Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2021 20:30:43 GMT
There is a proeminence in being that shows to us the final causal relation on this reciprocity.
But there is a true natural being, and not so true, that mankind considers "false".
If we realizes the concept of being, if that is possible, virtual beingness will be actual beingness.
But there is the problem of the virtual, there is no force in virtuality (only in his negation).
We need, to achieve being, to free ourselves of the concept that says to us that virtuality is force, and not causal possibilities on beingness.
It is the problem of the separation, of the not so good distinction of good and evil, or not so good in my concept.
But there is a true natural being, and not so true, that mankind considers "false".
If we realizes the concept of being, if that is possible, virtual beingness will be actual beingness.
But there is the problem of the virtual, there is no force in virtuality (only in his negation).
We need, to achieve being, to free ourselves of the concept that says to us that virtuality is force, and not causal possibilities on beingness.
It is the problem of the separation, of the not so good distinction of good and evil, or not so good in my concept.
