|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2021 14:02:00 GMT
So, beyond Time there is a God. And that God creates everything that lives and moves. God is Structure.
Human beings creates a god which they name God. But these god is human.
Because of god, man strive for power. Because of God, they rest in peace.
(A little philosophical poem.)
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2021 14:09:48 GMT
It's more adequate to name that "The Structure".
|
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Mar 20, 2021 3:23:25 GMT
You mean Beyond change? because time is a human concept
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 23, 2021 13:55:32 GMT
A human can get the truth about something beyond via transcendental logic and dialectics as Kant wrote. Spatial & timely bases are what at the edge of our all knowledge. However, Lobachevsky's and Riemann's spatial theories collapsed Kantian space and Einstein's theory made the time theory less trustworthy.
All transcendental methods can be interpreted as a part of modal logic, but it gives almost nothing except for consistency of a given transcendental theory.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Mar 30, 2021 13:30:46 GMT
A human can get the truth about something beyond via transcendental logic and dialectics as Kant wrote. Spatial & timely bases are what at the edge of our all knowledge. However, Lobachevsky's and Riemann's spatial theories collapsed Kantian space and Einstein's theory made the time theory less trustworthy. All transcendental methods can be interpreted as a part of modal logic, but it gives almost nothing except for consistency of a given transcendental theory. The only thing Einstein proved is how gullible, corrupt and unthinking people are.
Any concept of space that is not based intrinsically on fundamental Euclidean geometry is just willful ignorance for the sake of emotional neuroses at the core of the collapse of western capitalist fascism.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 30, 2021 13:56:46 GMT
A human can get the truth about something beyond via transcendental logic and dialectics as Kant wrote. Spatial & timely bases are what at the edge of our all knowledge. However, Lobachevsky's and Riemann's spatial theories collapsed Kantian space and Einstein's theory made the time theory less trustworthy. All transcendental methods can be interpreted as a part of modal logic, but it gives almost nothing except for consistency of a given transcendental theory. The only thing Einstein proved is how gullible, corrupt and unthinking people are.
Any concept of space that is not based intrinsically on fundamental Euclidean geometry is just willful ignorance for the sake of emotional neuroses at the core of the collapse of western capitalist fascism.
How would you characterize the most correct astrophysicist representation of the cosmos in metaphysical sense, i.e. in being-sense like monism, pluralism, dualism, etc? Which one is more suitable or more closer to the truth? |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Mar 30, 2021 14:21:10 GMT
The only thing Einstein proved is how gullible, corrupt and unthinking people are.
Any concept of space that is not based intrinsically on fundamental Euclidean geometry is just willful ignorance for the sake of emotional neuroses at the core of the collapse of western capitalist fascism.
How would you characterize the most correct astrophysicist representation of the cosmos in metaphysical sense, i.e. in being-sense like monism, pluralism, dualism, etc? Which one is more suitable or more closer to the truth? There will always be a paradox in the arguments for and against monism and dualism. But this itself demonstrates the essential dualist nature of the universe. Of course monism over-arches all, but in an entirely monist cosmos we would have no paradoxes, contradictions, nor dualities, nor even dualist arguments. So we have to be satisfied with the paradox that the cosmos is singular whole, but our existence in this physical universe is fundamentally dualist in nature. The essential causes at the core of our inner being are beyond this universe. We are in contradiction to the physical world. The mind is NOT the body. This has been proved beyond doubt in this article of mine: www.flight-light-and-spin.com/chapter/pandora-2.htmEssentially real philosophy has not progressed since Newton. In one sense, it cannot, other than by first regressing to the sophistry of the unthinking Einstein mob of perversion. |
|
