johnbc
Full Member
Roman Catholic
Posts: 110
Likes: 63
Religion: Catholic
Philosophy: Anarcho-capitalist, Anti-communism
|
Post by johnbc on Dec 1, 2020 21:14:57 GMT
I. The Law of the Principle
Everything that is, has been or will be, had, has and will have a principle, and that is inevitable. The principle is in a sense the foundation of anything because it has its foundation in the principle.
II. The Law of Anteriority
The logos of anteriority, truly implies the priority from an antecedent to the consequent, necessarily implies the priority to another that is distinct from him, other than him, and that in a way is other than him, which is an evident truth.
The Law (Logos) of anteriority and posteriority is valid, even if there was no entity before or after another.
III. The Logos
Is included in the Logos everything that the Logos includes, and is from it excluded everything that excludes from it.
Nothingness, taken as a term, being emptied of any and all positivity, also has logos, the logos of emptying, emptiness, absence itself. What governs reason, which is the reason for nothing, is precisely the absence of anything. Even nothing itself ‘has’ a reason, a logos, a law; consequently, everything there is has a certain rationality, it must have that rationality.
Certain modern satanists say it is a scandal that this law occurs. Scandal would exist if it were not so; scandal would arise if the term it affirms, it does not affirm what it affirms, because then it would annihilate itself, because it affirms, and simultaneously repels what it affirms, it would be simultaneously annulling itself, because we could reduce it to two states, in which it would be proposing falsehood when it affirms, and it would be proposing falsehood when it denies. At the same time, it would be false, either when it affirms, because it simultaneously denies; either when it denies, because it simultaneously affirms. Then there would be scandal.
The law of logos is given, it imposes itself; it is what is put, what is affirmed, what affirms what it affirms, in a way that includes, is included, inclusive, in logos, everything that logos affirms, and excluded from it everything that it denies. Satanists do not accept the eternity of this law, because they are fighting against all affirmation, in defense of denial.
|
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Dec 2, 2020 0:02:47 GMT
Why do you think these are laws? And why do you think they are in effect?
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 3, 2020 4:35:31 GMT
I. The Law of the Principle
Everything that is, has been or will be, had, has and will have a principle, and that is inevitable. The principle is in a sense the foundation of anything because it has its foundation in the principle. II. The Law of Anteriority
The logos of anteriority, truly implies the priority from an antecedent to the consequent, necessarily implies the priority to another that is distinct from him, other than him, and that in a way is other than him, which is an evident truth. The Law (Logos) of anteriority and posteriority is valid, even if there was no entity before or after another. III. The Logos
Is included in the Logos everything that the Logos includes, and is from it excluded everything that excludes from it. Nothingness, taken as a term, being emptied of any and all positivity, also has logos, the logos of emptying, emptiness, absence itself. What governs reason, which is the reason for nothing, is precisely the absence of anything. Even nothing itself ‘has’ a reason, a logos, a law; consequently, everything there is has a certain rationality, it must have that rationality. Certain modern satanists say it is a scandal that this law occurs. Scandal would exist if it were not so; scandal would arise if the term it affirms, it does not affirm what it affirms, because then it would annihilate itself, because it affirms, and simultaneously repels what it affirms, it would be simultaneously annulling itself, because we could reduce it to two states, in which it would be proposing falsehood when it affirms, and it would be proposing falsehood when it denies. At the same time, it would be false, either when it affirms, because it simultaneously denies; either when it denies, because it simultaneously affirms. Then there would be scandal. The law of logos is given, it imposes itself; it is what is put, what is affirmed, what affirms what it affirms, in a way that includes, is included, inclusive, in logos, everything that logos affirms, and excluded from it everything that it denies. Satanists do not accept the eternity of this law, because they are fighting against all affirmation, in defense of denial. 1. All phenomena are empty in themselves. 2. All phenomena are inherent middles to some further phenomena. 3. All phenomena as both empty and inherent middles are loops through a progressive self referentiality, thus are contexts in which both one and many phenomena manifest simultaneously. |
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Dec 4, 2020 3:35:23 GMT
I. The Law of the Principle
Everything that is, has been or will be, had, has and will have a principle, and that is inevitable. The principle is in a sense the foundation of anything because it has its foundation in the principle. II. The Law of Anteriority
The logos of anteriority, truly implies the priority from an antecedent to the consequent, necessarily implies the priority to another that is distinct from him, other than him, and that in a way is other than him, which is an evident truth. The Law (Logos) of anteriority and posteriority is valid, even if there was no entity before or after another. III. The Logos
