Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 17, 2020 0:39:18 GMT
Thinking is directive by nature given all thought is the progression if one image to another.
It is this multiplicity of images, which summate as a series of images in itself as one image, that necessitate the image as that which directs given its inherent nature of progression.
This progression, inseperable from both the image and the images as a series of images, is the image itself where the image is directional by nature.
Image is direction as image is progressive with the image as directional necessitating the image as an embodiment of change.
Thought as existing through image is thought as a means of change.
This change is progression of one image to another with this progression reflecting a multiplicity of images. Change is multiplicity.
Thinking is the manifestation of multiplicity which is embodied under the nature of analysis.
It is this multiplicity of images, which summate as a series of images in itself as one image, that necessitate the image as that which directs given its inherent nature of progression.
This progression, inseperable from both the image and the images as a series of images, is the image itself where the image is directional by nature.
Image is direction as image is progressive with the image as directional necessitating the image as an embodiment of change.
Thought as existing through image is thought as a means of change.
This change is progression of one image to another with this progression reflecting a multiplicity of images. Change is multiplicity.
Thinking is the manifestation of multiplicity which is embodied under the nature of analysis.
