Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2020 16:10:59 GMT
As realitivity does, reciprocity makes. As done, as made.
Arguing about measure of things, that is the logical of senses.
Relativity do what we can make in history, personal inclusiveness in history in general.
So, we need substantial presences to asseverate our historical sense.
Resuming, we need the true about things to asseverate our historical sense.
If we lost the historical sense, we lost the sense of values.
If we lost the sense of values, we cannot create value.
It's a huge problem, but I think that value can be created in virtuous universalities, that can be attained in the process of relativity generating reciprocity, and logical causality (with some necessary arbitrary illations).
Arguing about measure of things, that is the logical of senses.
Relativity do what we can make in history, personal inclusiveness in history in general.
So, we need substantial presences to asseverate our historical sense.
Resuming, we need the true about things to asseverate our historical sense.
If we lost the historical sense, we lost the sense of values.
If we lost the sense of values, we cannot create value.
It's a huge problem, but I think that value can be created in virtuous universalities, that can be attained in the process of relativity generating reciprocity, and logical causality (with some necessary arbitrary illations).