Is included in the Logos everything that the Logos includes, and is from it excluded everything that excludes from it. Nothingness, taken as a term, being emptied of any and all positivity, also has logos, the logos of emptying, emptiness, absence itself. What governs reason, which is the reason for nothing, is precisely the absence of anything. Even nothing itself ‘has’ a reason, a logos, a law; consequently, everything there is has a certain rationality, it must have that rationality. Certain modern satanists say it is a scandal that this law occurs. Scandal would exist if it were not so; scandal would arise if the term it affirms, it does not affirm what it affirms, because then it would annihilate itself, because it affirms, and simultaneously repels what it affirms, it would be simultaneously annulling itself, because we could reduce it to two states, in which it would be proposing falsehood when it affirms, and it would be proposing falsehood when it denies. At the same time, it would be false, either when it affirms, because it simultaneously denies; either when it denies, because it simultaneously affirms. Then there would be scandal. The law of logos is given, it imposes itself; it is what is put, what is affirmed, what affirms what it affirms, in a way that includes, is included, inclusive, in logos, everything that logos affirms, and excluded from it everything that it denies. Satanists do not accept the eternity of this law, because they are fighting against all affirmation, in defense of denial. It seems to me that all of your laws are variations of one fundamental law, the law of identity: Anything is what it is, or "anything = itself". Like any other tautology, this is a necessary truth which, however, does not say anything about anything. Implied: ["anything = itself" = "itself"] This is self-evidently true but I contest it, because they are numerically different. Similarly, in "2 =2", the first 2 is not the second 2. This could be so, if and only if there were one 2. Evidence: The two apples in this basket are NOT the two apples in that basket. Similarity does not imply identity, except for primitive minds: If they killed a lion and then they saw a lion coming toward them, they believed that the former lion returned. Recurring storms were considered one storm (or "god" that returned), "The immortals" were things that were either permanently present or things (of the same kind) that re-appeared. The humans who saught immortality wished to imitate nature, for periodically, plants and flowers bloom, that is, RETURN. (The belief in re-incarnation ultimately rests, too, on the identification of similar things.)
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Dec 4, 2020 4:35:44 GMT
I. The Law of the Principle
Everything that is, has been or will be, had, has and will have a principle, and that is inevitable. The principle is in a sense the foundation of anything because it has its foundation in the principle. II. The Law of Anteriority
The logos of anteriority, truly implies the priority from an antecedent to the consequent, necessarily implies the priority to another that is distinct from him, other than him, and that in a way is other than him, which is an evident truth. The Law (Logos) of anteriority and posteriority is valid, even if there was no entity before or after another. III. The Logos
Is included in the Logos everything that the Logos includes, and is from it excluded everything that excludes from it. Nothingness, taken as a term, being emptied of any and all positivity, also has logos, the logos of emptying, emptiness, absence itself. What governs reason, which is the reason for nothing, is precisely the absence of anything. Even nothing itself ‘has’ a reason, a logos, a law; consequently, everything there is has a certain rationality, it must have that rationality. Certain modern satanists say it is a scandal that this law occurs. Scandal would exist if it were not so; scandal would arise if the term it affirms, it does not affirm what it affirms, because then it would annihilate itself, because it affirms, and simultaneously repels what it affirms, it would be simultaneously annulling itself, because we could reduce it to two states, in which it would be proposing falsehood when it affirms, and it would be proposing falsehood when it denies. At the same time, it would be false, either when it affirms, because it simultaneously denies; either when it denies, because it simultaneously affirms. Then there would be scandal. The law of logos is given, it imposes itself; it is what is put, what is affirmed, what affirms what it affirms, in a way that includes, is included, inclusive, in logos, everything that logos affirms, and excluded from it everything that it denies. Satanists do not accept the eternity of this law, because they are fighting against all affirmation, in defense of denial. It seems to me that all of your laws are variations of one fundamental law, the law of identity: Anything is what it is, or "anything = itself". Like any other tautology, this is a necessary truth which, however, does not say anything about anything. Implied: ["anything = itself" = "itself"] This is self-evidently true but I contest it, because they are numerically different. Similarly, in "2 =2", the first 2 is not the second 2. This could be so, if and only if there were one 2. Evidence: The two apples in this basket are NOT the two apples in that basket. Similarity does not imply identity, except for primitive minds: If they killed a lion and then they saw a lion coming toward them, they believed that the former lion returned. Recurring storms were considered one storm (or "god" that returned), "The immortals" were things that were either permanently present or things (of the same kind) that re-appeared. The humans who saught immortality wished to imitate nature, for periodically, plants and flowers bloom, that is, RETURN. (The belief in re-incarnation ultimately rests, too, on the identification of similar things.)
Similarity is the repetition of underlying forms. |
|
