|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 9, 2020 21:09:56 GMT
Contrast necessitates a continual divergence of forms. Contrast comes from a center point of Nothingness thus is twofold. One form in contrast to another not only necessitates form as contrasting to another form but form as contrasting to Nothingness.
This can be observed within the contrast of a bird against a tree and that of Nothingness. In observing the fundamental forme of the bird and the tree a curvature of the phenomena, as in the curves which forms the phenomena, exists as the means of distinction between the bird and the tree. These curves which contrast the phenomena are fundamentally empty in themselves except through further curvature.
Dually the birds existing in contrast to Nothingness is a series of curves which are composed of further curves given the bird, as a singular entity within the contrasting void, is composed of further parts. The distinction occurs through the curvature from which the phenomena are composed.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 29, 2020 3:45:35 GMT
Let me give you an example. It's like somebody asking a racecar driver to teach them how to win a Formula 1 races and the Formula 1 racer says vit's easy he grabbed the steering wheel and you drive" See how that was a little vague and didn't really get the person any closer to winning a successful race? But those are the fundamentals and without fundamentals the knowledge is dead.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 29, 2020 4:21:41 GMT
How so?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 29, 2020 17:31:24 GMT
Fundamentals are the basic truths, axioms which are assumed, that knowledge is built upon.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 31, 2020 3:25:52 GMT
Regardless if that's the case or not can you not see how I'm wanting you to move past the basics? And actually systematically apply your method walking somebody through it to show that it's not just a mental fairytale but an actual experiential phenomenon? that other people can do and through said steps (in detail) that a person can experience AND come to the same conclusions that you have?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jan 2, 2021 19:03:55 GMT
Regardless if that's the case or not can you not see how I'm wanting you to move past the basics? And actually systematically apply your method walking somebody through it to show that it's not just a mental fairytale but an actual experiential phenomenon? that other people can do and through said steps (in detail) that a person can experience AND come to the same conclusions that you have? Pay attention to a thought. See what is behind it, another thought. See what is behind the train of thoughts, you can't, nothing is there. Pay attention to a cup half full of water, half of air. Pay mind to the line between the two. Upon closer inspection nothing is there. The system is strictly perpetual analysis.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Jan 3, 2021 8:02:03 GMT
Regardless if that's the case or not can you not see how I'm wanting you to move past the basics? And actually systematically apply your method walking somebody through it to show that it's not just a mental fairytale but an actual experiential phenomenon? that other people can do and through said steps (in detail) that a person can experience AND come to the same conclusions that you have? Pay attention to a thought. See what is behind it, another thought. See what is behind the train of thoughts, you can't, nothing is there. Pay attention to a cup half full of water, half of air. Pay mind to the line between the two. Upon closer inspection nothing is there. The system is strictly perpetual analysis. Yet not everyone comes to the same conclusion as you
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jan 4, 2021 22:11:52 GMT
Pay attention to a thought. See what is behind it, another thought. See what is behind the train of thoughts, you can't, nothing is there. Pay attention to a cup half full of water, half of air. Pay mind to the line between the two. Upon closer inspection nothing is there. The system is strictly perpetual analysis. Yet not everyone comes to the same conclusion as you Then What Is The Line?
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Jan 5, 2021 8:58:22 GMT
What "line"? Do you mean the line you keep asserting is between things like the bird and tree or the cup and what's in it? Is that the line you are refering to?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jan 7, 2021 3:44:34 GMT
What "line"? Do you mean the line you keep asserting is between things like the bird and tree or the cup and what's in it? Is that the line you are refering to? The line which occurs between a cup half full of air and half full of water.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Jan 7, 2021 22:46:15 GMT
Ahh then my answer to your question is this
The line is a figment of your imagination Something that you created in order to make your explanations about life seem a little bit more "pretty" and flow better when explained in a rhetorical statement
But doesn't actually exist fundamentaly.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jan 9, 2021 3:57:17 GMT
Ahh then my answer to your question is this The line is a figment of your imagination Something that you created in order to make your explanations about life seem a little bit more "pretty" and flow better when explained in a rhetorical statement But doesn't actually exist fundamentaly. The horizon is a line/curve, the line is not a made up entity.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Jan 9, 2021 6:11:50 GMT
Fundamentally The Horizon does not have a line. Now I agree you do see a line that is only from your perspective where you're standing in the moment that line is not in the same spot anywhere else and depending on elevation it will usually appear to not have a line and fundamentally speaking you only see a line because of your limited eyesight and your physical location but there is not actually a line and even if there was that wouldn't prove your other statement to be correct
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jan 10, 2021 0:49:28 GMT
Fundamentally The Horizon does not have a line. Now I agree you do see a line that is only from your perspective where you're standing in the moment that line is not in the same spot anywhere else and depending on elevation it will usually appear to not have a line and fundamentally speaking you only see a line because of your limited eyesight and your physical location but there is not actually a line and even if there was that wouldn't prove your other statement to be correct A horizon always results in a line/curve even when dependent upon the angle of observation. Learn to use commas.
|
|