Form and Essence in Dogmatic Religions

A prophet can make a religion, but a religion cannot make a prophet. It's necessary the will of God that transcends the logic of religion.

In the same manner, people can make religion better, but if a religion cannot make people better, one more time, there are no religion at all.

The true religion is eternally open to prophecy and the transcendental communication with the will of God.

And also, there are a bettering of people that not mantain people in a kind of dogma prison, that cuts out the essence and the spontaneity of the heart of the fisrt prophet.

It's a very simple thing, but the atmosphere of "old" religions do not make true and spontaneous things grown.

I feel really a profound sorrow for people who lose happiness and joy obeying irrational and arbitrary dogmas.

Obeying human irrationality because of a profound sentiment of fear...

It's a tragedy! And we can solve with simplicity of heart that questions. Only the true religion can make things really better, without losing sight of our transcendental mind.

It's deep... For sure, a religion isn't a combine or a factory of prothets. People are expecting priests will become saints, but they're wrong about it, because the priests are just lambs of God, their role repeat role of the ancient Jews rabbi's, practice.

Well, unfortunatelly the catholicism and others religions do not give what they promisse. But best is the way than the final goal. I understand that there are much richness in the orthodox religions, but there are so much simplicity and grown in the more "excluded" of the majoritary creed.

In everything we live we always have a choice to make: or mantain a standard, or grown and abandon that creed or group of ideias. Same for orthodox religions.

Sure.