|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 16:21:08 GMT
So, philosophy is a art of creation. His hole is to create, meaning, ideas, things, and is the mother of technology, as we know.
It's not a exact science but give birth to a exact activity: technology.
So, scientifical "errors" in philosophy is natural. Because he gives birth to the new.
Science and Religion itself have used the thought of great philosophers to increment scientifical activity and religious practices.
So, philosophy is of a great value, if we are talking about scientifical practices, discoveries, and activities, and technological speaking, it's essential.
In religion, he gives birth to exegesis of religious texts. So, great use.
So, philosophy cannot be classified as utile, but can be utile for science and religion.
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 17:34:17 GMT
Philosophy is not dependent of science, but can use science to create. In the same manner, science depends not of philosophy, but can use philosophy to see the utility.
|
|
Sonny
Full Member
Posts: 248 
Likes: 84
Ancestry: European
Religion: Christian
|
Post by Sonny on Mar 18, 2021 18:25:33 GMT
Science is an approximation. Some even call science an art of approximation. I take back what I had said earlier.. the scientific method is not philosophy, the scientific method is a social construct. Yes, it's useful. Its not precise. Technology can mean many things. Technologies are artificial constructs. They can mean various machines and machinery but I've also seen more mundane examples such as chairs and tables referred to as technology. It depends on your personal definition, but not all technology or machinery requires the use of the scientific method for its creation. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 18, 2021 19:22:32 GMT
I don't really care about as science so the art or the creation, because I do not really now what a human is? What and who am I?
Some says that "you're an animal", some says "you're a living being", some says "you're a monster", and some says "you're a cute!", and so on.
Years ago I love one things, now I love some other things, so which one is me? What do I like: both of those things or just one of those?
And I guess that all of these: science, art, creativity, make-up, sports, love, hatred, consciousness - all of those and more are tools. I'm not sure that each person must have one of it. Maybe all of us from some Planet R and that planet is a half-dreamy colorful, beaufitul and painless place. This place is really nice and cosy; it's a place where birds are singing their pretty songs all the time, and the Sun is shining well... Or maybe we're dots; just simple dots as in geometry. Who knows? I don't know anything for certain, so I'd like to see any methods as just tools. Only tools, no more.
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 20:10:07 GMT
Living beings are living structures. There is nothing to think beyond that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 18, 2021 20:50:08 GMT
Living beings are living structures. There is nothing to think beyond that. Oh, no. For me a person is a mystery. Or, as you said once day - the enigma; the enigmatic deity. All I try to avoid is to plain a person to some primates. Even not get aside a view that all the people have come from apes, and even believing in the evolution - I just can't put a person to some mechanical or plained organical deity. That's why even a tiniest and a smaller cell is something alive and something beautiful. At the same time I don't like many creatures like worms or snakes - I am afraid of them... ooohhh.... creeeepyyy... So, for me a person is something decent no matter what. And then each time meeting another person who seems to be unchangeable and too selfish to become more softy and more kind - becomes a really desperate case. And I ask myself - what can I do to get people along with each other? How to make them friends, not foes? What can be done to diminish hatred and evil in the world? How to make people happier? |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 20:53:39 GMT
It's nice to see a dog as a living structure, a structure that lives.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 18, 2021 21:03:24 GMT
It's nice to see a dog as a living structure, a structure that lives. Why do you mean by the "structure"? What is it? |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 22:02:19 GMT
What is a structure? Science by himself can answer that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 18, 2021 22:18:37 GMT
What is a structure? Science by himself can answer that? What do you mean, not science. I said about a structured dog, didn't you? |
|
