|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 9, 2020 21:09:56 GMT
Contrast necessitates a continual divergence of forms. Contrast comes from a center point of Nothingness thus is twofold. One form in contrast to another not only necessitates form as contrasting to another form but form as contrasting to Nothingness.
This can be observed within the contrast of a bird against a tree and that of Nothingness. In observing the fundamental forme of the bird and the tree a curvature of the phenomena, as in the curves which forms the phenomena, exists as the means of distinction between the bird and the tree. These curves which contrast the phenomena are fundamentally empty in themselves except through further curvature.
Dually the birds existing in contrast to Nothingness is a series of curves which are composed of further curves given the bird, as a singular entity within the contrasting void, is composed of further parts. The distinction occurs through the curvature from which the phenomena are composed.
|
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 17, 2020 22:13:26 GMT
What? No no it's not
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 18, 2020 3:59:25 GMT
And how did you observe this? |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 18, 2020 4:09:57 GMT
That's a pretty Broad question in this particular sense seeing as it's kind of a common information category I guess my answer would be science in general?
I'm not sure how to respond to that I mean I know you're just flipping my own words towards me to try to avoid answering the question but it doesn't really work the other way around in this particular instance
And I don't have to because I can just use logic to conclude that you continually assert philosophical claims that in no way can be demonstrated or even observed and are merely just fictions of your imagination that im still waiting for you to demonstrate how someone other then you can observe any of these unusual perspectives
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 18, 2020 16:28:34 GMT
That's a pretty Broad question in this particular sense seeing as it's kind of a common information category I guess my answer would be science in general? I'm not sure how to respond to that I mean I know you're just flipping my own words towards me to try to avoid answering the question but it doesn't really work the other way around in this particular instance And I don't have to because I can just use logic to conclude that you continually assert philosophical claims that in no way can be demonstrated or even observed and are merely just fictions of your imagination that im still waiting for you to demonstrate how someone other then you can observe any of these unusual perspectives Avoiding the question when it is flipped back to you? Yes. What and where does science define what this line is? If the line is not Nothingness, then what is it composed of? Answer that. In mathematics the line is composed of infinite 0d points as infinite lines seperated from eachother through the points. Void can be observed as the formlessness of the phenomenon. The line between the water and the air is the formlessness of the water and the air. It is where the water and air cease to be. |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 18, 2020 23:23:47 GMT
That's a pretty Broad question in this particular sense seeing as it's kind of a common information category I guess my answer would be science in general? I'm not sure how to respond to that I mean I know you're just flipping my own words towards me to try to avoid answering the question but it doesn't really work the other way around in this particular instance And I don't have to because I can just use logic to conclude that you continually assert philosophical claims that in no way can be demonstrated or even observed and are merely just fictions of your imagination that im still waiting for you to demonstrate how someone other then you can observe any of these unusual perspectives Avoiding the question when it is flipped back to you? Yes. What and where does science define what this line is? If the line is not Nothingness, then what is it composed of? Answer that. In mathematics the line is composed of infinite 0d points as infinite lines seperated from eachother through the points. Void can be observed as the formlessness of the phenomenon. The line between the water and the air is the formlessness of the water and the air. It is where the water and air cease to be. You're not going to Rabbit Trail by getting me to reinstate the rationality of scientific observation that's a waste of my time and everybody else's especially when you're the one that needs to rationalize your claims because if you can't demonstrate or show or tell somebody else how to experience what's inside your head then it's just a delusion in your head if they cannot be manifested in reality and that's the difference between knowledge and delusions so the burden of explanation is still on you. Which I find it ironic that you're holding tight to this nothingness when you're an Atomist Am I right? You believe that everything is made of atoms and those Atoms are fundamentally Made Of quarks and whatever type of random funky named particle science can come up with? |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 19, 2020 3:58:37 GMT
Avoiding the question when it is flipped back to you? Yes. What and where does science define what this line is? If the line is not Nothingness, then what is it composed of? Answer that. In mathematics the line is composed of infinite 0d points as infinite lines seperated from eachother through the points. Void can be observed as the formlessness of the phenomenon. The line between the water and the air is the formlessness of the water and the air. It is where the water and air cease to be. You're not going to Rabbit Trail by getting me to reinstate the rationality of scientific observation that's a waste of my time and everybody else's especially when you're the one that needs to rationalize your claims because if you can't demonstrate or show or tell somebody else how to experience what's inside your head then it's just a delusion in your head if they cannot be manifested in reality and that's the difference between knowledge and delusions so the burden of explanation is still on you. Which I find it ironic that you're holding tight to this nothingness when you're an Atomist Am I right? You believe that everything is made of atoms and those Atoms are fundamentally Made Of quarks and whatever type of random funky named particle science can come up with? I am not an atomist, but if the primary foundation of reality is particles these particles move through void given there is a formless gap which occurs between particles. They move through nothingness. If memory serves the ancient philosopher and atomist Lucretius observed reality as broken down to atoms and void. You have yet to respond to the question: what composes the line between water and air? |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 19, 2020 9:47:44 GMT
I will answer the question soon as you answer mine which has been asked several times
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 20, 2020 0:59:31 GMT
I will answer the question soon as you answer mine which has been asked several times I have answered it, upon closer analysis the line between water and air appears as fundamentally nothing. Analysis is the answer with analysis being the breaking down of phenomena into further phenomena. |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 20, 2020 19:37:20 GMT
How was the analysis done is what I'm asking
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 24, 2020 23:59:52 GMT
How was the analysis done is what I'm asking Keep breaking down relations until nothing is left. |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 25, 2020 15:27:17 GMT
How was the analysis done is what I'm asking Keep breaking down relations until nothing is left. Can you walk me through it ? So that i can understand exactly what you mean? |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 25, 2020 17:13:11 GMT
Keep breaking down relations until nothing is left. Can you walk me through it ? So that i can understand exactly what you mean? X is composed of y and z, y and z are composed of y1 and y2 and z is composed of z1 and z2. y1, y2, z1 and z2 cannot be broken down any further. They become the point zero, the empty point all phenomenon break down too with this emptiness being grounded in the phenomenon are the points of change from one phenomenon into another considering they cannot exist on their own terms except through further phenomenon. |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 26, 2020 4:56:30 GMT
You're telling me the conclusions you made and in what pattern but you're not telling me "how" you made those conclusions
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 26, 2020 17:18:56 GMT
You're telling me the conclusions you made and in what pattern but you're not telling me "how" you made those conclusions The pattern is how they are made as the pattern is the means. |
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 28, 2020 19:26:47 GMT
You're telling me the conclusions you made and in what pattern but you're not telling me "how" you made those conclusions The pattern is how they are made as the pattern is the means. Let me give you an example. It's like somebody asking a racecar driver to teach them how to win a Formula 1 races and the Formula 1 racer says vit's easy he grabbed the steering wheel and you drive" See how that was a little vague and didn't really get the person any closer to winning a successful race? |
|
