Thought as an Atribute of Feeling

I talked to a woman who wrote instead of cogito ergo sum feeling ergo sum. I asked why? She said almost the same your post presents. 

I guess it seems to be true. But what's my point of this? I guess if to compare our thoughts to logic, so we cannot avoid to use feelings at least once, because to achieve a result, or to make an inference we have to draw a line somewhere to say where is that result or an inference is. It can be said in a different way: if not to put a dot (a point) at the end of the sentence, and never do any nodding, or pauses in talks, we never know where to stop, and where is our thought ended. Indeed, if I stop to put dots and any other signs and start to type as like it is nothing, but a wall draws, it becomes problematic to understand where is one part, and where is another one.

Those 'pauses' are the same as our physiological exhales. So, if logic subordinates our physiology, and the last one subordinates to feelings, then, taking into account that logic is what resembles to our thoughts, it is impossible to think not using any feelings during the process.

I'll be glad to know what other routes we've got, and does everyone have them? Were you talking about some spiritual or intuitive forms of cognitive system in a human nature/body?

Well, perhaps my questions might appear as non-serious or naïve, but it's just because of – as you've already said – language barriers, and because of my arrogance in some or maybe all knowledge about knowledge.

The ancient Greek is considered as the visit card of a professional philosopher. Unfortunately I don't know it good. Instead, I wanted to direct in logic, that's why I half-banned the ancient Greek classes.

Many philosophers would agree the ancient Greek is as the one of such languages you've mentioned.