The Great Schism between Catholic and Orthodox Church

{correction in my above post: The mother of Constantine was Helena; Theodora was the wife of Justinian.}
I am not sure as to what precipitated the great Schism that resulted into the papal Catholic Church and the patriarchal Orthodox church. Probably it was after the fact that some theologian presented the issue of papal authority, that Jesus never established the papacy. Well, as far as I can see, indeed Jesus did not establish a papacy; Gospel writers did. This is my contention: I read that Jesus said to Simon Peter something like this, "You are Peter, and on this rock I shall build my church" ... and not even the fires of hell shall prevail against it. // The Gospels were written in Greek, and the name PETER was PETRA, which means "rock, stone". Therefore Jesus, or the gospel writers,  made a PUN on words: Thou art a rock and on this rock I shall build my church. [Jesus spoke Aramaic; so, "Petra" may be a Greek translation of the name Jesus actually used. His very words are quoted in the Gospels only once, when on the cross he said, "Eloi, Eloi [God, God], why hast thou forsaken me?" But even this is very strange, for why would he address God as God rather 
than, as he believed, as father? Even his prayer says, "Our Father who art in heaven, ...." // As you may remember, Jesus said
all that toPeter after that Peter confirmed Jesus as the son of God. Jesus himself believed that he was the son of God, rather than, as Matthew wrote, the son of Joseph in the bloodline of King David. He also believed that he was the Messiah predicted by the Hebrew Bible. // In conclusion, I'd say that Jesus did not even found his church (Ecclesia, the Assembly of those who believed in him). Catholic and Orthodox Chistians believe that he did, which means that Jesus rejected the Israelites (the "church" of God) and replaced it by the " church of Jesus the Christ". Jesus was not a heretic of the Jewish Faith and indeed accepted the Bible as the foundation of his being the Messiah/Redeemer of the Israelites or, apparently of mankind, for he commissioned his apostles to spread his teachings to other Nations/Peoples. As St. Paul put it, foreigners do not have to be literally circumcised in order to belong to the bosom of Abraham; all they need is a circumcision of the heart. baptism, and: I believe in one God, father omnipotent, ... and in Jesus Christ,... and in one church, universal [for Jews and Gentiles], apostolic [not Petrine/papal]. // There is no need for a schism of the Church, or, perhaps, no need for a Church.

Tying up the loose ends in my post before the last one: I obtained information that, in the Gospels, Peter's Aramaic name was mentioned, that is, Cephas [Kephas], which, according to some interpreters means "Rock or Cliff" . Therefore, Petra or Petros is indeed a translation of  his real name. Thus, speaking metaphorically, Jesus said, "You are a rock, and on this rock....." But I don't know whether the speakers of Aramaic [Jesus, Peter, and the other Galileans] customarily used their words metaphorically; the Greeks (including the Gospel writers) customarily metaphorized, that is, used the names of visible things as the names of invisible things [mental processes; gods; etc.) [As I stated elsewhere, the original gods of any population were seen and, hence, evident. Demonstrations of the existence of a god became necessary when gods were conceived as non-physical, invisible, things -- in the manner of the human mind or of the human person. Since the Greeks personified their "natural" gods, they had to use their "natural" language to speak of the invisibles. Genesis-1, which is an Aramaic/Galilean account of the Elohim --the Gods who created Man in their own image, explicitly male and female -- obviously used their language literally rather than metaphorically. On the other hand, for the Greeks, the descent of buried people to Hades is metaphorical, since the interred corpses remained in their tombs. So, I contend that the episode of Jesus and Peter, as well as the episode of the Last Supper, was concocted by the Greek Gospel writers. (Thereby, Jesus became the new Dio-nysos, Son of Zeus/God:... my blood; my body.)

Speaking of RELICS, let us not forget two pieces of cloth or canvas that are preserved in Italian churches. Both contain an image, which is considered to be the image of the face of Jesus. One is called the Veronica, that is, the true image/icon of Jesus. (Some women are called "Veronica" -- after the just explained name.) Supposedly, the cloth in question was the cloth that was used to dry Jesus' sweat while he was carrying the Cross.
The other cloth is supposed to be the sheet or shroud in which Jesus'svbody was wrapped after its deposition from the Cross and entombed. As it is now preserved in a church of Turin (Italy), it is usually called "the shround of Turin." In the second half of the 20th century, various types of investigations were made in the attempt to establish the authenticity of the shroud -- whether the linen came from Palestine, whether the image of the body and the face of a bearded man was painted on the linen or appeared there miraculously at the resurrection of Jesus, and so forth. A little known fact: An American photographer anointed a marble statue with a certain acid and wrapped the statue in a linen sheet. The result: a negative image of the statue (that is, with a reversal of the dark and light areas of the statue). The image on the shroud is also a photographic negative; the positive image can be obtained by simply photographing the shroud. So, it is physically possible that the shroud's image was counterfietted. Furthermore, I remember reading in a Gospel, many years ago, that when the Marys went to the tomb of Jesus and did not find him there, they noticed that the linen band which was supposed to be wrapped around his head was still unfolded and near the  spot where the head would have rested. So, I conclude that the Shroud of Turin, which has the image of a FACE of a man, cannot be Jesus' shroud, as the real shroud did not wrap his head. Say Farewell to the Turin fake relic.// The Marys found that the stone-door had been rolled out and an angel appeared and told them that he had arisen, but the likely truth is that he had not died on the cross and, therefore, Joseph of Arimethea did not wrap his head when he placed Jesus in the tomb. During the night, with or without assistance, Jesus walked out of the tomb, but the myth of the resurrection was started and persists. As Jesus had been really  injured, on the way to Emmaus, he was not recognized even by his disciples.

a