Posts: 2,719 
Likes: 1,762
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 31
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Apr 11, 2021 23:43:36 GMT
If you want to understand Jung, first thing to do is forget that other guy. He twists Jung so bad he has become Jung's shadow himself.. You talking about Jordan Peterson? |
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Apr 12, 2021 21:19:19 GMT
If you want to understand Jung, first thing to do is forget that other guy. He twists Jung so bad he has become Jung's shadow himself.. Upon reading this, I immediately thought of Freud as "the other guy", but I do not understand exactly how or why Freud would become Jung's shadow; perhaps you can be a bit more specific. My own knowledge of the two guys is practically summarized on this site: www.harleytherapy.co.uk/councelling/freud-vs-jung-similarities-differences.htm Incidentally, I was surprised by your spelling "junguian"; I have seen the plain "jungian. However, to preserve the G-sound as in Go/GHent, I'd like to use "Junghian". |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Apr 15, 2021 12:28:27 GMT
If you want to understand Jung, first thing to do is forget that other guy. He twists Jung so bad he has become Jung's shadow himself.. You talking about Jordan Peterson? trying desperately not, but yes, that was what the deleted opening post was talking about he makes my skin crawl, after graduating with hons in psych and getting a distinction for the Jung course
|
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Apr 15, 2021 12:30:41 GMT
If you want to understand Jung, first thing to do is forget that other guy. He twists Jung so bad he has become Jung's shadow himself.. Upon reading this, I immediately thought of Freud as "the other guy", but I do not understand exactly how or why Freud would become Jung's shadow; perhaps you can be a bit more specific. My own knowledge of the two guys is practically summarized on this site: www.harleytherapy.co.uk/councelling/freud-vs-jung-similarities-differences.htm Incidentally, I was surprised by your spelling "junguian"; I have seen the plain "jungian. However, to preserve the G-sound as in Go/GHent, I'd like to use "Junghian". The opening post with that spelling was made by someone who got deleted. He was talking about a guy whose name i will not type because then youtube will spam me with all his quackery. See posts above for details. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Apr 15, 2021 13:10:50 GMT
I like many Jungean theories, and I like this guy who uses them in practice:
|
|
