Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 11, 2020 23:29:59 GMT
This statement is false - is a famous self-contradiction phrase which is said to be used firstly by Eubilides. Anyway many sees it as ambiguous, because it changes its value or meaning each time we're trying to ascribe it the opposite: saying it's true it becomes false, and vice versa.
But nothing prevents us from claiming that this statement must have firm and once-and-for-all given value or meaning. Why? Nobody calls phrases "it's good" or "it's so amazing!", or a phrase like "you're not fat at all, darling" phrases that have strictly and direct one-meaning or one-value phrases. Formally, however, 'this statement is false' has no similar appearance as those amalgam-phrases. And, anyway, nothing allow us to see many even well-formed phrases like 'all x are x' or 'if p is true, and q is false, then "p implies q" is false' as something empty-values, or meaningless, or as what has meaning under certain circumstances, or even plural-meaning (as tautologies). So, what's so important in that phrase? - Nothing.
You can code it in a program as a negation. It will negate the results with N iterations. As soon as an iteration is just a part of the process nothing unusual will happen if there is an endless number of iterations.
Nevertheless, unlike π we can surely say on which number of iteration with value or meaning we will get: each even iteration will give negative result. So, this function is determined, and this at least can be helpful for us.
So, there is no need to try to manifest any extra third formula here, because there cannot be any third formulas.
But nothing prevents us from claiming that this statement must have firm and once-and-for-all given value or meaning. Why? Nobody calls phrases "it's good" or "it's so amazing!", or a phrase like "you're not fat at all, darling" phrases that have strictly and direct one-meaning or one-value phrases. Formally, however, 'this statement is false' has no similar appearance as those amalgam-phrases. And, anyway, nothing allow us to see many even well-formed phrases like 'all x are x' or 'if p is true, and q is false, then "p implies q" is false' as something empty-values, or meaningless, or as what has meaning under certain circumstances, or even plural-meaning (as tautologies). So, what's so important in that phrase? - Nothing.
You can code it in a program as a negation. It will negate the results with N iterations. As soon as an iteration is just a part of the process nothing unusual will happen if there is an endless number of iterations.
Nevertheless, unlike π we can surely say on which number of iteration with value or meaning we will get: each even iteration will give negative result. So, this function is determined, and this at least can be helpful for us.
So, there is no need to try to manifest any extra third formula here, because there cannot be any third formulas.
